ciunkos.comRankings

Next.js in Warsaw, ranked for 2027

Best Next.js software houses in Warsaw

Przemysław Zalewski·Data verified: ·26 min read

Check where they host: Vercel, Cloudflare or their own Node servers, and who pays the bill once traffic grows. Ask for a live site with good Core Web Vitals, since Next.js makes slow sites as easily as fast ones. I found 47 companies with an office in Warsaw that show Next.js work in at least one source (46 by their Clutch profile, 2 by their open roles on JustJoin.it), and checked each in the court register, its latest filing and its employee reviews. 40 meet the ranking criteria and the 10 highest scores are below. If one senior engineer is enough, I build Next.js sites and apps with AI agents.

In short: The highest-scoring Next.js software houses in Warsaw for 2027 are Innowise (score 84), Darly Solutions (score 76) and Cowchain (score 74). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.

Get matched offers in 24 hoursSee the top 10Download the data (CSV)

  • 47companies checked
  • 16verified in KRS
  • 16with a financial statement
  • 17with an employee review profile
  • 10ranked

Which company fits your project

  • InnowiseNext.js is 10% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 84, 4.9 on Clutch from 73 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • Darly SolutionsNext.js is 10% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 76, 5.0 on Clutch from 34 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • CowchainNext.js is 20% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 74, 5.0 on Clutch from 36 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • WebalizeNext.js is 20% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 74, 5.0 on Clutch from 19 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • One senior instead of a teamIf the project fits one person with coding agents, hire me for Next.js sites and apps before you pay an agency margin.

The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows Next.js work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.

The top 10 at a glance

Click a column to sort.

#CompanyPeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Innowiseprofit 3M PLN (2025)GoWork 65/10
1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/hCustom software84
2
Darly Solutionsprofit 321K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 3450–99 USD/hCustom software76
3
Cowchainprofit 83K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 3625–49 USD/hWeb3 full-stack74
4
Webalizeprofit 144K PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 1925–49 USD/hCustom web applications74
5
Oxagileprofit 135K PLN (2025)
250-9994.9 · 17n/a73
6
Boring Owlprofit 153K PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h72
7
Sigma Software Groupprofit 909K PLN (2025)
1000-99994.8 · 3750–99 USD/hAI-powered software engineering71
8
Sinova Developmentprofit 182K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 750–99 USD/hAI71
9
Mobile Realityloss 65K PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 1950–99 USD/hAI70
10
Qodecaprofit 486K PLN (2025)GoWork 4/13
50-2495.0 · 950–99 USD/hTech advisory70

The ranking

The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how strong the Next.js evidence is. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.

Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.

Innowise

Very large outsourcing and staff augmentation company with a Warsaw headquarters claim and a catalog covering almost every technology.

Clutch: 4.9 (73 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Teams that must add several developers quickly and can manage an outsourced team under their own tech lead.

Pros

  • The Polish company reported 251.2M PLN of revenue and a profit of 3.0M PLN in its 2025 filing.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 73 reviews.
  • GoWork employee reviews lean positive, with 65 positive and 10 negative.
  • The site lists ISO 9001, ISO 27001 and ISO 13485.

Cons

  • The margin is thin, with profit at about one percent of revenue.
  • The case studies page names no clients and warns that details may be generalized or modified. The portfolio cannot be checked.
  • The Polish company dates from 2021, while the site claims 2007. The footer gives a registered address in Boston, and the job boards showed no open roles at the last snapshot.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page claims 3,500+ people, 1,600 projects and a founding year of 2007. The Polish company in KRS dates from 2021 (source).
  • The FAQ names Warsaw as headquarters, while the footer gives a registered address in Boston, MA (source).
  • The case studies page names no clients and warns that client details may be generalized or modified (source).
  • Innowise sells staff augmentation openly, promising CVs in 1 to 2 days and a team joining in 3 to 5 days (source).

Clients they name: Hays, Spar, Tietoevry, Topcon, NTT Data, Commercial Bank of Qatar

Custom software developmentStaff augmentation and dedicated teamsTesting and QAData, AI and MLERP and CRMLegacy modernizationAI
Innowise homepage
Homepage of innowise.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Innowise.

Verdict. Use Innowise for staff augmentation under your own tech lead when you need CVs fast across many technologies. Skip it when you need a partner whose past work you can verify.

Darly Solutions

Software company of 100+ engineers building web and mobile products for healthcare, fintech and SaaS startups.

Clutch: 5.0 (34 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 1,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Seed and Series A health-tech startups that need a TypeScript web app in Vue.js or Next.js, from MVP onward.

Pros

  • Profitable in 2025, with 321K PLN of profit on 5.4M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 34 reviews, with a Premier Verified badge.
  • Clutch lists a $1,000 minimum project, so a small audit is possible.
  • Healthcare case studies cover clinical trial data, neuroscanning and clinic networks.

Cons

  • Staff augmentation leads the cooperation models, so expect team rental offers.
  • Most case studies hide the client name.
  • The Polish company dates from 2022, while the site claims work since 2016.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page dates the team to 2016 and claims 100+ engineers. (source)
  • Staff augmentation is the first of three cooperation models on the home page. (source)
  • The home page describes a platform for 108 REVIV clinics in 47 countries. (source)
  • The terms name DARLY SOLUTIONS SP. Z O.O. at the registered Warsaw address. (source)

Clients they name: Feliz & Thriving, REVIV

Custom software developmentWeb development (Vue, React, Next.js)Mobile app developmentUI/UX designQA and testingStaff augmentation and dedicated teamsAI
Darly Solutions homepage
Homepage of darly.solutions, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Darly Solutions.

Verdict. Choose Darly for a health-tech MVP or web product. If you need a long Polish track record, check the 2022 registration first.

Cowchain

Web3 development team building dApps, smart contracts, DeFi and AI agent platforms for crypto startups.

Clutch: 5.0 (36 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Crypto startup that needs a DeFi protocol, bridge or dApp built by a Web3 team.

Pros

  • Works only in Web3, with dApps, DeFi and smart contracts as core work.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 36 reviews.
  • Shows shipped products such as RetroBridge, with $200M bridged volume.
  • Clutch lists rates of $25 to $49 an hour.

Cons

  • The Polish company reported only 109K PLN of revenue in 2025 while the site claims 50+ developers.
  • The site lists no address or legal entity, so check who signs the contract.
  • The site shows little Rust or embedded C++ work.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The site gives no address or legal entity, only the name Cowchain Co. in the footer. (source)
  • The home page claims 50+ Web3-native developers. (source)
  • The RetroBridge case claims $200M bridged volume and 1M+ transactions. (source)
  • GoodFirms lists cowchain.io at Chałubińskiego 8 in Warsaw, the KRS address. (source)

Clients they name: RetroBridge, StepApp, GMX Blueberry Club, agnt.hub, Hybrid

Web3 full-stack developmentSmart contracts and DeFiBlockchain consultingWhite-label solutionsWeb3 UI/UX designSmart contract security audits
Cowchain homepage
Homepage of cowchain.io, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Cowchain.

Verdict. Pick Cowchain for a Web3 product built by a crypto-native team, after checking the contracting entity. Skip it outside blockchain.

Webalize

Warsaw software house building Next.js web apps and headless e-commerce on Shopware and Shopify with a small senior team.

Clutch: 5.0 (19 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 5,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Online stores and B2B brands that need a headless Shopify or Shopware front end in Next.js and TypeScript.

Pros

  • Profitable in 2025, with 144K PLN of profit on 1.2M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 19 reviews, with a $5,000 minimum project.
  • Named projects include the ERP-linked B2B platform for Domax and the headless Shopware rebuild for MyBasic.
  • Clutch rates sit at $25–49 per hour.

Cons

  • Clutch puts Shopware at 70% of its e-commerce work and Shopify at only 20%.
  • A small team limits how many parallel projects it can take.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page promises a small senior team with no juniors and Next.js work past basic routing. (source)
  • Projects include a headless Shopware and Next.js rebuild for MyBasic and a Shopify Hydrogen store for a techno club. (source)
  • Clutch splits its e-commerce work into 70% Shopware, 20% Shopify and 10% Medusa. (source)
  • The about page cites a 2026 Clutch listing as a top Next.js developer in Warsaw. (source)

Clients they name: Warsaw University of Technology, TerraLink Cloud Solutions, Dokumentis, Domax, Order of Malta in Estonia, MyBasic, Finch Capital, Wiedza i Praktyka

Custom web applicationsE-commerce development (Shopware, Shopify)Product design and UX/UILegacy modernizationAutomation and AI featuresMaintenance and support
Webalize homepage
Homepage of webalize.me, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Webalize.

Verdict. Pick Webalize for a Next.js storefront or a mid-size web app. Skip it for native mobile apps or large staffing needs.

Oxagile

Clutch: 4.9 (17 reviews)Rate: n/aMin. project: n/a

Pros

  • Profit of 135K PLN (2025)
  • Owned by private individuals (KRS)

Cons

  • n/a
Oxagile homepage
Homepage of oxagile.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Oxagile.

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and stability. Weakest axis: activity (1.5/5).

Boring Owl

Clutch: 5.0 (12 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USD

Pros

  • Profit of 153K PLN (2025)
  • Owned by private individuals (KRS)

Cons

  • n/a
Boring Owl homepage
Homepage of boringowl.io, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Boring Owl.

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and specialization. Weakest axis: activity (1.5/5).

Sigma Software Group

Ukrainian-Swedish engineering group with offices in Warsaw, Kraków and Poznań, doing modernization, data and AI work.

Clutch: 4.8 (37 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 50,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Enterprise that needs a large modernization, data or cloud program staffed across several countries.

Pros

  • Can staff large programs from 2000+ engineers in several countries.
  • Keeps long client relationships, such as 15+ years on Formpipe’s ECM portfolio.
  • Profitable in Poland in 2025, with 0.9M PLN of profit on 28M PLN of revenue.
  • Had 11 open roles at the last snapshot, 10 of them remote.

Cons

  • A large group, so a small project may get little senior attention.
  • Clutch sets a $50,000 minimum project.
  • The pages I checked show no Rust case study.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The Poland contact page lists offices in Kraków, Poznań and Warsaw and says the company works in Poland since 2014. (source)
  • The about page claims 2000+ IT experts and 43 offices in 21 countries. (source)
  • The about page says Sigma Software LLC runs delivery centers in Ukraine and Poland and joined Sweden’s Sigma Group in 2006. (source)
  • The home page describes 15+ years as Formpipe’s engineering partner and a 50% IT cost cut for SAS budgeting. (source)

Clients they name: SAS, Formpipe

AI-powered software engineeringDigital product developmentData engineeringCloud and infrastructureCybersecurityEmbedded and IoTPythonAWSJavaScriptGo
Sigma Software Group homepage
Homepage of sigma.software, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Sigma Software Group.

Verdict. Pick Sigma Software for a big enterprise program that needs scale. Skip it for an MVP under $50,000.

Sinova Development

Clutch: 5.0 (7 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USD

Pros

  • Profit of 182K PLN (2025)
  • Owned by private individuals (KRS)

Cons

  • n/a
AI
Sinova Development homepage
Homepage of sinova.dev, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Sinova Development.

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and specialization. Weakest axis: activity (1.5/5).

Mobile Reality

Clutch: 5.0 (19 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 5,000 USDPremier Verified

Pros

  • Owned by private individuals (KRS)

Cons

  • Loss of -65K PLN (2025)
AI
Mobile Reality homepage
Homepage of mobilereality.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Mobile Reality.

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and specialization. Weakest axis: activity (2.0/5).

Qodeca

Warsaw software house building apps, websites and back-office systems for fitness, sport and healthcare brands.

Clutch: 5.0 (9 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Fitness club or wellness chain that needs a member app, a booking flow or a Webflow site.

Pros

  • Focuses on fitness and sport, with The Bay Club, EOS Fitness and PureGym Arabia as named clients.
  • Has kept The Bay Club as a client for almost 10 years.
  • Uses Webflow for client sites, as in the PureGym Arabia migration.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 9 reviews.

Cons

  • Thin margin in 2025, with 486K PLN of profit on 22.5M PLN of revenue.
  • The site shows almost no work outside fitness and health, and no travel clients.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page positions Qodeca for leaders in fitness, sport and healthcare (source).
  • The about page claims 70 employees and 10 years of experience (source).
  • A Bay Club testimonial says the cooperation has run for almost 10 years (source).
  • The PureGym Arabia case study covers a Webflow migration and a bilingual website (source).

Clients they name: The Bay Club Company, EOS Fitness, PureGym Arabia, Exerfly, MedSimples, Kaam Care, ALIVE3D

Tech advisoryApp developmentCustom software developmentProduct designMVP developmentMembership sales and customer engagement solutions
Qodeca homepage
Homepage of www.qodeca.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Qodeca.

Verdict. Pick Qodeca for a member app, booking flow or club back office in fitness or wellness. Look elsewhere for projects outside that niche.

Every company we checked

The table below has the 47 companies with Next.js evidence in Warsaw, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.

Show all 47 companies
Size: Rate: · 47
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
InnowiseCustom software
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/h251.2M PLN3M PLNCustom software84WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
2
Darly SolutionsCustom software
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3450–99 USD/h5.4M PLN321K PLNCustom software76WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
3
CowchainWeb3 full-stack
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3625–49 USD/h109K PLN83K PLNWeb3 full-stack74WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
4
WebalizeCustom web applications
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1925–49 USD/h1.2M PLN144K PLNCustom web applications74WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
5
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 17n/a2.1M PLN135K PLN73WebsiteClutchKRS
6
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h1.9M PLN153K PLN72WebsiteClutchKRS
7
Sigma Software GroupAI-powered software engineering
n/a1000-99994.8 · 3750–99 USD/h28M PLN909K PLNAI-powered software engineering71WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
8
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 750–99 USD/h1.1M PLN182K PLNAI71WebsiteClutchKRS
9
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1950–99 USD/h2.6M PLN-65K PLNAI70WebsiteClutchKRS
10
QodecaTech advisory
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 950–99 USD/h22.5M PLN486K PLNTech advisory70WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Clurgotoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.3 · 1125–49 USD/h27.5M PLN205K PLNEnterprise app modernization76WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Stepwisetoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 2950–99 USD/h800K PLN-355K PLNAI assessment and strategy68WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
FASTSITEtoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 725–49 USD/h46K PLN1K PLN66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Logic Softwebsite not confirmed
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1325–49 USD/h399K PLN17K PLNAI66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Dynevo Grouptoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 825–49 USD/h4.1M PLN-177K PLN62WebsiteClutchKRS
–
PRAStoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 925–49 USD/h5K PLN-15K PLN57WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Blazitytoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2750–99 USD/hn/an/aTypeScript54WebsiteClutch
–
TeaCodetoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 3850–99 USD/hn/an/aAI54WebsiteClutch
–
Yellowtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 6050–99 USD/hn/an/aAI50WebsiteClutch
–
ACW Soft Solutionstoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/a48WebsiteClutch
–
Celadonsofttoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/aAI48WebsiteClutch
–
Airnautstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3150–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Brocoderstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3950–99 USD/hn/an/aAI47WebsiteClutch
–
Devox Softwaretoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 4550–99 USD/hn/an/aAI47WebsiteClutch
–
eintoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3250–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Five Jarstoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 32100–149 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
FocusReactivetoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2950–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Orangesofttoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4250–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Pynesttoo little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/aAI46WebsiteClutch
–
Ftechtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1725–49 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
PixelPlextoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3350–99 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
SDLC Corptoo little client evidence
n/a1000-99995.0 · 1925–49 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
Humain Dev Systemstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1425–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
iomicotoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
MVP Development Companytoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 2350–99 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Quantumtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1550–99 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
Wise Visiontoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1225–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Yojjitoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1325–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Aligned Codetoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
EL Passiontoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 5850–99 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
CodeWithunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 425–49 USD/hn/an/a42WebsiteClutch
–
CleverLabstoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/aAI40WebsiteClutch
–
INtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 425–49 USD/hn/an/aAI40WebsiteClutch
–
Readiytoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2n/an/an/a40WebsiteClutch
–
EMFIREtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 225–49 USD/hn/an/a39WebsiteClutch
–
DigiWaytoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.4 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/a37WebsiteClutch
–
IT Flow AIunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/aAI37WebsiteClutch

All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.

Who is not in the top 10, and why

Paid placements and “serves the city” without an office

On the Clutch city list the first positions are bought with ads (links through ppc.clutch.co) or a “serves” entry. These companies have no office in the city according to KRS or their own site, so they are not ranked here.

None in this city.

Struck off the register or in liquidation

They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.

None in this city.

Body leasing, product companies and other services

Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.

None in this city.

On the city’s Clutch list, but based elsewhere

Clutch shows them on this city’s page, but KRS and our data do not confirm an office here. They are ranked in their own city.

None in this city.

Ranked 11th and below

They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.

  • Stepwise
  • FASTSITE
  • Dynevo Group
  • PRAS
  • Blazity
  • TeaCode
  • Yellow
  • ACW Soft Solutions
  • Celadonsoft
  • Airnauts
  • Brocoders
  • Devox Software
  • and 18 more in the full table

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • Clurgo
  • Logic Soft
  • CodeWith
  • IN
  • Readiy
  • EMFIRE
  • IT Flow AI

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h1850-99 USD/h26100-149 USD/h1150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 45 companies with an office in the city. In brackets: companies “serving” the city without an office.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Check where they host: Vercel, Cloudflare or their own Node servers, and who pays the bill once traffic grows. Ask for a live site with good Core Web Vitals, since Next.js makes slow sites as easily as fast ones.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement on rejestr.io: revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 28, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best Next.js software houses in Warsaw in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Innowise (84), 2. Darly Solutions (76), 3. Cowchain (74), 4. Webalize (74), 5. Oxagile (73). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.

How much do Next.js agencies in Warsaw charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does Next.js?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,485companies in the data set
  • 708checked in the National Court Register
  • 453with a financial statement
  • 7,436Clutch listing positions read, paid ones marked
  • 451employee review profiles on GoWork
  • 2+months of data collection, since September 2026

The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.

Disclosures

  • I worked at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product until November 2026. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Best software houses in Warsaw10 agencies ranked by registers, filings and reviews, out of 489 checked.Best Next.js development companies in Poland10 companies ranked out of 104 with Next.js evidence in Poland.Best Next.js software houses in Kraków7 companies ranked out of 18 with Next.js evidence in Kraków.Best React software houses in Warsaw10 companies ranked out of 165 with React evidence in Warsaw.Best TypeScript software houses in Warsaw10 companies ranked out of 81 with TypeScript evidence in Warsaw.Best AI agents software houses in Warsaw10 companies ranked out of 141 with AI agents evidence in Warsaw.Best startups and MVPs software houses in Warsaw10 companies ranked out of 98 with startups and MVPs evidence in Warsaw.Best React Native software houses in Warsaw10 companies ranked out of 109 with React Native evidence in Warsaw.Best mobile app development software houses in Warsaw10 companies ranked out of 125 with mobile app development evidence in Warsaw.Best e-commerce software houses in Warsaw10 companies ranked out of 82 with e-commerce evidence in Warsaw.Best healthcare software houses in Warsaw10 companies ranked out of 90 with healthcare evidence in Warsaw.Best DevOps and cloud software houses in Warsaw10 companies ranked out of 60 with DevOps and cloud evidence in Warsaw.
Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center