140 companies with evidence of LLM and generative AI work in Warsaw; 47 meet the ranking criteria. Sources: 128 by their Clutch profile, 14 by their open roles on JustJoin.it, 17 by their own website, KRS records, available financial statements and employee reviews. If one senior engineer is enough, I build AI features with AI agents.
Team extensionCustom software developmentAI consulting and Claude implementationGenAI and AI developmentData analytics and data annotationCloud migration and DevOpsPythonReactAngularAI
Homepage of globaldev.tech, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to GLOBALDEV.
Best for: Product companies that need an AI feature or agent taken to production, with Polish delivery behind a US parent.
Verdict. Choose Solvd for production AI with a budget above its 50,000 USD minimum. For logistics software, ask for references first, since the site shows none.
Pros
Net profit of 1,600,000 PLN in 2025 on 19,400,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 5/5 from 24 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Best for: Nonprofits and publicly funded US health programs that want a small team to add generative AI to existing software.
Verdict. Choose Freeport Metrics for an AI feature in a US-facing product built by a small team. For Polish public tenders look elsewhere, since its government work is all in the US.
Pros
Net profit of 125,800 PLN in 2025 on 5,300,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 4.8/5 from 15 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Best for: Mid-size and large companies rolling out Microsoft Dynamics, Salesforce or an ERP that want a global vendor with a Polish invoice.
Verdict. Pick Itransition for Dynamics, Salesforce or ERP rollouts at company scale. For a small custom product, the 25,000 USD minimum and the global delivery model are a poor fit.
Pros
Net profit of 3,600,000 PLN in 2025 on 83,400,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 42 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
The contact page lists an office in Warszawa. (2026-10-28 · source)
Cons
Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Discrepancy: company website: 3000+ people, but the Polish entity had 83.4M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity
Projects & technologies
Source observations
The homepage claims 3,000+ engineers, 800+ clients and over 25 years in business. The Polish company in KRS dates from 2017 (source).
The homepage names only two clients, and most case studies describe an unnamed retailer, pharma company or manufacturer (source).
Clutch lists 12 offices, with headquarters in Decatur, GA, and Warsaw among them. The source records contain no accessible office list from the company website (source).
The site lists a Microsoft partnership since 2008, plus Odoo Silver, Salesforce and AWS partnerships (source).
Best for: Companies that need a large dedicated team fast, across many technologies, and can run it with their own product owner.
Verdict. Use Andersen to scale a team you lead, backed by 129 Clutch reviews. Check who signs the contract, given the thin Polish margin and the multi-entity setup.
Pros
Net profit of 363,200 PLN in 2025 on 177,100,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 129 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Best for: Startups that need a browser extension, Electron desktop app or n8n workflow from a small remote team.
Verdict. Hire Sinova for an extension, desktop app or automation with a clear spec. For a long product build, check who sits on the team and where they work.
Pros
Net profit of 182,000 PLN in 2025 on 1,100,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 5/5 from 7 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.
KITRUM
Body leasing, product companies and other services 9
Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.
EffectiveSoft
ImproveIT Solutions
Commoditech
White Label
ALTEN Polska
ITDS
B3 Consulting Poland
FlairsTech
apreel
Website not confirmed 2
The data lacks a confirmed link between the website and the registered company. The company remains unranked until the entity behind the filings and reviews is identified.
NG Logic
PRAS
Ranked 11th and below 37
They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.
JCD.PL
Primotly
SolveIt
Stepwise
WEBSENSA
Computools
DS Stream
Fively
Mainsoft
Order Group
TeaCode
Azati Software
+ 25 more in the full table
Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders 32
Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.
Pragmile
Atomify
BeeCommerce.pl
IN-FOMO.
EMFIRE
QED Software
Processifier
CodeWith
SaM Solutions
Readiy
10 Senses
Neontri
+ 20 more in the full table
Weak evidence for LLM and generative AI 49
They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.
Addepto (Part of KMS Technology)
Startup House
10Clouds Financial Institutions
Devox Software
Fabrity
datarockets
Pynest
Atomic Actions
Dashbouquet Development
Lomray Software
Quantum
Algomine
+ 37 more in the full table
What they charge
On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.
For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.
25-49 USD/h49
50-99 USD/h74
100-149 USD/h9
150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 132 companies with an office in the city.
Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes
Ask how they measure answer quality: an evaluation set, the error rate and the cost per request. A chat over your PDFs is a weekend demo; a system you can trust needs evals and guardrails.
Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.
Get offers from the best-fit agencies
Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours
Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.
How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of November 2, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.
Questions
What are the best LLM and generative AI software houses in Warsaw in 2027?
By the score on this page: 1. GLOBALDEV (90), 2. Solvd (86), 3. Flobotics (85), 4. Civitta (85), 5. MITRIX Technology (85). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company in the data set.
How much do LLM and generative AI agencies in Warsaw charge?
Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.
How do you know a company does LLM and generative AI?
From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or the Wrocław company catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.
Did any company pay to be on this list?
No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.
Can I get my company added or corrected?
Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.
How this ranking was made
1,494companies in the data set
731with KRS records
462with a financial statement
7,436Clutch listing records
690employee review profiles on GoWork
Sources: Clutch profiles and listings, KRS records, available financial statements from rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository, GoWork reviews, JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs listings, and the Wrocław company catalog. Coverage varies by company; dates and links accompany the available records. The 0 to 100 score combines five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Paid Clutch placements do not increase the score.
Disclosures
Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, source links and dates accompany the available company records.
Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.
“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation
Confidential by default. NDA is standard. I never show your project, name or screenshots without written consent, which is why this site names no clients without permission.
Your code, your accounts. Code and data stay in your repository and accounts. AI tools run with training on your data turned off, and secrets never reach a model.
A handover you can use. Every project ends with the same checklist: a README that gets it running, one architecture diagram, written decisions, CI, a runbook and a recorded walkthrough. It is done when someone outside the project can run it from the docs.
Boring technology where it counts. I pick a stack you can hire for. Anything experimental needs your yes and an exit plan.
Approach matched to your risk appetite. Prototype, product or regulated: the level decides how much autonomy the agents get and how much review and validation each change needs.
Everything checkable. Every number on my pages links to its source. My tools are free, and the idea validator skill is open source (MIT).
My pledge
Reply within 24 hours. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally, not a bot. Weekend messages: by Monday noon.
Late means free. If I am late, the first hour of work is free. You do not have to ask.
Scope in writing within 24 hours. A free 30-minute call with no company deck, then the scope and the price in writing within 24 hours. You decide.
The person who does the work. You talk to the person who does the work. No sales layer, no handoff.
Follow-up only with news. I follow up only when I have something new for you. Never a "did you see my offer".
Honest "not a fit". If I am not the right person, I say so on the call and point you to someone who is.
Civitta 
GLOBALDEV
