ciunkos.com Rankings

Recommendation systems in Poland, ranked for 2027

Best recommendation and personalization system companies in Poland

Przemysław Zalewski · Data snapshot:

  1. 1 Stratoflow 78
  2. 2 Netguru 73
  3. 3 JCD.PL 72

158 companies with evidence of recommendation systems work in Poland; 49 meet the ranking criteria. Sources: 158 by their Clutch profile, KRS records, available financial statements and employee reviews. If one senior engineer is enough, I build AI features with AI agents.

Get matched offers in 24 hours See the top 10 Download the data (CSV)

  • 158 company records
  • 71 with KRS records
  • 68 with a financial statement
  • 68 with an employee review profile
  • 3 service-area listings

Find your fit

Compare companies

#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Stratoflow profit 869K PLN (2025)
Wrocław10-494.8 · 1250–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 100% Java78
2
Netguru profit 6.3M PLN (2025) GoWork 25/73
Poznań250-9994.8 · 7350–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 30% AWS73
3
JCD.PL profit 26K PLN (2025)
Warsaw10-495.0 · 625–49 USD/hrecommendation systems 40% iOS and Swift72
4
DBB Software profit 1.5M PLN (2025)
Kraków50-2495.0 · 3425–49 USD/hrecommendation systems 30% Magento (Adobe Commerce)70
5
Deviniti profit 30.4M PLN (2025)
Wrocław250-9995.0 · 4650–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 10% Flutter67
6
FREYSOFT profit 158K PLN (2025)
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 850–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 30% .NET67
7
Andersen profit 363K PLN (2025)
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 12950–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 10% Salesforce66
8
Univio loss 3.2M PLN (2025)
Wrocław250-9994.7 · 3050–99 USD/hrecommendation systems 30% .NET66
9
GLOBALDEV profit 31K PLN (2025) foreign-owned
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 11625–49 USD/hrecommendation systems 15% iOS and Swift65
10
Monterail profit 1.2M PLN (2025) GoWork 6/16
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 6425–49 USD/hrecommendation systems 20% AWS65

The ranking

Stratoflow

Wrocław Java firm that modernizes and scales data-intensive platforms for fintech, insurance and travel.

78/100

Clutch: 4.8 (12 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Fintech and travel platforms with a Java core that must handle more load without a full rewrite.

Verdict. Pick Stratoflow to modernize or speed up a busy Java platform. For mobile apps or a non-Java stack, look elsewhere.

Pros

  • Net profit of 868,600 PLN in 2025 on 4,800,000 PLN revenue. (2026-09-22 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.8/5 from 12 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000826477. (2026-09-22 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The contact page names Codedose CDX sp. z o.o. sp.k. at Łaciarska 4 in Wrocław with KRS 0000826477. (source)
  • The site dates the firm to 2013, while the current KRS entity was registered in 2020. (source)
  • The FastPost case claims 1 billion ledger transactions in under an hour, in production since 2013. (source)
  • The site reports 7% annual attrition and says all engineers are direct employees with no subcontracting. (source)

Clients they name: Barclays, Legerity, TUI, WebBeds, GetResponse, Eurobank, Mennica Skarbowa

Java development for data-intensive platforms Application modernization Performance engineering AI integration Managed Java application support Technical due diligence Java Salesforce Spring AI
Stratoflow homepage
Homepage of stratoflow.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Stratoflow.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2020
HQ (KRS)
Wrocław
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Revenue
4.8M PLN (2025)
Profit
869K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Open roles
0 (October 29, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
no ratings (0/0)

Score: 78/100

Transparency 4.0/5 Client reputation 3.0/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 5.0/5 Activity 2.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (12) · Checked October 29, 2026

Netguru

Poznań digital product company focused on commerce platforms, marketplaces, AI and design for large brands.

73/100

Clutch: 4.8 (73 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Well-funded commerce and marketplace businesses that want a known brand to build or scale their platform.

Verdict. Pick Netguru for a well-funded commerce or marketplace build with a known brand behind it. Check team continuity first, given the staff opinions and freelance hiring.

Pros

  • Net profit of 6,300,000 PLN in 2025 on 127,500,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.8/5 from 73 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Certifications listed by the company: Certified B Corporation. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • GoWork records 25 positive and 73 negative reviews. These are user opinions, not independently established events. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Declared minimum project: 50,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page dates the company to 2008 and lists 400+ people, 2500+ projects and an NPS of 73 (source).
  • Netguru describes itself as a certified B Corporation (source).
  • The site lists only one office, in Poznań, and activity across the US, UK, DACH and MENA (source).
  • Clutch lists 73 reviews with a 4.8 average and one location (source).

Clients they name: IKEA, Volkswagen, Żabka, Careem, Vinted, Delivery Hero

Software engineering Product and experience design AI and data Cloud and platform engineering Strategy and innovation Quality assurance Python Salesforce React AI
Netguru homepage
Homepage of www.netguru.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Netguru.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2018
HQ (KRS)
Poznań
Legal form
S.A.
Share capital
108K PLN
Revenue
127.5M PLN (2025)
Profit
6.3M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
250-999
Open roles
27 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
negative (25/73)

Score: 73/100

Transparency 4.3/5 Client reputation 3.9/5 Stability 3.5/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 5.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 30, 2026

JCD.PL

Warsaw studio building AI systems, online stores, company websites and mobile apps for small and mid-size firms.

72/100

Clutch: 5.0 (6 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 5,000 USD

Best for: Polish SMEs that want an online store, a B2B panel or a first AI rollout from one Warsaw studio.

Verdict. Take JCD.PL for a small company system, store or AI rollout with long-term care. Skip it for a large platform that needs a big team.

Pros

  • Net profit of 26,200 PLN in 2025 on 1,900,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 6 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000782199. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • The Clutch snapshot contains 6 reviews; request references for a comparable project. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The home page claims 20+ years in IT, 560+ projects and 220+ clients. (source)
  • The about page lists 19 specialists and collaborators and says the business became JCD.PL sp. z o.o. in 2019. (source)
  • The about page gives an office at Niedzielskiego 2D/1, while KRS lists Rudnickiego 1/35. (source)
  • The team says it works daily in Claude Code and rolls it out to developer teams. (source)

Clients they name: Allegro, UOKiK, EWL Group, Olimp, Biomed, Specialized, Expertdata, Bemondi, SmartBob

Custom systems with AI AI rollouts and team training Online stores (PrestaShop, WooCommerce, Sylius) Company websites Mobile apps in React Native Maintenance, hosting and SEO AI
JCD.PL homepage
Homepage of jcd.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to JCD.PL.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2019
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
1.9M PLN (2025)
Profit
26K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (1/0)

Score: 72/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.1/5 Stability 3.3/5 Specialization 4.0/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (7) · Checked October 28, 2026

DBB Software

Software company founded in Dnipro, now headquartered in Kraków, building AI features, web and mobile products with teams in Ukraine and Poland.

70/100

Clutch: 5.0 (34 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Startups and SMBs with a defined web, mobile or AI build that want low rates and accept a team working from Ukraine.

Verdict. Pick DBB Software for a defined web or AI build at low rates, delivered from Ukraine with a Kraków front office. Skip it if you need a team in Poland.

Pros

  • Net profit of 1,500,000 PLN in 2025 on 3,600,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 34 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Published projects: Lakera.

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The timeline says the company was founded in February 2015 in Dnipro, Ukraine, and opened a Kraków office in November 2021 (source).
  • The timeline's latest headcount is 89 people across Dnipro, Lviv and Kraków in August 2023. The homepage claims 100+ engineers (source).
  • The site states ISO/IEC 27001 certification in June 2026 and AWS Select Tier status (source).
  • Clutch lists 34 reviews, a 25 to 49 USD rate band and locations in Kraków and Dnipro (source).

Clients they name: Lakera, Choo Choo, Bookis, Plaace, Doctify, DispatchHealth

AI integration and agentic AI Web and mobile development MVP development Dedicated teams Cloud and DevOps UI/UX design AI
DBB Software homepage
Homepage of dbbsoftware.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to DBB Software.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Kraków
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
3.6M PLN (2025)
Profit
1.5M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 70/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.0/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (10) · Checked October 28, 2026

Deviniti

Large Wrocław IT firm selling Atlassian and monday.com consulting, its own Marketplace apps and generative AI services to enterprises.

67/100

Clutch: 5.0 (46 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Anything around Atlassian, Jira, monday.com or a migration to Atlassian Cloud, and enterprise projects that need a 250+ company behind them.

Verdict. If your problem lives in Jira, Confluence or monday.com, this is the obvious call in Wrocław. For a custom product, read the case studies first and ask which team you would get.

Pros

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • Deviniti is the oldest and largest firm in the set. It was founded in 2004, has 330 IT experts and released its first Atlassian Marketplace app in 2012 (source).
  • The business centers on Atlassian, monday.com and Freshworks consulting plus its own apps, with generative AI layered on top (source).
  • Client counts conflict on one page, with 15,000 clients in the intro, 10,000 in the 2023 milestone and 236 organizations in the client section (source).
  • Many case studies are anonymized (a bank, a parcel company, a healthcare company), so only a few names can be verified (source).

Clients they name: Huuuge Games, Credit Agricole Bank Polska, IPF International Limited, Ceneo.pl, Super-Pharm

Atlassian consulting Atlassian apps Generative AI monday.com implementation Cloud migration AI managed services AI
Deviniti homepage
Homepage of deviniti.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Deviniti.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2004
HQ (KRS)
Wrocław
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
54K PLN
Owners
3 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
407.8M PLN (2025)
Profit
30.4M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
250-999
Open roles
2 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
mixed (8/13)

Score: 67/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.0/5 Stability 5.0/5 Specialization 1.0/5 Activity 4.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (15) · Checked October 30, 2026

FREYSOFT

Fixed-price engineering for fintech integrations, payment rails, data platforms and AI automation.

67/100

Clutch: 5.0 (8 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Fintech teams with a fixed integration or migration deadline and a budget from 35,000 USD.

Verdict. Pick FreySoft for a fixed-price payment or data integration with a firm date. For a small budget or open-ended product work, look elsewhere.

Pros

  • Net profit of 158,400 PLN in 2025 on 4,300,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 8 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Certifications listed by the company: AWS Partner Network, Google Cloud Partner. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • The Clutch snapshot contains 8 reviews; request references for a comparable project. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The site publishes fixed-price packages from $35,000 for 4-6 weeks and from $65,000 for 8-12 weeks. (source)
  • The footer says FreySoft was founded in 2019 by Oleg Panchenko and runs entities in the US, Portugal, Poland and Ukraine. (source)
  • The site shows no Polish address, KRS or NIP, so the link to the Warsaw company rests on the name and the Clutch profile. (source)
  • A case study describes banking partner integrations for WorldRemit across 70 payment corridors in 12 countries. (source)

Clients they name: WorldRemit, Volkswagen Group Services

API and platform integration Data engineering AI and automation Fintech and payments engineering Legacy rescue and migration AI
FREYSOFT homepage
Homepage of freysoft.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to FREYSOFT.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2020
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
15K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
4.3M PLN (2025)
Profit
158K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 67/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.3/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (9) · Checked October 28, 2026

Andersen

Large international outsourcing company headquartered in Warsaw, selling dedicated teams and full-cycle development in 22 industries.

66/100

Clutch: 4.9 (129 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD Verified

Best for: Companies that need a large dedicated team fast, across many technologies, and can run it with their own product owner.

Verdict. Use Andersen to scale a team you lead, backed by 129 Clutch reviews. Check who signs the contract, given the thin Polish margin and the multi-entity setup.

Pros

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 50,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The offer also includes staff augmentation. Agree who owns project delivery in the contract. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page claims 3,500+ in-house experts, 2,000+ clients, 18 offices and 19 years of experience, with Warsaw as headquarters (source).
  • The footer names other legal entities, UAB Andersen Soft and Andersen Germany GmbH, so the Polish company is one of several (source).
  • Many case studies are under NDA, and the named ones include Deutsche Telekom and Samsung Electronics (source).
  • The site announces the Claude Partner Network and AWS MSP partnership (source).

Clients they name: Samsung Electronics, Deutsche Telekom, BNP Paribas, Verivox, TUI

Custom software development Staff augmentation and dedicated teams AI and data Cloud and DevOps Cybersecurity CRM and ERP AWS Docker Kubernetes Python
Andersen homepage
Homepage of andersenlab.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Andersen.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2019
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
1 shareholder (individual)
Revenue
177.1M PLN (2025)
Profit
363K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
1000-9999
Open roles
22 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
no profile (checked October 28, 2026)

Score: 66/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.5/5 Stability 4.5/5 Specialization 1.0/5 Activity 4.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn

Sources (11) · Checked October 30, 2026

Univio

Wrocław IT group, formerly Unity, building B2B and B2C commerce, PIM, data platforms and custom software.

66/100

Clutch: 4.7 (30 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Large retailers and manufacturers that need B2B commerce, PIM or replatforming with data and cloud work attached.

Verdict. Pick Univio for a large B2B commerce or PIM program. A small Shopify store will pay for structure it does not need.

Pros

  • Clutch rating of 4.7/5 from 30 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Published projects: mBank, Tubądzin, SIG.
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0001205824. (2026-09-22 · source)

Cons

  • Net loss of 3,200,000 PLN in 2025 on 88,000,000 PLN revenue. (2026-09-22 · source)
  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page traces the company to Internet Designers in 1997, later Unity, rebranded as Univio in 2024 (source)
  • The about page claims 500+ employees and offices in Wrocław, Kraków, Leipzig and Munich (source)
  • Case studies include a B2B platform for SIG with over PLN 1B in sales and integrations for LPP (source)
  • The technology list includes Shopify, commercetools, Magento 2, AWS, Azure and GCP, without partner tiers (source)

Clients they name: mBank, Tubądzin, SIG, LPP, Kuchnia Vikinga, Techstep

Digital consulting B2B and B2C e-commerce PIM and composable commerce Data, BI and analytics Managed cloud and DevOps AI-assisted custom software JavaScript .NET Java Python
Univio homepage
Homepage of www.univio.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Univio.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2025
HQ (KRS)
Wrocław
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5.8M PLN
Owners
family foundation ×3
Revenue
88M PLN (2025)
Loss
3.2M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
250-999
Employees (LinkedIn)
201-500, 8,000 followers (September 16, 2026)
Open roles
10 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
mixed (3/4)

Score: 66/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.1/5 Stability 2.0/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 5.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (15) · Checked October 30, 2026

GLOBALDEV

Globaldev Group sells AI-first engineering teams, team extension and AI consulting from hubs across Europe.

65/100

Clutch: 4.9 (116 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Product company that wants to add AI-focused engineers to its own team for months.

Verdict. Pick Globaldev to extend your team with AI-focused engineers at a mid-market rate. Skip it if you want a Polish team you can visit.

Pros

  • Net profit of 31,300 PLN in 2025 on 2,400,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 116 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Certifications listed by the company: Claude Certified Services Partner (claim on home page). (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 50,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)

Discrepancy: company website: 450+ people, but the Polish entity had 2.4M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page claims 450+ in-house experts, 6 development hubs across Europe and 15 years in the market (source).
  • The contact page lists phone numbers for Israel, Europe and the USA and no Polish address (source).
  • The Global Teams service covers recruitment, onboarding, HR and account management for extension teams (source).
  • The home page presents Globaldev as a Claude certified services partner (source).

Clients they name: ECIT, SAKANI

Team extension Custom software development AI consulting and Claude implementation GenAI and AI development Data analytics and data annotation Cloud migration and DevOps Python React Angular AI
GLOBALDEV homepage
Homepage of globaldev.tech, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to GLOBALDEV.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2023
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
Globaldev Group Ltd
Revenue
2.4M PLN (2025)
Profit
31K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
250-999
Open roles
2 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)
Discrepancy
company website: 450+ people, but the Polish entity had 2.4M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Score: 65/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.5/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 1.5/5 Activity 3.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (12) · Checked October 30, 2026

Monterail

Product design and software studio (Vue and Nuxt partner) building web, mobile and AI products for global brands since 2010.

65/100

Clutch: 4.8 (64 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: A funded startup or a brand that wants a known Wrocław name with a big public portfolio, a US office and official Vue and Nuxt partner status.

Verdict. The best-known name on this list and the best client reviews by volume, dragged down by what its own people say. Hire it for the portfolio, write the team into the contract.

Pros

  • Net profit of 1,200,000 PLN in 2025 on 29,300,000 PLN revenue. (2026-09-22 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.8/5 from 64 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Published projects: Flink, Pizza Hut, Merck.

Cons

  • GoWork records 6 positive and 16 negative reviews. These are user opinions, not independently established events. (2026-09-22 · source)
  • The offer also includes staff augmentation. Agree who owns project delivery in the contract. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • Monterail has the biggest public portfolio in the set, with about 70 case studies naming brands such as Flink, Pizza Hut, Merck and Polaroid (source).
  • Monterail grows by acquisition, buying Untitled Kingdom (2024), ElPassion (2025) and Lakeview Labs (2025) (source).
  • Monterail is the only firm here with a US office (Chicago) and a Berlin address. It is also an official Vue and Nuxt partner (source).
  • The homepage says 400+ clients and 900+ projects, and the site never breaks these numbers down (source).

Clients they name: Flink, Pizza Hut, Merck, Polaroid, SPIE, Convatec

Web development Mobile apps Product design AI solutions MVP development Staff augmentation React Vue Ruby Elixir
Monterail homepage
Homepage of www.monterail.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Monterail.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2010
HQ (KRS)
Wrocław
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
family foundation ×2
Revenue
29.3M PLN (2025)
Profit
1.2M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 29, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
negative (6/16)

Score: 65/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.9/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 2.0/5 Activity 2.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (14) · Checked October 29, 2026

All companies

Show all 158 companies
Size: Rate: · 158
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
Stratoflow recommendation systems 100% Java
Wrocław10-494.8 · 1250–99 USD/h4.8M PLN869K PLNrecommendation systems 100% Java78Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
2
Netguru recommendation systems 30% AWS
Poznań250-9994.8 · 7350–99 USD/h127.5M PLN6.3M PLNrecommendation systems 30% AWS73Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
3
JCD.PL recommendation systems 40% iOS and Swift
Warsaw10-495.0 · 625–49 USD/h1.9M PLN26K PLNrecommendation systems 40% iOS and Swift72Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
4
DBB Software recommendation systems 30% Magento (Adobe Commerce)
Kraków50-2495.0 · 3425–49 USD/h3.6M PLN1.5M PLNrecommendation systems 30% Magento (Adobe Commerce)70Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
5
Deviniti recommendation systems 10% Flutter
Wrocław250-9995.0 · 4650–99 USD/h407.8M PLN30.4M PLNrecommendation systems 10% Flutter67Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
6
FREYSOFT recommendation systems 30% .NET
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 850–99 USD/h4.3M PLN158K PLNrecommendation systems 30% .NET67Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
7
Andersen recommendation systems 10% Salesforce
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 12950–99 USD/h177.1M PLN363K PLNrecommendation systems 10% Salesforce66Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
8
Univio recommendation systems 30% .NET
Wrocław250-9994.7 · 3050–99 USD/h88M PLN-3.2M PLNrecommendation systems 30% .NET66Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
9
GLOBALDEV recommendation systems 15% iOS and Swift
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 11625–49 USD/h2.4M PLN31K PLNrecommendation systems 15% iOS and Swift65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
10
Monterail recommendation systems 20% AWS
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 6425–49 USD/h29.3M PLN1.2M PLNrecommendation systems 20% AWS65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Spiral Scout based in Warsaw; local office unconfirmed
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 5450–99 USD/h5.2M PLN11K PLNrecommendation systems 40% Shopify76Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Momentum too little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 4550–99 USD/h25.6M PLN1.7M PLNrecommendation systems 15% Ruby on Rails65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Synergy Codes too little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 15100–149 USD/h22.5M PLN351K PLNrecommendation systems 20% .NET65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
N-iX body leasing
Kraków1000-99994.8 · 3550–99 USD/h15.5M PLN1.2M PLNrecommendation systems 15% AWS64Website Clutch KRS
–
Relevant Software too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 3250–99 USD/h14.3M PLN608K PLNrecommendation systems 20% iOS and Swift64Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Apzumi too little client evidence
Poznań50-2494.9 · 4950–99 USD/h14M PLN68K PLNrecommendation systems 20% Angular63Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Innowise too little client evidence
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/h251.2M PLN3M PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS63Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Scalo body leasing
Wrocław250-9994.7 · 3350–99 USD/h162.2M PLN8.1M PLNrecommendation systems 15% Java63Website Clutch KRS
–
Upside too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 10100–149 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 50% AWS63Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Framna too little client evidence
Gdańsk250-9994.9 · 18n/a31.4M PLN3.6M PLNrecommendation systems 10% iOS and Swift61Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Darly Solutions too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3450–99 USD/h5.4M PLN321K PLNrecommendation systems 15% AWS60Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Five Jars too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 32100–149 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 50% PHP and Laravel60Website Clutch
–
SolveIt too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 5325–49 USD/h6.8M PLN156K PLNrecommendation systems 15% Flutter60Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Techstack company body leasing
Wrocław50-2495.0 · 4750–99 USD/h24.6M PLN1.6M PLNrecommendation systems 15% AWS60Website Clutch KRS
–
Akveo based in Warsaw; local office unconfirmed
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3150–99 USD/h11.3M PLN515K PLNrecommendation systems 10% Azure59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
deepsense.ai too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 10100–149 USD/h89.7M PLN38.9M PLNrecommendation systems 15%59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
EffectiveSoft body leasing
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 1950–99 USD/h9.4M PLN140K PLNrecommendation systems 20% Java59Website Clutch KRS
–
Lember too little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1025–49 USD/h137K PLN70K PLNrecommendation systems 20% iOS and Swift59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Neti too little client evidence
Rzeszów10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h5.3M PLN817K PLNrecommendation systems 10% TypeScript59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Stepwise too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 2950–99 USD/h800K PLN-355K PLNrecommendation systems 25% Google Cloud59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Agiliway too little client evidence
Kraków50-2494.6 · 1950–99 USD/h2.1M PLN98K PLNrecommendation systems 20% AWS58Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Fively too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3050–99 USD/h12.5M PLN93K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS58Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Instinctools too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.7 · 3625–49 USD/h14M PLN537K PLNrecommendation systems 15% AWS58Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Romaniuk AI too little client evidence
n/aFreelancer5.0 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 80%58Website Clutch
–
Civitta too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 2350–99 USD/h14.7M PLN2.3M PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS57Website Clutch KRS
–
Gecko Dynamics too little client evidence
Kraków10-494.9 · 2950–99 USD/h5.7M PLN-272K PLNrecommendation systems 25% Java57Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Merixstudio too little client evidence
Poznań50-2494.8 · 9750–99 USD/h29.1M PLN2.9M PLNrecommendation systems 10% Python57Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Siili Solutions body leasing
Wrocław250-9994.9 · 750–99 USD/h37.3M PLN3.4M PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS57Website Clutch KRS
–
The Force Code too little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 225–49 USD/h1.1M PLN87K PLNrecommendation systems 20% PHP and Laravel57Website Clutch KRS
–
Euristiq too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 3850–99 USD/h13.9M PLN96K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
PinoByte under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 225–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 55% Python56Website Clutch
–
STX Next too little client evidence
Poznań250-9994.7 · 10350–99 USD/h128.1M PLN9.5M PLNrecommendation systems 10% Python56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
TechMagic too little client evidence
Kraków250-9994.8 · 5450–99 USD/h11.5M PLN1.2M PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Vilmate too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/h10.8M PLN43K PLNrecommendation systems 10% Azure56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
XPG Factor too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 550–99 USD/h3.1M PLN58K PLNrecommendation systems 15% .NET56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Apptension too little client evidence
Poznań50-2494.8 · 2250–99 USD/h9.6M PLN-315K PLNrecommendation systems 25% AWS55Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Coherent Solutions body leasing
Wrocław1000-99994.7 · 3050–99 USD/h112.1M PLN4.4M PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS55Website Clutch KRS
–
Modsen too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 725–49 USD/h12.2M PLN890K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS55Website Clutch KRS
–
Codino too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 650–99 USD/h2.8M PLN182K PLNrecommendation systems 10%54Website Clutch KRS
–
Emerline body leasing
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 2550–99 USD/h2.6M PLN-253K PLNrecommendation systems 20% Azure54Website Clutch KRS
–
Empat too little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 15125–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 35% AWS54Website Clutch
–
Neoteric too little client evidence
Gdańsk50-2495.0 · 7150–99 USD/h9M PLN-1.2M PLNrecommendation systems 15% TypeScript54Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Oxagile too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 17n/a2.1M PLN135K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS54Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Plavno too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 5625–49 USD/h4.3M PLN-15K PLNrecommendation systems 20% AWS54Website Clutch KRS
–
Software Mind too little client evidence
Kraków1000-99994.9 · 5850–99 USD/h254.9M PLN7.9M PLNrecommendation systems 10% Java54Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
anchor.team marketing agency
Poznań10-494.9 · 1950–99 USD/h4.2M PLN-144K PLNrecommendation systems 20%53Website Clutch KRS
–
Onely too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 19200–300 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 40%53Website Clutch
–
Sigma Software Group too little client evidence
n/a1000-99994.8 · 3750–99 USD/h28M PLN909K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS53Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Boldare too little client evidence
Gliwice50-2494.8 · 6350–99 USD/h21.2M PLN647K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS52Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Brights based in Warsaw; local office unconfirmed
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 4125–49 USD/h8.3M PLNn/arecommendation systems 10% Android52Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
CleverDev Software too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 650–99 USD/h1.2M PLN94K PLNrecommendation systems 12% AWS52Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
KnubiSoft too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 3625–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 40% Java52Website Clutch
–
Pragmatic Coders too little client evidence
Kraków50-2494.8 · 1850–99 USD/h23.1M PLN-531K PLNrecommendation systems 15% AWS52Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Cleveroad too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 8225–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% AWS51Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Clover Dynamics website not confirmed
Kraków50-2495.0 · 2125–49 USD/h111K PLN-4K PLNrecommendation systems 20% AWS51Website Clutch KRS
–
Jellyfish.tech too little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 1325–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 40% AWS51Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Cody Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 1550–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 35% iOS and Swift50Website Clutch
–
Tallium office unconfirmed (Clutch “serves”)
Rzeszów50-2495.0 · 4425–49 USD/h9.4M PLNn/arecommendation systems 10% iOS and Swift50Website Clutch KRS
–
Corpsoft Solutions based in n/d; local office unconfirmed
n/d50-2495.0 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% PHP and Laravel49Website Clutch
–
Geniusee too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9995.0 · 7125–49 USD/h253K PLNn/arecommendation systems 10% AWS49Website Clutch KRS
–
Neontri too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% iOS and Swift49Website Clutch
–
Primotly too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.7 · 1850–99 USD/h10.3M PLN-138K PLNrecommendation systems 10% AWS49Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Computools too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 10625–49 USD/h1.6M PLN-387K PLNrecommendation systems 10% Android48Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
GP Solutions too little client evidence
Łódź250-9994.9 · 2450–99 USD/h1.5M PLN-36K PLNrecommendation systems 15% .NET48Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Celadonsoft too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% AWS47Website Clutch
–
Inwedo too little client evidence
Łódź50-2494.6 · 950–99 USD/h7.3M PLN-681K PLNrecommendation systems 15% Azure47Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Reenbit too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 2325–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% Azure47Website Clutch
–
Appunite too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% AWS46Website Clutch
–
Halo Lab too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 10025–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 25% React46Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Coreteka body leasing
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 1025–49 USD/h1.6M PLN-57K PLNrecommendation systems 15% Vue.js45Website Clutch KRS
–
FlairsTech IT services and help desk, not a software house
Warsaw1000-99994.6 · 11n/a1.9M PLN-1.2M PLNrecommendation systems 20% Azure45Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
G-Group.dev too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1225–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% AWS45Website Clutch
–
WiserBrand too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 16100–149 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% PHP and Laravel45Website Clutch
–
Brocoders too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3950–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 25% AWS44Website Clutch
–
GRUPA INSIGHT based in Marki; local office unconfirmed
Marki10-495.0 · 250–99 USD/h1.1M PLN-49K PLNrecommendation systems 10% PHP and Laravel44Website Clutch KRS
–
Polar Night Software too little client evidence
Łódź10-494.8 · 850–99 USD/h5.1M PLN-172K PLNrecommendation systems 10% React44Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Adexin too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2850–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 25% AWS43Website Portfolio Clutch
–
ApexTech too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 950–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% Ruby on Rails43Website Clutch
–
CleverLabs too little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% AWS43Website Clutch
–
EfficientWeb too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 450–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% PHP and Laravel43Website Clutch
–
Pirxey too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% .NET43Website Clutch
–
Seven Bison too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30%43Website Clutch
–
VolHan too little client evidence
n/aFreelancer5.0 · 250–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 30% React42Website Clutch
–
Cyboticx too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 46100–149 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% React Native41Website Clutch
–
Inspirit Dev too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 25% Java41Website Clutch
–
Synebo too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 25%41Website Clutch
–
Vention based in Warsaw; local office unconfirmed
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 10350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS41Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
SysGears too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3025–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% AWS40Website Clutch
–
CodeIT too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% Node.js39Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Indeema too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 8150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15%39Website Portfolio Clutch
–
KITRUM struck off KRS
Warsaw250-9995.0 · 7350–99 USD/h0 PLN-28K PLNrecommendation systems 25% React39Website Clutch KRS
–
Simform office unconfirmed (Clutch “serves”)
n/a1000-99994.8 · 8925–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% Azure39Website Clutch
–
UKAD too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 3650–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% Azure39Website Clutch
–
1000software too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% PHP and Laravel38Website Portfolio Clutch
–
LemonMind.com too little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 250–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 25% PHP and Laravel38Website Clutch
–
Leobit office unconfirmed (Clutch “serves”)
n/a50-2495.0 · 6325–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% .NET38Website Clutch
–
Liki too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 3450–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% React38Website Clutch
–
Onix-Systems too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.8 · 5625–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% React38Website Clutch
–
Symphony Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 1925–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% AWS38Website Clutch
–
BeeCommerce.pl under 10 people
n/a2-94.9 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% Vue.js37Website Clutch
–
Bright Coders' Factory body leasing
Opole50-2494.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% Python37Website Clutch KRS
–
Artkai too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 5350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% Azure36Website Clutch
–
Dashbouquet Development too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3450–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% Node.js36Website Clutch
–
Engipulse too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 450–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% AWS36Website Clutch
–
Fulcrum too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4025–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% AWS36Website Clutch
–
unicrew too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 6250–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS36Website Clutch
–
Algomine too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1250–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15%35Website Clutch
–
Billennium too little client evidence
n/a1000-99995.0 · 1n/an/an/arecommendation systems 15% Java35Website Clutch KRS
–
co.brick too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.7 · 550–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% Google Cloud35Website Clutch
–
Crunch-IS too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1625–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% Python35Website Clutch
–
Devopsity too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1050–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% AWS35Website Clutch
–
Future Processing too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.7 · 5150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Azure35Website Clutch
–
MobiDev Corporation too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 1650–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15%35Website Portfolio Clutch
–
SDLC Corp too little client evidence
n/a1000-99995.0 · 1925–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 13% Android35Website Clutch
–
SoftKraft too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% Python35Website Clutch
–
Zoolatech too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 1850–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% AWS35Website Clutch
–
10Clouds Financial Institutions too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 9550–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS34Website Clutch
–
26bitz under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% AWS34Website Clutch
–
Aligned Code too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% AWS34Website Clutch
–
Binariks too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 6650–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% .NET34Website Clutch
–
CODEAGENCY too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 925–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% Android34Website Clutch
–
Fabrity too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.7 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Azure34Website Clutch
–
Infograins Software Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 8950–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% iOS and Swift34Website Clutch
–
IT Flow AI under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 20% Python34Website Clutch
–
CodeWith under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 425–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15% TypeScript33Website Clutch
–
datarockets too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2250–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10%33Website Clutch
–
Insightland too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 550–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 15%33Website Clutch
–
Pynest too little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Python33Website Clutch
–
Yalantis too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.8 · 7950–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS33Website Clutch
–
Atomic Actions too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Python32Website Clutch
–
Brival based in Częstochowa; local office unconfirmed
n/a10-495.0 · 16100–149 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% TypeScript32Website Clutch
–
Geeknauts too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1325–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% TypeScript32Website Clutch
–
Helpware Tech too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 3050–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS32Website Clutch
–
Hygge Software too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1525–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Android32Website Clutch
–
PixelPlex too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3350–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Flutter32Website Clutch
–
Synergy Labs too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4550–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Flutter32Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Zealous System too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.6 · 24n/an/an/arecommendation systems 15% Shopify32Website Clutch
–
Blackthorn Vision too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 2425–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% .NET31Website Portfolio Clutch
–
EL Passion too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 5850–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Node.js31Website Clutch
–
Shelpuk AI Technology Consulting too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1050–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10%31Website Clutch
–
UASOFTDEV too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS31Website Clutch
–
8allocate too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.7 · 2550–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Databricks and Snowflake30Website Clutch
–
datarabbit too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 5n/an/an/arecommendation systems 10% Python30Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Eastoner too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 525–49 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% .NET30Website Clutch
–
Nozomi too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% iOS and Swift30Website Clutch
–
Madiff too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 450–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Azure29Website Clutch
–
Readiy too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2n/an/an/arecommendation systems 10% AWS28Website Clutch
–
SaM Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.5 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/arecommendation systems 10% Magento (Adobe Commerce)26Website Clutch

Who is not in the top 10, and why

Service-area listings without confirmed local offices 3

A Clutch service-area listing does not establish an office. These records lack the location evidence required for this ranking. A paid placement by itself does not lower the score.

  • Tallium (paid) · Rzeszów
  • Simform (paid)
  • Leobit (paid)

Struck off the register or in liquidation 1

They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.

  • KITRUM · Warsaw

Body leasing, product companies and other services 11

Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.

  • N-iX · Kraków
  • Scalo · Wrocław
  • Techstack company · Wrocław
  • EffectiveSoft · Warsaw
  • Siili Solutions · Wrocław
  • Coherent Solutions · Wrocław
  • Emerline · Warsaw
  • anchor.team · Poznań
  • Coreteka · Wrocław
  • FlairsTech · Warsaw
  • Bright Coders' Factory · Opole

Website not confirmed 1

The data lacks a confirmed link between the website and the registered company. The company remains unranked until the entity behind the filings and reviews is identified.

  • Clover Dynamics · Kraków

Ranked 11th and below 39

They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.

  • Momentum · Wrocław
  • Synergy Codes · Wrocław
  • Relevant Software · Warsaw
  • Apzumi · Poznań
  • Innowise · Warsaw
  • Framna · Gdańsk
  • Darly Solutions · Warsaw
  • SolveIt · Warsaw
  • deepsense.ai · Warsaw
  • Lember · Wrocław
  • Neti · Rzeszów
  • Stepwise · Warsaw
  • + 27 more in the full table

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders 17

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • The Force Code · Wrocław
  • PinoByte
  • Geniusee (paid) · Warsaw
  • Neontri
  • EfficientWeb
  • Seven Bison
  • VolHan
  • LemonMind.com
  • BeeCommerce.pl
  • Engipulse
  • Billennium
  • 26bitz
  • + 5 more in the full table

Weak evidence for recommendation systems 69

They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.

  • Upside
  • Five Jars
  • Romaniuk AI
  • Empat
  • Onely
  • KnubiSoft
  • Cleveroad (paid)
  • Jellyfish.tech
  • Cody Solutions
  • Celadonsoft
  • Reenbit
  • Appunite
  • + 57 more in the full table

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h 42 (+3 no PL office)
50-99 USD/h 98
100-149 USD/h 7
150-199 USD/h 0
Rates declared on Clutch, 148 companies with an office in Poland. In brackets: companies “serving” Poland without an office.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Ask for an A/B test result from a live store or app, not offline metrics. A recommender pays off only when it moves conversion or retention.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of November 2, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best recommendation and personalization system companies in Poland in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Stratoflow (78), 2. Netguru (73), 3. JCD.PL (72), 4. DBB Software (70), 5. Deviniti (67). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company in the data set.

How much do recommendation systems agencies in Poland charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does recommendation systems?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or the Wrocław company catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,494 companies in the data set
  • 731 with KRS records
  • 462 with a financial statement
  • 7,436 Clutch listing records
  • 690 employee review profiles on GoWork

Sources: Clutch profiles and listings, KRS records, available financial statements from rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository, GoWork reviews, JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs listings, and the Wrocław company catalog. Coverage varies by company; dates and links accompany the available records. The 0 to 100 score combines five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Paid Clutch placements do not increase the score.

Disclosures

  • Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, source links and dates accompany the available company records.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Best software development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked by registers, filings and reviews, out of 1472 checked across Poland. Best recommendation systems software houses in Wrocław 9 companies ranked out of 25 with recommendation systems evidence in Wrocław. Best recommendation systems software houses in Warsaw 10 companies ranked out of 71 with recommendation systems evidence in Warsaw. Best recommendation systems software houses in Kraków 6 companies ranked out of 24 with recommendation systems evidence in Kraków. Best React development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 442 with React evidence in Poland. Best TypeScript development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 221 with TypeScript evidence in Poland. Best Next.js development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 106 with Next.js evidence in Poland. Best Node.js development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 340 with Node.js evidence in Poland. Best AI agent development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 118 with AI agents evidence in Poland. Best MCP server and AI integration companies in Poland 6 companies ranked out of 7 with MCP servers and AI integrations evidence in Poland. Best LLM and generative AI development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 337 with LLM and generative AI evidence in Poland. Best forward deployed AI engineering companies in Poland 6 companies ranked out of 12 with forward deployed AI engineering evidence in Poland.
Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center