ciunkos.comRankings

Next.js in Poland, ranked for 2027

Best Next.js development companies in Poland

Check where they host: Vercel, Cloudflare or their own Node servers, and who pays the bill once traffic grows. Ask for a live site with good Core Web Vitals, since Next.js makes slow sites as easily as fast ones. I found 104 companies with an office in Poland that show Next.js work in at least one source (90 by their Clutch profile, 5 by their open roles on JustJoin.it, 13 by my Wrocław catalog), and checked each in the court register, its latest filing and its employee reviews. 74 meet the ranking criteria and the 10 highest scores are below. The top sits in Warsaw (4), Rzeszów (2), Kraków (2), Wrocław (1). If one senior engineer is enough, I build Next.js sites and apps with AI agents.

In short: The highest-scoring Next.js development companies in Poland for 2027 are Innowise (score 84), Blurify (score 84) and Neti (score 81). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.

Get matched offers in 24 hoursSee the top 10Download the data (CSV)

  • 104companies checked
  • 51verified in KRS
  • 48with a financial statement
  • 46with an employee review profile
  • 3paid or office-less positions excluded

Which company fits your project

  • InnowiseNext.js is 10% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 84, 4.9 on Clutch from 73 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • BlurifyNext.js is 11% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 84, 5.0 on Clutch from 26 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • NetiNext.js is 20% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 81, 5.0 on Clutch from 12 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • EdvantisNext.js is 10% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 77, 4.8 on Clutch from 45 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • One senior instead of a teamIf the project fits one person with coding agents, hire me for Next.js sites and apps before you pay an agency margin.

The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows Next.js work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.

The top 10 at a glance

Click a column to sort.

#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Innowiseprofit 3M PLN (2025)GoWork 65/10
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/hCustom software84
2
Blurifyprofit 309K PLN (2025)
Wrocław50-2495.0 · 2650–99 USD/hCustom software84
3
Netiprofit 817K PLN (2025)GoWork 6/0
Rzeszów10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/hBlockchain consulting and architecture81
4
Edvantispaid placementprofit 8.3M PLN (2025)
Rzeszów250-9994.8 · 4525–49 USD/hData engineering, analytics and BI77
5
Darly Solutionsprofit 321K PLN (2025)
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3450–99 USD/hCustom software76
6
DBB Softwareprofit 1.5M PLN (2025)
Kraków50-2495.0 · 3425–49 USD/hAI integration and agentic AI76
7
TechMagicprofit 1.2M PLN (2025)
Kraków250-9994.8 · 5450–99 USD/hWeb and SaaS75
8
Boldareprofit 647K PLN (2025)GoWork 30/40
Gliwice50-2494.8 · 6350–99 USD/hMVP development and digital prototyping74
9
Cowchainprofit 83K PLN (2025)
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3625–49 USD/hWeb3 full-stack74
10
Webalizeprofit 144K PLN (2025)
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1925–49 USD/hCustom web applications74

The ranking

The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how strong the Next.js evidence is. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.

Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.

Innowise

Very large outsourcing and staff augmentation company with a Warsaw headquarters claim and a catalog covering almost every technology.

Clutch: 4.9 (73 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Teams that must add several developers quickly and can manage an outsourced team under their own tech lead.

Pros

  • The Polish company reported 251.2M PLN of revenue and a profit of 3.0M PLN in its 2025 filing.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 73 reviews.
  • GoWork employee reviews lean positive, with 65 positive and 10 negative.
  • The site lists ISO 9001, ISO 27001 and ISO 13485.

Cons

  • The margin is thin, with profit at about one percent of revenue.
  • The case studies page names no clients and warns that details may be generalized or modified. The portfolio cannot be checked.
  • The Polish company dates from 2021, while the site claims 2007. The footer gives a registered address in Boston, and the job boards showed no open roles at the last snapshot.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page claims 3,500+ people, 1,600 projects and a founding year of 2007. The Polish company in KRS dates from 2021 (source).
  • The FAQ names Warsaw as headquarters, while the footer gives a registered address in Boston, MA (source).
  • The case studies page names no clients and warns that client details may be generalized or modified (source).
  • Innowise sells staff augmentation openly, promising CVs in 1 to 2 days and a team joining in 3 to 5 days (source).

Clients they name: Hays, Spar, Tietoevry, Topcon, NTT Data, Commercial Bank of Qatar

Custom software developmentStaff augmentation and dedicated teamsTesting and QAData, AI and MLERP and CRMLegacy modernizationAI
Innowise homepage
Homepage of innowise.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Innowise.

Verdict. Use Innowise for staff augmentation under your own tech lead when you need CVs fast across many technologies. Skip it when you need a partner whose past work you can verify.

Blurify

Wrocław software house building custom web and mobile apps on AWS for education, industry and, on its English site, iGaming.

Clutch: 5.0 (26 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Polish education, industry and public-sector clients who want a 50+ team with a Wrocław office, and iGaming companies through its English brand.

Pros

  • A 5.0 rating on Clutch from 26 reviews with named Polish clients such as Fundacja Orange and WSiP.
  • Profitable in 2025 (309K PLN on 9.3M PLN of revenue), two private individuals as owners (KRS), hiring on the boards (3 open roles).
  • Publishes a three-month warranty on critical bugs after launch and offers a free estimate, which few agencies put in writing.

Cons

  • Two brands, one company: blurify.pl is a general software house, blurify.com sells casino and sportsbook products. Ask which team you get and whether the iGaming side matters to your compliance.
  • The legal entity is Studio Software Sp. z o.o., so search KRS by that name, not “Blurify”.
  • Thin margin: the 2025 profit is a few percent of revenue. Too few employee reviews on GoWork to read the mood.
  • The AWS claim is three individual certifications, not a partner tier.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • blurify.pl presents a general software house for Polish education and industry. blurify.com positions the company as an iGaming developer with casino and sportsbook products (source).
  • The site lists fifteen case studies, several with named Polish clients such as Fundacja Orange, WSiP and WAGO (source).
  • The legal entity is Studio Software Sp. z o.o., which matters when you check the KRS (source).
  • The AWS claim rests on three individual certifications rather than a partner tier (source).

Clients they name: Fundacja Orange (MegaMisja), WSiP, WKS Śląsk Wrocław, WAGO, Vemcon, LifeTraq

Custom softwareWeb appsMobile appsMVPAI solutionsAWS and cloudReactNext.jsNode.jsPostgreSQL
Blurify homepage
Homepage of blurify.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Blurify.

Verdict. Good client reviews and clear written terms, with one question to ask before signing: which of the two businesses would build your product.

Neti

Rzeszów blockchain and payments engineering firm that builds stablecoin, tokenization and DLT infrastructure for fintechs and protocols.

Clutch: 5.0 (12 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Fintechs, payment companies and protocol teams that need blockchain, stablecoin or tokenization engineering beyond a prototype.

Pros

  • Profitable, with 817K PLN of profit on 5.3M PLN of revenue in 2025.
  • GoWork employee reviews are all positive, 6 positive and 0 negative.
  • Holds a 5.0 rating on Clutch from 12 reviews and publishes case studies for Filecoin, Liberland and Kyoto Protocol.

Cons

  • Most of the work is crypto and Web3, so general web products are a side business.
  • The minimum project is 25,000 USD, and the site makes unverifiable claims such as 100% vulnerability-free deployments.
  • Some directories list the wrong domain, and the company site is neti-soft.com.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The domain neti.pl shows a domain-for-sale page, and the company site is neti-soft.com (source).
  • The about page dates the company to 2010 and its move into blockchain and fintech to 2019 (source).
  • The site claims 40+ in-house specialists, 120+ projects and '100% vulnerability-free production deployments', which we could not check (source).
  • Clutch lists 5.0 from 12 reviews, a 25,000 USD minimum and a second address in London (source).

Clients they name: Filecoin Incentive Design Labs (FIDL), Liberland, Kyoto Protocol, Alvarum, FactoryDAO, MaxxChain

Blockchain consulting and architectureSmart contracts and dAppsStablecoin and payment infrastructure (NetiRails)Asset tokenizationZero-knowledge privacyCustom enterprise softwareAI
Neti homepage
Homepage of neti-soft.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Neti.

Verdict. Start with Neti for stablecoins or tokenization. For an ordinary web app, choose a generalist.

Edvantis

Large software and data engineering vendor with Ukrainian roots and a Rzeszów headquarters that sells dedicated teams and AI work.

Clutch: 4.8 (45 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USDPremier VerifiedPaid placement on Clutch

Best for: Mid-size and large companies that need a big dedicated team for data, AI or software engineering at an offshore rate.

Pros

  • Profitable at scale, with a profit of 8.3M PLN on 95.4M PLN of revenue in 2025.
  • Holds a 4.8 rating on Clutch from 45 reviews, an ISO 9001 certificate and a 2023 IAOP Global Outsourcing 100 listing.
  • Publishes named case studies with German clients such as freenet Group and Doc Cirrus.

Cons

  • The brand dates from 2005 with roots in Lviv, the Polish company was registered in 2022, and much of the delivery is outside Poland.
  • The model leans on dedicated teams and staff augmentation, and the 25 to 49 USD rate band is the offshore band.
  • Edvantis pays for a sponsored placement on Clutch, and the site lists no Wrocław office.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The contact page lists offices in Rzeszów, Lviv, Berlin and New York plus remote hubs in seven more countries, with no Wrocław office (source).
  • The site claims work since 2005, 400+ employees and 40+ active customers, while the Polish company in the court register dates from 2022 (source).
  • Edvantis sells staff augmentation from eight locations across North America and Europe (source).
  • Clutch lists 4.8 from 45 reviews, 25 to 49 USD per hour and Rzeszów as headquarters (source).

Clients they name: Alturos Destinations, Doc Cirrus, freenet Group, KPC Labs, Nowtilus, Safety Media

Data engineering, analytics and BIAI engineeringCustom software engineeringDedicated teams and IT staff augmentationSystem integration and IoTCloud migration and RPASalesforceAI
Edvantis homepage
Homepage of edvantis.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Edvantis.

Verdict. Take Edvantis when you need many people, an ISO process and offshore rates. Do not expect a small team based in Poland.

Darly Solutions

Software company of 100+ engineers building web and mobile products for healthcare, fintech and SaaS startups.

Clutch: 5.0 (34 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 1,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Seed and Series A health-tech startups that need a TypeScript web app in Vue.js or Next.js, from MVP onward.

Pros

  • Profitable in 2025, with 321K PLN of profit on 5.4M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 34 reviews, with a Premier Verified badge.
  • Clutch lists a $1,000 minimum project, so a small audit is possible.
  • Healthcare case studies cover clinical trial data, neuroscanning and clinic networks.

Cons

  • Staff augmentation leads the cooperation models, so expect team rental offers.
  • Most case studies hide the client name.
  • The Polish company dates from 2022, while the site claims work since 2016.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page dates the team to 2016 and claims 100+ engineers. (source)
  • Staff augmentation is the first of three cooperation models on the home page. (source)
  • The home page describes a platform for 108 REVIV clinics in 47 countries. (source)
  • The terms name DARLY SOLUTIONS SP. Z O.O. at the registered Warsaw address. (source)

Clients they name: Feliz & Thriving, REVIV

Custom software developmentWeb development (Vue, React, Next.js)Mobile app developmentUI/UX designQA and testingStaff augmentation and dedicated teamsAI
Darly Solutions homepage
Homepage of darly.solutions, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Darly Solutions.

Verdict. Choose Darly for a health-tech MVP or web product. If you need a long Polish track record, check the 2022 registration first.

DBB Software

Software company founded in Dnipro, now headquartered in Kraków, building AI features, web and mobile products with teams in Ukraine and Poland.

Clutch: 5.0 (34 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Startups and SMBs with a defined web, mobile or AI build that want low rates and accept a team working from Ukraine.

Pros

  • Clutch shows 34 reviews with a perfect average and a Premier Verified badge.
  • The Polish company reported a profit of 1.5M PLN on 3.6M PLN of revenue in 2025.
  • The site dates the start in Dnipro to 2015 and the Kraków office to 2021.
  • DBB Software declares ISO/IEC 27001 and AWS Select Tier status.

Cons

  • The Polish company had 3.6M PLN of revenue, while the site claims 100+ engineers, so most delivery likely sits in Ukraine.
  • The declared rate of 25 to 49 USD is the offshore band, so ask who writes the code.
  • The registry entity dates only from 2021 and has minimum share capital.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The timeline says the company was founded in February 2015 in Dnipro, Ukraine, and opened a Kraków office in November 2021 (source).
  • The timeline's latest headcount is 89 people across Dnipro, Lviv and Kraków in August 2023. The homepage claims 100+ engineers (source).
  • The site states ISO/IEC 27001 certification in June 2026 and AWS Select Tier status (source).
  • Clutch lists 34 reviews, a 25 to 49 USD rate band and locations in Kraków and Dnipro (source).

Clients they name: Lakera, Choo Choo, Bookis, Plaace, Doctify, DispatchHealth

AI integration and agentic AIWeb and mobile developmentMVP developmentDedicated teamsCloud and DevOpsUI/UX designAI
DBB Software homepage
Homepage of dbbsoftware.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to DBB Software.

Verdict. Pick DBB Software for a defined web or AI build at low rates, delivered from Ukraine with a Kraków front office. Skip it if you need a team in Poland.

TechMagic

Software product company from Lviv with a Kraków office, focused on healthtech, cloud and cybersecurity.

Clutch: 4.8 (54 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Healthcare and media companies that need a Node.js or Next.js product with security and IoT skills from one vendor.

Pros

  • Profitable in 2025, with 1.2M PLN of profit on 11.5M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 4.8 from 54 reviews, with a Premier Verified badge.
  • The site shows ISO 27001 and CREST badges, useful for healthcare buyers.
  • Its security team sells penetration testing next to development.

Cons

  • The home page gives three different team sizes, 350+, 400+ and 320+.
  • The Polish company shares its registered address with Incode Group, a sign of a virtual office.
  • Clutch lists a $25,000 minimum project.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page gives three team sizes, 350+, 400+ and 320+. (source)
  • The Kraków office sits in a coworking space on Zamoyskiego, while the register lists Szlak 77/222. (source)
  • The site shows ISO 27001 and CREST badges and sells penetration testing next to development. (source)
  • Clutch ties the Polish company Techmagic PL Sp. z o.o. to KRS 0000969230. (source)

Clients they name: Elements.cloud, Huckleberry, Bamboo, Tiro.health, Acorn-i, Good&Co, Corellium, MyTelescope

Web and SaaS developmentCybersecurity and penetration testingCloud and DevOps (AWS, Azure, GCP)AI and generative AIIoT developmentUI/UX designAI
TechMagic homepage
Homepage of www.techmagic.co, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to TechMagic.

Verdict. Pick TechMagic for a healthtech or security-heavy product with compliance needs. On a small budget, its $25,000 minimum rules it out.

Boldare

Gliwice-headquartered digital product and AI company with a Wrocław office that builds MVPs and products for startups and enterprises.

Clutch: 4.8 (63 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Funded startups and companies that want an MVP or a product redesign led by product design.

Pros

  • Clutch shows 63 reviews averaging 4.8, one of the longest client review records in this list.
  • Boldare reported a profit of 647K PLN on 21.2M PLN of revenue in 2025.
  • Prototyping, MVP and design are core services, with named case studies such as DTIQ and Caidio.
  • Boldare has offices in Wrocław, Kraków and Warsaw besides its Gliwice seat.

Cons

  • GoWork opinions are more negative than positive (30 positive, 40 negative), with 12 mentions of layoffs.
  • GoWork got 9 positive reviews within two weeks from 2022-01-11.
  • Team size claims differ, with 100+ on the homepage and 200+ on the about page.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • Wrocław is one of four Polish offices, and the headquarters and legal seat are in Gliwice (source).
  • The about page claims 2004 roots and 200+ people in 6 European offices, while the home page says 100+ people and the footer lists 4 Polish offices (source: https://www.boldare.com/about/ and https://www.boldare.com/).
  • Boldare S.A. holds KRS 0000914518 from 2021, so the 2004 date refers to predecessor companies (source).
  • The company runs on holacracy and sells fixed-scope AI packages, including Claude Code adoption, without listing prices (source).
  • The only company-focused YouTube video announces a racing partnership, and the rest of the channel is a podcast on AI-native product building (source).

Clients they name: sonnen, BlaBlaCar, ZATCA, YOUCAT Foundation, DTIQ, Humanitas University

MVP development and digital prototypingFull cycle product design and developmentAI software development and consulting (including Claude Code services)UX/UI designCode and UX auditsDevelopment teams and software outsourcingReactNode.jsAI
Boldare homepage
Homepage of boldare.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Boldare.

Verdict. Pick Boldare for an MVP or a product redesign, backed by its design process and 63 client reviews. Given the staff opinions, ask who stays on your team.

Cowchain

Web3 development team building dApps, smart contracts, DeFi and AI agent platforms for crypto startups.

Clutch: 5.0 (36 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Crypto startup that needs a DeFi protocol, bridge or dApp built by a Web3 team.

Pros

  • Works only in Web3, with dApps, DeFi and smart contracts as core work.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 36 reviews.
  • Shows shipped products such as RetroBridge, with $200M bridged volume.
  • Clutch lists rates of $25 to $49 an hour.

Cons

  • The Polish company reported only 109K PLN of revenue in 2025 while the site claims 50+ developers.
  • The site lists no address or legal entity, so check who signs the contract.
  • The site shows little Rust or embedded C++ work.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The site gives no address or legal entity, only the name Cowchain Co. in the footer. (source)
  • The home page claims 50+ Web3-native developers. (source)
  • The RetroBridge case claims $200M bridged volume and 1M+ transactions. (source)
  • GoodFirms lists cowchain.io at Chałubińskiego 8 in Warsaw, the KRS address. (source)

Clients they name: RetroBridge, StepApp, GMX Blueberry Club, agnt.hub, Hybrid

Web3 full-stack developmentSmart contracts and DeFiBlockchain consultingWhite-label solutionsWeb3 UI/UX designSmart contract security audits
Cowchain homepage
Homepage of cowchain.io, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Cowchain.

Verdict. Pick Cowchain for a Web3 product built by a crypto-native team, after checking the contracting entity. Skip it outside blockchain.

Webalize

Warsaw software house building Next.js web apps and headless e-commerce on Shopware and Shopify with a small senior team.

Clutch: 5.0 (19 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 5,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Online stores and B2B brands that need a headless Shopify or Shopware front end in Next.js and TypeScript.

Pros

  • Profitable in 2025, with 144K PLN of profit on 1.2M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 19 reviews, with a $5,000 minimum project.
  • Named projects include the ERP-linked B2B platform for Domax and the headless Shopware rebuild for MyBasic.
  • Clutch rates sit at $25–49 per hour.

Cons

  • Clutch puts Shopware at 70% of its e-commerce work and Shopify at only 20%.
  • A small team limits how many parallel projects it can take.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page promises a small senior team with no juniors and Next.js work past basic routing. (source)
  • Projects include a headless Shopware and Next.js rebuild for MyBasic and a Shopify Hydrogen store for a techno club. (source)
  • Clutch splits its e-commerce work into 70% Shopware, 20% Shopify and 10% Medusa. (source)
  • The about page cites a 2026 Clutch listing as a top Next.js developer in Warsaw. (source)

Clients they name: Warsaw University of Technology, TerraLink Cloud Solutions, Dokumentis, Domax, Order of Malta in Estonia, MyBasic, Finch Capital, Wiedza i Praktyka

Custom web applicationsE-commerce development (Shopware, Shopify)Product design and UX/UILegacy modernizationAutomation and AI featuresMaintenance and support
Webalize homepage
Homepage of webalize.me, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Webalize.

Verdict. Pick Webalize for a Next.js storefront or a mid-size web app. Skip it for native mobile apps or large staffing needs.

Every company we checked

The table below has the 104 companies with Next.js evidence in Poland, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.

Show all 104 companies
Size: Rate: · 104
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
InnowiseCustom software
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/h251.2M PLN3M PLNCustom software84WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
2
BlurifyCustom software
Wrocław50-2495.0 · 2650–99 USD/h9.3M PLN309K PLNCustom software84WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
3
NetiBlockchain consulting and architecture
Rzeszów10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h5.3M PLN817K PLNBlockchain consulting and architecture81WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
4
EdvantisData engineering, analytics and BI
Rzeszów250-9994.8 · 4525–49 USD/h95.4M PLN8.3M PLNData engineering, analytics and BI77WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
5
Darly SolutionsCustom software
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3450–99 USD/h5.4M PLN321K PLNCustom software76WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
6
DBB SoftwareAI integration and agentic AI
Kraków50-2495.0 · 3425–49 USD/h3.6M PLN1.5M PLNAI integration and agentic AI76WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
7
TechMagicWeb and SaaS
Kraków250-9994.8 · 5450–99 USD/h11.5M PLN1.2M PLNWeb and SaaS75WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
8
BoldareMVP development and digital prototyping
Gliwice50-2494.8 · 6350–99 USD/h21.2M PLN647K PLNMVP development and digital prototyping74WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
9
CowchainWeb3 full-stack
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3625–49 USD/h109K PLN83K PLNWeb3 full-stack74WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
10
WebalizeCustom web applications
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1925–49 USD/h1.2M PLN144K PLNCustom web applications74WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Dropticatoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 950–99 USD/h12.6M PLN543K PLNDrupal code audit80WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
N-iXbody leasing
Kraków1000-99994.8 · 3550–99 USD/h15.5M PLN1.2M PLN.NET80WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Akveobased in Warsaw, no office here
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3150–99 USD/h11.3M PLN515K PLNAI agent and LLM79WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Vazcoproduct company
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 1950–99 USD/h10.4M PLN417K PLNTS/React/Node79WebsiteClutchKRS
–
BrainForge ITtoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1850–99 USD/h1.8M PLN158K PLNCustom software78WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Codewaveproduct company
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/h13.8M PLN3.7M PLNJavaScript78WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Sii Polandbody leasing
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 44n/a2155.9M PLN261M PLNwszystko78WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Scalobody leasing
Wrocław250-9994.7 · 3350–99 USD/h162.2M PLN8.1M PLNIT outsourcing77WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Clurgotoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.3 · 1125–49 USD/h27.5M PLN205K PLNEnterprise app modernization76WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Siili Solutionsbody leasing
Wrocław250-9994.9 · 750–99 USD/h37.3M PLN3.4M PLNweb76WebsiteClutchKRS
–
nomtekbased in Wrocław, no office here
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 4450–99 USD/h30.7M PLN-69K PLNMobile app75WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Lembertoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1025–49 USD/h137K PLN70K PLNCustom software74WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
USEObody leasing
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h4M PLN32K PLNReact74WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Oxagiletoo little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 17n/a2.1M PLN135K PLN73WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Boring Owltoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h1.9M PLN153K PLN72WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Brightsbased in Warsaw, no office here
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 4125–49 USD/h8.3M PLNn/aWeb app71WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Sigma Software Grouptoo little client evidence
n/a1000-99994.8 · 3750–99 USD/h28M PLN909K PLNAI-powered software engineering71WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Sinova Developmenttoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 750–99 USD/h1.1M PLN182K PLNAI71WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Univiotoo little client evidence
Wrocław250-9994.7 · 3050–99 USD/h88M PLN-3.2M PLNDigital consulting71WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Mobile Realitytoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1950–99 USD/h2.6M PLN-65K PLNAI70WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Qodecatoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 950–99 USD/h22.5M PLN486K PLNTech advisory70WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Hued.metoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-494.9 · 5n/a2.5M PLN410K PLNCustom applications69WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Naturailytoo little client evidence
Wrocławn/ano Clutch profilen/a8.5M PLN572K PLNNext.js69WebsiteKRS
–
Stepwisetoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 2950–99 USD/h800K PLN-355K PLNAI assessment and strategy68WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Implextoo little client evidence
Kraków50-2495.0 · 2150–99 USD/h3.2M PLN-131K PLNWeb67WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
FASTSITEtoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 725–49 USD/h46K PLN1K PLN66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Incode Grouptoo little client evidence
Kraków50-2495.0 · 3925–49 USD/h2.5M PLN-11K PLNDeveloper hiring66WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Logic Softwebsite not confirmed
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1325–49 USD/h399K PLN17K PLNAI66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Pragmatic Coderstoo little client evidence
Kraków50-2494.8 · 1850–99 USD/h23.1M PLN-531K PLNAI66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Blues Bracketsunder 10 people
Świdnica2-95.0 · 150–99 USD/h482K PLN1K PLNReact65WebsiteClutchKRS
–
IVN (formerly Ivision.pl)marketing agency
Kraków10-494.8 · 650–99 USD/h1.7M PLN347K PLNCorporate websites65WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Dynevo Grouptoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 825–49 USD/h4.1M PLN-177K PLN62WebsiteClutchKRS
–
iMakeabletoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1650–99 USD/hn/an/aWeb and mobile app62WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
GRUPA INSIGHTtoo little client evidence
Marki10-495.0 · 250–99 USD/h1.1M PLN-49K PLNReact61WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Codyatoo little client evidence
Kraków10-495.0 · 525–49 USD/h1.5M PLN-401K PLNAI60WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Kozak Agencytoo little client evidence
Kraków50-2495.0 · 825–49 USD/h1.3M PLN-7K PLNAI and LLM integration59WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Sanddevtoo little client evidence
n/a11-505.0 · 450–99 USD/h2.4M PLN-341K PLNProduction-readiness audits58WebsiteClutchKRS
–
PRAStoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 925–49 USD/h5K PLN-15K PLN57WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Blazitytoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2750–99 USD/hn/an/aTypeScript54WebsiteClutch
–
TeaCodetoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 3850–99 USD/hn/an/aAI54WebsiteClutch
–
Cleveroadtoo little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 8225–49 USD/hn/an/aAI51WebsiteClutch
–
Yellowtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 6050–99 USD/hn/an/aAI50WebsiteClutch
–
ACW Soft Solutionstoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/a48WebsiteClutch
–
Celadonsofttoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/aAI48WebsiteClutch
–
SPEEDNETtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1750–99 USD/hn/an/a48WebsiteClutch
–
Airnautstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3150–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Brocoderstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3950–99 USD/hn/an/aAI47WebsiteClutch
–
Devox Softwaretoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 4550–99 USD/hn/an/aAI47WebsiteClutch
–
eintoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3250–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Five Jarstoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 32100–149 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
FocusReactivetoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2950–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Orangesofttoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4250–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Pageprotoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3450–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Brivalbased in Częstochowa, no office here
n/a10-495.0 · 16100–149 USD/hn/an/aAI46WebsiteClutch
–
Lexogrinetoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2550–99 USD/hn/an/aAI46WebsiteClutch
–
Pynesttoo little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/aAI46WebsiteClutch
–
SysGearstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3025–49 USD/hn/an/aAI46WebsiteClutch
–
co.bricktoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.7 · 550–99 USD/hn/an/aJava45WebsiteClutch
–
Crocodetoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1050–99 USD/hn/an/a45WebsiteClutch
–
Ftechtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1725–49 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
INTechHousetoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1250–99 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
PixelPlextoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3350–99 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
Red Rocket Softwaretoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2925–49 USD/hn/an/a45WebsiteClutch
–
SDLC Corptoo little client evidence
n/a1000-99995.0 · 1925–49 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
26bitzunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
Appunitetoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
CleverCrewtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 825–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
DevsPowertoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Digiatoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1025–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Humain Dev Systemstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1425–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Inigratoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
iomicotoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
MVP Development Companytoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 2350–99 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Quantumtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1550–99 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
The BitByBit Companytoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Wise Visiontoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1225–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Yojjitoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1325–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Aligned Codetoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
Axontoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 4225–49 USD/hn/an/a43WebsiteClutch
–
CODEAGENCYtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 925–49 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
EL Passiontoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 5850–99 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
Altimistruck off KRS
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 825–49 USD/h22 PLNn/aweb/mobile42WebsiteClutchKRS
–
CodeWithunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 425–49 USD/hn/an/a42WebsiteClutch
–
Inspirit Devtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/aAI42WebsiteClutch
–
InterSynergytoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/aAI42WebsiteClutch
–
CleverLabstoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/aAI40WebsiteClutch
–
INtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 425–49 USD/hn/an/aAI40WebsiteClutch
–
Readiytoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2n/an/an/a40WebsiteClutch
–
EMFIREtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 225–49 USD/hn/an/a39WebsiteClutch
–
Aleannlabtoo little client evidence
n/an/ano Clutch profilen/an/an/aReact37WebsiteKRS
–
DigiWaytoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.4 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/a37WebsiteClutch
–
IT Flow AIunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/aAI37WebsiteClutch
–
JSON Crewunder 10 people
n/a2-94.5 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/aAI37WebsiteClutch
–
Twoheadstoo little client evidence
n/an/ano Clutch profilen/an/an/aReact33WebsiteKRS

All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.

Who is not in the top 10, and why

Paid placements and “serves the city” without an office

On the Clutch city list the first positions are bought with ads (links through ppc.clutch.co) or a “serves” entry. These companies have no office in the city according to KRS or their own site, so they are not ranked here.

  • Edvantis (paid) · Rzeszów
  • Brights (paid) · Warsaw
  • Cleveroad (paid)

Struck off the register or in liquidation

They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.

  • Altimi · Wrocław

Body leasing, product companies and other services

Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.

  • N-iX · Kraków
  • Vazco · Wrocław
  • Codewave · Wrocław
  • Sii Poland · Warsaw
  • Scalo · Wrocław
  • Siili Solutions · Wrocław
  • USEO · Wrocław
  • IVN (formerly Ivision.pl) · Kraków

On the city’s Clutch list, but based elsewhere

Clutch shows them on this city’s page, but KRS and our data do not confirm an office here. They are ranked in their own city.

  • Akveo · Warsaw
  • nomtek · Wrocław
  • Brival

Ranked 11th and below

They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.

  • Lember · Wrocław
  • Oxagile · Warsaw
  • Boring Owl · Warsaw
  • Sigma Software Group
  • Sinova Development · Warsaw
  • Mobile Reality · Warsaw
  • Qodeca · Warsaw
  • Hued.me · Wrocław
  • Stepwise · Warsaw
  • Implex · Kraków
  • FASTSITE · Warsaw
  • Incode Group · Kraków
  • and 52 more in the full table

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • Droptica · Wrocław
  • BrainForge IT · Wrocław
  • Clurgo · Warsaw
  • Univio · Wrocław
  • Naturaily · Wrocław
  • Logic Soft · Warsaw
  • Blues Brackets · Świdnica
  • GRUPA INSIGHT · Marki
  • 26bitz
  • CodeWith
  • IN
  • Readiy
  • and 5 more in the full table

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h3650-99 USD/h59100-149 USD/h2150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 97 companies with an office in the city. In brackets: companies “serving” the city without an office.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Check where they host: Vercel, Cloudflare or their own Node servers, and who pays the bill once traffic grows. Ask for a live site with good Core Web Vitals, since Next.js makes slow sites as easily as fast ones.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement on rejestr.io: revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 28, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best Next.js development companies in Poland in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Innowise (84), 2. Blurify (84), 3. Neti (81), 4. Edvantis (77), 5. Darly Solutions (76). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.

How much do Next.js agencies in Poland charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does Next.js?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,485companies in the data set
  • 708checked in the National Court Register
  • 453with a financial statement
  • 7,436Clutch listing positions read, paid ones marked
  • 451employee review profiles on GoWork
  • 2+months of data collection, since September 2026

The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.

Disclosures

  • I worked at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product until November 2026. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center