116 companies with evidence of chatbots and conversational AI work in Warsaw; 42 meet the ranking criteria. Sources: 115 by their Clutch profile, 4 by their own website, KRS records, available financial statements and employee reviews. If one senior engineer is enough, I build AI features with AI agents.
Best for: Telecom, media and OTT companies that need mobile, TV or set-top-box apps and want prices on paper before the first call.
Verdict. Pick N7 Mobile for OTT and mobile work, where it has the clearest pricing on this list and operator-scale telecom projects. For a small web MVP, its team prices start high.
Pros
Net profit of 575,600 PLN in 2025 on 13,700,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 5/5 from 10 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Best for: Small businesses that need a WordPress site, a web app or a simple mobile app at offshore-band rates.
Verdict. Develtio fits websites and small apps, where its client reviews matter more than scale. The filings do not support the team size on the site, so ask who will do the work.
Pros
Net profit of 51,000 PLN in 2025 on 4,200,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 5/5 from 41 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Best for: Proptech and fintech firms that want an AI agent or LLM feature added to a React and Node.js product.
Verdict. Use Mobile Reality to add AI features to a proptech or fintech product. For a large regulated system, ask about team size and who does the work.
Pros
Clutch rating of 5/5 from 19 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
AI agents and automationCustom LLM developmentWeb development (React, Node.js)Mobile development (React Native)CTO and fractional AI officer as a serviceDevOps and AWSAI
Homepage of themobilereality.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Mobile Reality.
Best for: Mid-size and large companies rolling out Microsoft Dynamics, Salesforce or an ERP that want a global vendor with a Polish invoice.
Verdict. Pick Itransition for Dynamics, Salesforce or ERP rollouts at company scale. For a small custom product, the 25,000 USD minimum and the global delivery model are a poor fit.
Pros
Net profit of 3,600,000 PLN in 2025 on 83,400,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 42 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
The contact page lists an office in Warszawa. (2026-10-28 · source)
Cons
Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Discrepancy: company website: 3000+ people, but the Polish entity had 83.4M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity
Projects & technologies
Source observations
The homepage claims 3,000+ engineers, 800+ clients and over 25 years in business. The Polish company in KRS dates from 2017 (source).
The homepage names only two clients, and most case studies describe an unnamed retailer, pharma company or manufacturer (source).
Clutch lists 12 offices, with headquarters in Decatur, GA, and Warsaw among them. The source records contain no accessible office list from the company website (source).
The site lists a Microsoft partnership since 2008, plus Odoo Silver, Salesforce and AWS partnerships (source).
Best for: Companies that need a large dedicated team fast, across many technologies, and can run it with their own product owner.
Verdict. Use Andersen to scale a team you lead, backed by 129 Clutch reviews. Check who signs the contract, given the thin Polish margin and the multi-entity setup.
Pros
Net profit of 363,200 PLN in 2025 on 177,100,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 129 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Team extensionCustom software developmentAI consulting and Claude implementationGenAI and AI developmentData analytics and data annotationCloud migration and DevOpsPythonReactAngularAI
Homepage of globaldev.tech, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to GLOBALDEV.
They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.
KITRUM
Body leasing, product companies and other services 4
Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.
Commoditech
EffectiveSoft
FlairsTech
ImproveIT Solutions
Ranked 11th and below 32
They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.
Order Group
Sinova Development
Euristiq
Innowise
WEBSENSA
Azati Software
CleverDev Software
Oxagile
FREYSOFT
Modsen
Primotly
Mainsoft
+ 20 more in the full table
Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders 24
Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.
Geniusee (paid)
BeeCommerce.pl
EMFIRE
SoftwiseAI
Atomify
CodiLime
CodeWith
Readiy
IN-FOMO.
Neontri
TUATARA
NVT
+ 12 more in the full table
Weak evidence for chatbots and conversational AI 45
They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.
Startup House
Brocoders
Fabrity
Lomray Software
Nozomi
KnubiSoft
SLON Media
Dashbouquet Development
Fulcrum
EL Passion
Empat
CleverLabs
+ 33 more in the full table
What they charge
On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.
For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.
25-49 USD/h43
50-99 USD/h63
100-149 USD/h5
150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 111 companies with an office in the city.
Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes
Ask for a bot in production with its containment rate (questions solved without a human) and how it hands over to people. Most chatbot failures are bad handover, not bad language.
Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.
Get offers from the best-fit agencies
Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours
Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.
How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of November 2, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.
Questions
What are the best chatbots and conversational AI software houses in Warsaw in 2027?
By the score on this page: 1. N7 Mobile (91), 2. Flobotics (85), 3. MITRIX Technology (85), 4. Develtio (79), 5. Civitta (78). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company in the data set.
How much do chatbots and conversational AI agencies in Warsaw charge?
Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.
How do you know a company does chatbots and conversational AI?
From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or the Wrocław company catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.
Did any company pay to be on this list?
No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.
Can I get my company added or corrected?
Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.
How this ranking was made
1,494companies in the data set
731with KRS records
462with a financial statement
7,436Clutch listing records
690employee review profiles on GoWork
Sources: Clutch profiles and listings, KRS records, available financial statements from rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository, GoWork reviews, JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs listings, and the Wrocław company catalog. Coverage varies by company; dates and links accompany the available records. The 0 to 100 score combines five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Paid Clutch placements do not increase the score.
Disclosures
Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, source links and dates accompany the available company records.
Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.
“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation
Confidential by default. NDA is standard. I never show your project, name or screenshots without written consent, which is why this site names no clients without permission.
Your code, your accounts. Code and data stay in your repository and accounts. AI tools run with training on your data turned off, and secrets never reach a model.
A handover you can use. Every project ends with the same checklist: a README that gets it running, one architecture diagram, written decisions, CI, a runbook and a recorded walkthrough. It is done when someone outside the project can run it from the docs.
Boring technology where it counts. I pick a stack you can hire for. Anything experimental needs your yes and an exit plan.
Approach matched to your risk appetite. Prototype, product or regulated: the level decides how much autonomy the agents get and how much review and validation each change needs.
Everything checkable. Every number on my pages links to its source. My tools are free, and the idea validator skill is open source (MIT).
My pledge
Reply within 24 hours. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally, not a bot. Weekend messages: by Monday noon.
Late means free. If I am late, the first hour of work is free. You do not have to ask.
Scope in writing within 24 hours. A free 30-minute call with no company deck, then the scope and the price in writing within 24 hours. You decide.
The person who does the work. You talk to the person who does the work. No sales layer, no handoff.
Follow-up only with news. I follow up only when I have something new for you. Never a "did you see my offer".
Honest "not a fit". If I am not the right person, I say so on the call and point you to someone who is.
Develtio 
N7 Mobile
