ciunkos.com Rankings

Recommendation systems in Warsaw, ranked for 2027

Best recommendation systems software houses in Warsaw

Przemysław Zalewski · Data snapshot:

  1. 1 JCD.PL 72
  2. 2 FREYSOFT 67
  3. 3 Andersen 66

71 companies with evidence of recommendation systems work in Warsaw; 25 meet the ranking criteria. Sources: 71 by their Clutch profile, KRS records, available financial statements and employee reviews. If one senior engineer is enough, I build AI features with AI agents.

Get matched offers in 24 hours See the top 10 Download the data (CSV)

  • 71 company records
  • 30 with KRS records
  • 29 with a financial statement
  • 29 with an employee review profile
  • 10 ranked

Find your fit

Compare companies

#CompanyPeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
JCD.PL profit 26K PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 625–49 USD/hrecommendation systems 40% iOS and Swift72
2
FREYSOFT profit 158K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 850–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 30% .NET67
3
Andersen profit 363K PLN (2025)
1000-99994.9 · 12950–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 10% Salesforce66
4
GLOBALDEV profit 31K PLN (2025) foreign-owned
250-9994.9 · 11625–49 USD/hrecommendation systems 15% iOS and Swift65
5
Relevant Software profit 608K PLN (2025)
50-2494.9 · 3250–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 20% iOS and Swift64
6
Innowise profit 3M PLN (2025) GoWork 65/10
1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 10% AWS63
7
SolveIt profit 156K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 5325–49 USD/hrecommendation systems 15% Flutter60
8
Darly Solutions profit 321K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 3450–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 15% AWS60
9
Stepwise loss 355K PLN (2025) GoWork 16/1
10-494.9 · 2950–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 25% Google Cloud59
10
deepsense.ai profit 38.9M PLN (2025) GoWork 5/6
50-2495.0 · 10100–149 USD/hrecommendation systems 15%59

The ranking

JCD.PL

Warsaw studio building AI systems, online stores, company websites and mobile apps for small and mid-size firms.

72/100

Clutch: 5.0 (6 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 5,000 USD

Best for: Polish SMEs that want an online store, a B2B panel or a first AI rollout from one Warsaw studio.

Verdict. Take JCD.PL for a small company system, store or AI rollout with long-term care. Skip it for a large platform that needs a big team.

Pros

  • Net profit of 26,200 PLN in 2025 on 1,900,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 6 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The contact page lists an office in Warszawa. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • The Clutch snapshot contains 6 reviews; request references for a comparable project. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The home page claims 20+ years in IT, 560+ projects and 220+ clients. (source)
  • The about page lists 19 specialists and collaborators and says the business became JCD.PL sp. z o.o. in 2019. (source)
  • The about page gives an office at Niedzielskiego 2D/1, while KRS lists Rudnickiego 1/35. (source)
  • The team says it works daily in Claude Code and rolls it out to developer teams. (source)

Clients they name: Allegro, UOKiK, EWL Group, Olimp, Biomed, Specialized, Expertdata, Bemondi, SmartBob

Custom systems with AI AI rollouts and team training Online stores (PrestaShop, WooCommerce, Sylius) Company websites Mobile apps in React Native Maintenance, hosting and SEO AI
JCD.PL homepage
Homepage of jcd.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to JCD.PL.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2019
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
1.9M PLN (2025)
Profit
26K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (1/0)

Score: 72/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.1/5 Stability 3.3/5 Specialization 4.0/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (7) · Checked October 28, 2026

FREYSOFT

Fixed-price engineering for fintech integrations, payment rails, data platforms and AI automation.

67/100

Clutch: 5.0 (8 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Fintech teams with a fixed integration or migration deadline and a budget from 35,000 USD.

Verdict. Pick FreySoft for a fixed-price payment or data integration with a firm date. For a small budget or open-ended product work, look elsewhere.

Pros

  • Net profit of 158,400 PLN in 2025 on 4,300,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 8 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Certifications listed by the company: AWS Partner Network, Google Cloud Partner. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • The Clutch snapshot contains 8 reviews; request references for a comparable project. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The site publishes fixed-price packages from $35,000 for 4-6 weeks and from $65,000 for 8-12 weeks. (source)
  • The footer says FreySoft was founded in 2019 by Oleg Panchenko and runs entities in the US, Portugal, Poland and Ukraine. (source)
  • The site shows no Polish address, KRS or NIP, so the link to the Warsaw company rests on the name and the Clutch profile. (source)
  • A case study describes banking partner integrations for WorldRemit across 70 payment corridors in 12 countries. (source)

Clients they name: WorldRemit, Volkswagen Group Services

API and platform integration Data engineering AI and automation Fintech and payments engineering Legacy rescue and migration AI
FREYSOFT homepage
Homepage of freysoft.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to FREYSOFT.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2020
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
15K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
4.3M PLN (2025)
Profit
158K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 67/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.3/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (9) · Checked October 28, 2026

Andersen

Large international outsourcing company headquartered in Warsaw, selling dedicated teams and full-cycle development in 22 industries.

66/100

Clutch: 4.9 (129 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD Verified

Best for: Companies that need a large dedicated team fast, across many technologies, and can run it with their own product owner.

Verdict. Use Andersen to scale a team you lead, backed by 129 Clutch reviews. Check who signs the contract, given the thin Polish margin and the multi-entity setup.

Pros

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 50,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The offer also includes staff augmentation. Agree who owns project delivery in the contract. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page claims 3,500+ in-house experts, 2,000+ clients, 18 offices and 19 years of experience, with Warsaw as headquarters (source).
  • The footer names other legal entities, UAB Andersen Soft and Andersen Germany GmbH, so the Polish company is one of several (source).
  • Many case studies are under NDA, and the named ones include Deutsche Telekom and Samsung Electronics (source).
  • The site announces the Claude Partner Network and AWS MSP partnership (source).

Clients they name: Samsung Electronics, Deutsche Telekom, BNP Paribas, Verivox, TUI

Custom software development Staff augmentation and dedicated teams AI and data Cloud and DevOps Cybersecurity CRM and ERP AWS Docker Kubernetes Python
Andersen homepage
Homepage of andersenlab.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Andersen.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2019
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
1 shareholder (individual)
Revenue
177.1M PLN (2025)
Profit
363K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
1000-9999
Open roles
22 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
no profile (checked October 28, 2026)

Score: 66/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.5/5 Stability 4.5/5 Specialization 1.0/5 Activity 4.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn

Sources (11) · Checked October 30, 2026

GLOBALDEV

Globaldev Group sells AI-first engineering teams, team extension and AI consulting from hubs across Europe.

65/100

Clutch: 4.9 (116 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Product company that wants to add AI-focused engineers to its own team for months.

Verdict. Pick Globaldev to extend your team with AI-focused engineers at a mid-market rate. Skip it if you want a Polish team you can visit.

Pros

  • Net profit of 31,300 PLN in 2025 on 2,400,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 116 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Certifications listed by the company: Claude Certified Services Partner (claim on home page). (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 50,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)

Discrepancy: company website: 450+ people, but the Polish entity had 2.4M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page claims 450+ in-house experts, 6 development hubs across Europe and 15 years in the market (source).
  • The contact page lists phone numbers for Israel, Europe and the USA and no Polish address (source).
  • The Global Teams service covers recruitment, onboarding, HR and account management for extension teams (source).
  • The home page presents Globaldev as a Claude certified services partner (source).

Clients they name: ECIT, SAKANI

Team extension Custom software development AI consulting and Claude implementation GenAI and AI development Data analytics and data annotation Cloud migration and DevOps Python React Angular AI
GLOBALDEV homepage
Homepage of globaldev.tech, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to GLOBALDEV.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2023
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
Globaldev Group Ltd
Revenue
2.4M PLN (2025)
Profit
31K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
250-999
Open roles
2 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)
Discrepancy
company website: 450+ people, but the Polish entity had 2.4M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Score: 65/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.5/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 1.5/5 Activity 3.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (12) · Checked October 30, 2026

Relevant Software

Software development and consulting firm from Lviv with a Warsaw office, building custom platforms, IoT and AI products.

64/100

Clutch: 4.9 (32 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD

Best for: Healthcare or energy company that needs an IoT or AI product built by a dedicated team over several months.

Verdict. Pick Relevant for an IoT or healthcare product with a multi-month budget. Skip it for a short fixed-price job.

Pros

  • Net profit of 607,700 PLN in 2025 on 14,300,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 32 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The contact page lists an office in Warszawa. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 50,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The home page lists the Warsaw office at Jana Dantyszka 18, the same address as in KRS. (source)
  • The home page claims 100+ in-house experts and 246 delivered projects. (source)
  • The home page sets a minimum commitment of 3 months on time-and-materials terms. (source)
  • The footer copyright names Relevant Software LLC. (source)

Clients they name: Volkswagen, Össur, Norwegian, AstraZeneca, FirstHomeCoach

Full-cycle software development Dedicated development teams AI and machine learning IoT development and consulting Data and BI Security and compliance (HIPAA, penetration testing) AI
Relevant Software homepage
Homepage of relevant.software, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Relevant Software.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
1 shareholder (individual)
Revenue
14.3M PLN (2025)
Profit
608K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 64/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.7/5 Stability 4.3/5 Specialization 2.0/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (12) · Checked October 28, 2026

Innowise

Very large outsourcing and staff augmentation company with a Warsaw headquarters claim and a catalog covering almost every technology.

63/100

Clutch: 4.9 (73 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Teams that must add several developers quickly and can manage an outsourced team under their own tech lead.

Verdict. Use Innowise for staff augmentation under your own tech lead when you need CVs fast across many technologies. Skip it when you need a partner whose past work you can verify.

Pros

  • Net profit of 3,000,000 PLN in 2025 on 251,200,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 73 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The contact page lists an office in Warszawa. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • The offer also includes staff augmentation. Agree who owns project delivery in the contract. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page claims 3,500+ people, 1,600 projects and a founding year of 2007. The Polish company in KRS dates from 2021 (source).
  • The FAQ names Warsaw as headquarters, while the footer gives a registered address in Boston, MA (source).
  • The case studies page names no clients and warns that client details may be generalized or modified (source).
  • Innowise sells staff augmentation openly, promising CVs in 1 to 2 days and a team joining in 3 to 5 days (source).

Clients they name: Hays, Spar, Tietoevry, Topcon, NTT Data, Commercial Bank of Qatar

Custom software development Staff augmentation and dedicated teams Testing and QA Data, AI and ML ERP and CRM Legacy modernization AI
Innowise homepage
Homepage of innowise.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Innowise.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
251.2M PLN (2025)
Profit
3M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
1000-9999
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
positive (65/10)

Score: 63/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.2/5 Stability 5.0/5 Specialization 1.0/5 Activity 2.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

SolveIt

Mobile and web app studio with Warsaw, San Francisco and Stockholm addresses, built around MVPs.

60/100

Clutch: 5.0 (53 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Startups building a mobile-first MVP for e-commerce, real estate or a marketplace, with UX/UI design included.

Verdict. Choose SolveIt for a mobile MVP on a modest budget. For a complex back-office system, ask for matching references first.

Pros

  • Net profit of 155,500 PLN in 2025 on 6,800,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 53 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The contact page lists an office in Warszawa. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page says the team has worked since 2016 and has 50+ in-house professionals. (source)
  • The footer names SolveIt Inc. and shows no Polish legal entity. (source)
  • The portfolio includes a real estate rental app and an RV travel app. (source)
  • The home page promises an MVP within 3 months and specialists within 3+ days. (source)

Clients they name: Out Co., Hemie, DentMe, Gumb, Baibe Bytes AB

Discovery phase UI/UX design Mobile app development (iOS, Android, Flutter) Web app development MVP development Dedicated teams and outstaffing
SolveIt homepage
Homepage of solveit.dev, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to SolveIt.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
6.8M PLN (2025)
Profit
156K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 60/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.0/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 1.5/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (9) · Checked October 28, 2026

Darly Solutions

Software company of 100+ engineers building web and mobile products for healthcare, fintech and SaaS startups.

60/100

Clutch: 5.0 (34 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 1,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Seed and Series A health-tech startups that need a TypeScript web app in Vue.js or Next.js, from MVP onward.

Verdict. Choose Darly for a health-tech MVP or web product. If you need a long Polish track record, check the 2022 registration first.

Pros

  • Net profit of 320,500 PLN in 2025 on 5,400,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 34 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Published projects: Feliz & Thriving.

Cons

  • The offer also includes staff augmentation. Agree who owns project delivery in the contract. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page dates the team to 2016 and claims 100+ engineers. (source)
  • Staff augmentation is the first of three cooperation models on the home page. (source)
  • The home page describes a platform for 108 REVIV clinics in 47 countries. (source)
  • The terms name DARLY SOLUTIONS SP. Z O.O. at the registered Warsaw address. (source)

Clients they name: Feliz & Thriving, REVIV

Custom software development Web development (Vue, React, Next.js) Mobile app development UI/UX design QA and testing Staff augmentation and dedicated teams AI
Darly Solutions homepage
Homepage of www.darly.solutions, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Darly Solutions.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2022
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
5.4M PLN (2025)
Profit
321K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 60/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.0/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 1.5/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

Stepwise

Warsaw AI and cloud partner building machine learning, generative AI and Google Cloud systems.

59/100

Clutch: 4.9 (29 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 100,000 USD

Best for: Manufacturer or data-heavy firm that wants a machine learning or generative AI system on Google Cloud.

Verdict. Pick Stepwise for a Google Cloud ML project with a fixed scope. Check team size and finances first, since 2025 closed at a loss.

Pros

Cons

  • Net loss of 354,800 PLN in 2025 on 800,400 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Declared minimum project: 100,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • Case studies cover Vertex AI for production line parameters, a flight permit system and a proptech data platform (source).
  • The about page cites Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Central Europe 2020 (source).
  • The site gives Loftmill at Kasprzaka 4 in Warsaw, while KRS lists Pytlasińskiego 16 (source).
  • Teams are built as groups of 5-15 engineers around senior architects (source).

Clients they name: Mondeca, PERMITS to Fly, Spica Technologies

AI assessment and strategy AI solution engineering Generative AI Data and machine learning engineering Cloud services on Google Cloud Stepwise AI Assistant AI
Stepwise homepage
Homepage of stepwise.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Stepwise.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2016
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
6K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
800K PLN (2025)
Loss
355K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
positive (16/1)

Score: 59/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.7/5 Stability 2.3/5 Specialization 2.5/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

deepsense.ai

Warsaw applied AI company that builds AI agents, enterprise knowledge systems and MLOps for pharma, healthcare, finance and manufacturing.

59/100

Clutch: 5.0 (10 reviews) Rate: 100–149 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Enterprises in pharma, healthcare, finance or manufacturing that need AI agents, enterprise knowledge systems or MLOps built by a large, profitable AI specialist.

Verdict. Pick deepsense.ai for an enterprise AI agent, RAG or MLOps program, especially in pharma or healthcare, where budget is not the main constraint. Skip it for a small pilot under $25,000 or if employee sentiment matters in your vendor review.

Pros

  • Net profit of 38,900,000 PLN in 2025 on 89,700,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 10 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The contact page lists an office in Warszawa. (2026-10-30 · source)

Cons

  • GoWork records 5 positive and 6 negative reviews. These are user opinions, not independently established events. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The home page claims 200 commercial AI projects, 120 AI experts and 10 years of AI work, and names Unstructured, Sky, Hexagon, Zebra Technologies and Brainly in client quotes (source).
  • The about page says the company has provided AI solutions since 2014, reports an NPS of 82, and says 67% of revenue comes from clients of more than 2 years (source).
  • The site lists Anthropic, OpenAI and Gemini Enterprise partner status and dedicated pages for pharma, clinical trials and healthcare (source).
  • Case studies include a deep research agent with an 84% response quality rate and a GPU setup with 96.3% average utilization (source).
  • The contact page lists the Warsaw HQ at al. Jerozolimskie 44 and an office in Palo Alto, California (source).

Clients they name: Unstructured, Sky, Hexagon, Zebra Technologies, Brainly

AI agents and GenAI LLM/VLM evaluation AI voice bots MLOps Custom MCP servers AI advisory and adoption Computer vision Edge solutions Predictive analytics AI
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2018
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
146K PLN
Owners
Cl Ventures Prosta S.A.
Revenue
89.7M PLN (2025)
Profit
38.9M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
negative (5/6)

Score: 59/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.4/5 Stability 4.0/5 Specialization 1.5/5 Activity 2.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (10) · Checked October 28, 2026

All companies

Show all 71 companies
Size: Rate: · 71
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
JCD.PL recommendation systems 40% iOS and Swift
Warsaw10-495.0 · 625–49 USD/h1.9M PLN26K PLNrecommendation systems 40% iOS and Swift72Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
2
FREYSOFT recommendation systems 30% .NET
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 850–99 USD/h4.3M PLN158K PLNrecommendation systems 30% .NET67Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
3
Andersen recommendation systems 10% Salesforce
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 12950–99 USD/h177.1M PLN363K PLNrecommendation systems 10% Salesforce66Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
4
GLOBALDEV recommendation systems 15% iOS and Swift
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 11625–49 USD/h2.4M PLN31K PLNrecommendation systems 15% iOS and Swift65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
5
Relevant Software recommendation systems 20% iOS and Swift
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 3250–99 USD/h14.3M PLN608K PLNrecommendation systems 20% iOS and Swift64Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
6
Innowise recommendation systems 10% AWS
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/h251.2M PLN3M PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS63Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
7
SolveIt recommendation systems 15% Flutter
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 5325–49 USD/h6.8M PLN156K PLNrecommendation systems 15% Flutter60Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
8
Darly Solutions recommendation systems 15% AWS
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3450–99 USD/h5.4M PLN321K PLNrecommendation systems 15% AWS60Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
9
Stepwise recommendation systems 25% Google Cloud
Warsaw10-494.9 · 2950–99 USD/h800K PLN-355K PLNrecommendation systems 25% Google Cloud59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
10
deepsense.ai recommendation systems 15%
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 10100–149 USD/h89.7M PLN38.9M PLNrecommendation systems 15%59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Five Jars too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 32100–149 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 50% PHP and Laravel60Website Clutch
–
EffectiveSoft body leasing
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 1950–99 USD/h9.4M PLN140K PLNrecommendation systems 20% Java59Website Clutch KRS
–
Fively too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3050–99 USD/h12.5M PLN93K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS58Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Instinctools too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.7 · 3625–49 USD/h14M PLN537K PLNrecommendation systems 15% AWS58Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Romaniuk AI too little client evidence
n/aFreelancer5.0 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 80%58Website Clutch
–
Civitta too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 2350–99 USD/h14.7M PLN2.3M PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS57Website Clutch KRS
–
Euristiq too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 3850–99 USD/h13.9M PLN96K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
PinoByte under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 225–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 55% Python56Website Clutch
–
Vilmate too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/h10.8M PLN43K PLNrecommendation systems 10% Azure56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
XPG Factor too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 550–99 USD/h3.1M PLN58K PLNrecommendation systems 15% .NET56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Modsen too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 725–49 USD/h12.2M PLN890K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS55Website Clutch KRS
–
Codino too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 650–99 USD/h2.8M PLN182K PLNrecommendation systems 10%54Website Clutch KRS
–
Empat too little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 15125–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 35% AWS54Website Clutch
–
Oxagile too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 17n/a2.1M PLN135K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS54Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Plavno too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 5625–49 USD/h4.3M PLN-15K PLNrecommendation systems 20% AWS54Website Clutch KRS
–
Sigma Software Group too little client evidence
n/a1000-99994.8 · 3750–99 USD/h28M PLN909K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS53Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
CleverDev Software too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 650–99 USD/h1.2M PLN94K PLNrecommendation systems 12% AWS52Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
KnubiSoft too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 3625–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 40% Java52Website Clutch
–
Geniusee too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9995.0 · 7125–49 USD/h253K PLNn/arecommendation systems 10% AWS49Website Clutch KRS
–
Neontri too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% iOS and Swift49Website Clutch
–
Primotly too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.7 · 1850–99 USD/h10.3M PLN-138K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS49Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Computools too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 10625–49 USD/h1.6M PLN-387K PLNrecommendation systems 10% Android48Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
GP Solutions too little client evidence
Łódź250-9994.9 · 2450–99 USD/h1.5M PLN-36K PLNrecommendation systems 15% .NET48Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Celadonsoft too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% AWS47Website Clutch
–
Reenbit too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 2325–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% Azure47Website Clutch
–
FlairsTech IT services and help desk, not a software house
Warsaw1000-99994.6 · 11n/a1.9M PLN-1.2M PLNrecommendation systems 20% Azure45Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
WiserBrand too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 16100–149 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% PHP and Laravel45Website Clutch
–
Brocoders too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3950–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 25% AWS44Website Clutch
–
ApexTech too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 950–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% Ruby on Rails43Website Clutch
–
CleverLabs too little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% AWS43Website Clutch
–
Cyboticx too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 46100–149 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% React Native41Website Clutch
–
KITRUM struck off KRS
Warsaw250-9995.0 · 7350–99 USD/h0 PLN-28K PLNrecommendation systems 25% React39Website Clutch KRS
–
BeeCommerce.pl under 10 people
n/a2-94.9 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% Vue.js37Website Clutch
–
Dashbouquet Development too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3450–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% Node.js36Website Clutch
–
Fulcrum too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4025–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% AWS36Website Clutch
–
Algomine too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1250–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15%35Website Clutch
–
Billennium too little client evidence
n/a1000-99995.0 · 1n/an/an/arecommendation systems 15% Java35Website Clutch KRS
–
SDLC Corp too little client evidence
n/a1000-99995.0 · 1925–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 13% Android35Website Clutch
–
Zoolatech too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 1850–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% AWS35Website Clutch
–
10Clouds Financial Institutions too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 9550–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS34Website Clutch
–
Aligned Code too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% AWS34Website Clutch
–
Fabrity too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.7 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Azure34Website Clutch
–
Infograins Software Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 8950–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% iOS and Swift34Website Clutch
–
IT Flow AI under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% Python34Website Clutch
–
CodeWith under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 425–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% TypeScript33Website Clutch
–
datarockets too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2250–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10%33Website Clutch
–
Pynest too little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Python33Website Clutch
–
Yalantis too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.8 · 7950–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS33Website Clutch
–
Atomic Actions too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Python32Website Clutch
–
Helpware Tech too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 3050–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS32Website Clutch
–
Hygge Software too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1525–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Android32Website Clutch
–
PixelPlex too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Flutter32Website Clutch
–
Blackthorn Vision too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 2425–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% .NET31Website Portfolio Clutch
–
EL Passion too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 5850–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Node.js31Website Clutch
–
Shelpuk AI Technology Consulting too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1050–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10%31Website Clutch
–
UASOFTDEV too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS31Website Clutch
–
8allocate too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.7 · 2550–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Databricks and Snowflake30Website Clutch
–
Nozomi too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% iOS and Swift30Website Clutch
–
Madiff too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 450–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Azure29Website Clutch
–
Readiy too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2n/an/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS28Website Clutch
–
SaM Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.5 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Magento (Adobe Commerce)26Website Clutch

Who is not in the top 10, and why

Struck off the register or in liquidation 1

They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.

  • KITRUM

Body leasing, product companies and other services 2

Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.

  • EffectiveSoft
  • FlairsTech

Ranked 11th and below 15

They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.

  • Fively
  • Instinctools
  • Civitta
  • Euristiq
  • Vilmate
  • XPG Factor
  • Modsen
  • Codino
  • Oxagile
  • Plavno
  • Sigma Software Group
  • CleverDev Software
  • + 3 more in the full table

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders 10

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • PinoByte
  • Geniusee (paid)
  • Neontri
  • BeeCommerce.pl
  • Billennium
  • IT Flow AI
  • CodeWith
  • Madiff
  • Readiy
  • SaM Solutions

Weak evidence for recommendation systems 33

They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.

  • Five Jars
  • Romaniuk AI
  • Empat
  • KnubiSoft
  • Celadonsoft
  • Reenbit
  • WiserBrand
  • Brocoders
  • ApexTech
  • CleverLabs
  • Cyboticx
  • Dashbouquet Development
  • + 21 more in the full table

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h 21
50-99 USD/h 42
100-149 USD/h 4
150-199 USD/h 0
Rates declared on Clutch, 67 companies with an office in the city.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Ask for an A/B test result from a live store or app, not offline metrics. A recommender pays off only when it moves conversion or retention.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of November 2, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best recommendation systems software houses in Warsaw in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. JCD.PL (72), 2. FREYSOFT (67), 3. Andersen (66), 4. GLOBALDEV (65), 5. Relevant Software (64). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company in the data set.

How much do recommendation systems agencies in Warsaw charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does recommendation systems?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or the Wrocław company catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,494 companies in the data set
  • 731 with KRS records
  • 462 with a financial statement
  • 7,436 Clutch listing records
  • 690 employee review profiles on GoWork

Sources: Clutch profiles and listings, KRS records, available financial statements from rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository, GoWork reviews, JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs listings, and the Wrocław company catalog. Coverage varies by company; dates and links accompany the available records. The 0 to 100 score combines five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Paid Clutch placements do not increase the score.

Disclosures

  • Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, source links and dates accompany the available company records.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Best software houses in Warsaw 10 agencies ranked by registers, filings and reviews, out of 489 checked. Best recommendation and personalization system companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 158 with recommendation systems evidence in Poland. Best recommendation systems software houses in Wrocław 9 companies ranked out of 25 with recommendation systems evidence in Wrocław. Best recommendation systems software houses in Kraków 6 companies ranked out of 24 with recommendation systems evidence in Kraków. Best React software houses in Warsaw 10 companies ranked out of 163 with React evidence in Warsaw. Best TypeScript software houses in Warsaw 10 companies ranked out of 83 with TypeScript evidence in Warsaw. Best Next.js software houses in Warsaw 10 companies ranked out of 47 with Next.js evidence in Warsaw. Best Node.js software houses in Warsaw 10 companies ranked out of 132 with Node.js evidence in Warsaw. Best AI agents software houses in Warsaw 10 companies ranked out of 49 with AI agents evidence in Warsaw. Best LLM and generative AI software houses in Warsaw 10 companies ranked out of 140 with LLM and generative AI evidence in Warsaw. Best chatbots and conversational AI software houses in Warsaw 10 companies ranked out of 116 with chatbots and conversational AI evidence in Warsaw. Best business process automation software houses in Warsaw 7 companies ranked out of 16 with business process automation evidence in Warsaw.
Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center