ciunkos.com Rankings

White-label development for agencies in Poland, ranked for 2027

Best white-label development companies for agencies in Poland

  1. 1 Solidstudio 72
  2. 2 Spyrosoft BSG 71
  3. 3 Qulix 68

13 companies with evidence of white-label development for agencies work in Poland; 8 meet the ranking criteria. Sources: 13 by their own website, KRS records, available financial statements and employee reviews. If one senior engineer is enough, I build white-label builds for agencies with AI agents.

Get matched offers in 24 hours See the top 8 Download the data (CSV)

  • 13 company records
  • 10 with KRS records
  • 10 with a financial statement
  • 6 with an employee review profile
  • 8 ranked

Find your fit

Compare companies

#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Solidstudio profit 2M PLN (2025)
Kraków10-494.8 · 1550–99 USD/hwhite-label development for agencies AWS72
2
Spyrosoft BSG profit 4.1M PLN (2025) GoWork 2/5
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 3050–99 USD/hwhite-label development for agencies AWS71
3
Qulix profit 2.3M PLN (2025)
Wrocław250-9994.9 · 1050–99 USD/hwhite-label development for agencies iOS and Swift68
4
Cowchain profit 83K PLN (2025)
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3625–49 USD/hwhite-label development for agencies React65
5
byVoice profit 241K PLN (2025)
Kraków10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/hwhite-label development for agencies PHP and Laravel65
6
Coditive profit 381K PLN (2025)
Knurów10-494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hwhite-label development for agencies Vue.js65
7
ClearMedia Software House profit 682K PLN (2025)
Biała podlaska10-494.9 · 925–49 USD/hwhite-label development for agencies Vue.js64
8
Netkodo loss 8K PLN (2025)
Toruń10-495.0 · 750–99 USD/hwhite-label development for agencies Shopify60

The ranking

Solidstudio

Kraków company building EV charging software: a charge point management platform, eMSP driver app and OCPP/OCPI gateways.

72/100

Clutch: 4.8 (15 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Google: 5.0 (10 reviews)

Best for: Charge point operators, energy companies and automotive firms that need EV charging management software or a migration of an existing charging platform.

Verdict. Pick Solidstudio if you run or plan an EV charging network and want a proven CPMS with protocol expertise. Skip it for general software outside eMobility.

Pros

  • Net profit of 2,000,000 PLN in 2025 on 18,500,000 PLN revenue. (2026-11-13 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.8/5 from 15 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Published projects: ewe go, GreenWay, Connected Kerb.
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The home page claims 60,000+ charge points under management in 15 markets on 4 continents and 5M+ charging sessions per month, and supports OCPP 1.6 and 2.0.1 and OCPI 2.2.1 (source).
  • The about page says the company has built eMobility software since 2017, lists ISO 27001 and a DEKRA-certified ISMS, and cites a zero-downtime migration of 9,000 sockets for Connected Kerb (source).
  • Awards on the about page: Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Central Europe 2024, ranked #5 in Central Europe and #2 in Poland, and FT1000 2025 at #71 (source).
  • Case studies cover ewe go, GreenWay and Connected Kerb; logos include Siemens, ENGIE, Volvo and Hubject (source).

Clients they name: ewe go, GreenWay, Connected Kerb

CPO platform (CPMS) White-label eMSP driver app EV network intelligence (AI) OCPP, OCPI and OICP gateways Platform migration eMobility consulting
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2016
HQ (KRS)
Kraków
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
57K PLN
Owners
Bvg Fund Coöperatief U.a.; family foundation
Revenue
18.5M PLN (2025)
Profit
2M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Google Business Profile
Solidstudio · 5.0 (10 reviews) (November 11, 2026)
Hiring (last 90 days)
role seen October 5, 2026
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (1/0)

Score: 72/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.6/5 Stability 4.8/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 1.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS GoWork

Sources (9) · Checked November 13, 2026

Spyrosoft BSG

Video and OTT streaming apps for broadcasters, sports leagues and telcos, part of the listed Spyrosoft Group.

71/100

Clutch: 4.9 (30 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD Google: 4.4 (8 reviews)

Best for: Broadcasters and streaming services that need OTT, connected-TV and video apps, with named references at major European channels.

Verdict. For a TV channel or a streaming service, it is the only Wrocław agency with named broadcaster references. For any other product, pick from the rest of the top 10.

Pros

Cons

  • GoWork records 2 positive and 5 negative reviews. These are user opinions, not independently established events. (2026-09-22 · source)
  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • Case studies name broadcasters such as Nordisk Film+, TV 2, ITV and CANAL+, which few Wrocław agencies can show (source).
  • The whole site is about OTT and video apps, so the firm suits media clients more than general software projects (source).
  • Headcount figures are inconsistent, with 200+ video specialists on the homepage, over 1,900 group employees on the about page and a '+1900K' typo in the stats block (source).
  • The site lists no ISO or partner tier certifications. The partners page names only technology vendors (Wowza, Brightcove, Mux, Axinom) (source).
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 30 reviews, $50 to $99 per hour and a $25,000 minimum project. Its founding year of 2010 predates the 2016 KRS entry (source).
  • Formerly Better Software Group, now part of Spyrosoft Group listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (source)
  • Claims 13 years of industry experience and over 200 experts (source)
  • Official Roku development partner (source)

Clients they name: Nordisk Film+, TV 2 Play, Eleven Sports, ITV, CANAL+, Futsal Ekstraklasa

White-label OTT platform OTT managed services Custom video app development (Roku, Smart TV, Vega OS, HbbTV) Connected TV app development POIS ad control for streaming AI solutions for media React Node.js .NET Python
Spyrosoft BSG homepage
Homepage of bsgroup.eu, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Spyrosoft BSG.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2016
HQ (KRS)
Wrocław
Legal form
S.A.
Share capital
10M PLN
Owners
Spyrosoft S.a.
Revenue
38.9M PLN (2025)
Profit
4.1M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Google Business Profile
Spyrosoft BSG · 4.4 (8 reviews) (November 11, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
negative (2/5)

Score: 71/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.3/5 Stability 4.3/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 3.8/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (17) · Checked November 9, 2026

Qulix

Builds custom software, AI MVPs and white-label fintech platforms, and offers team extension, QA, migration and audit services.

68/100

Clutch: 4.9 (10 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD Google: 5.0 (1 review)

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and stability. Weakest axis: hiring (0.0/5).

Pros

  • Net profit of 2,300,000 PLN in 2025 on 17,300,000 PLN revenue. (2026-11-13 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 10 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000958656. (2026-11-13 · source)

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies
Team Extension AI MVP Development Custom Software Development Migration Services QA Automation Load and API Testing UI/UX Design Technical and Business Audit CTO-as-a-Service Public API Implementation
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2022
HQ (KRS)
Wrocław
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
4 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
17.3M PLN (2025)
Profit
2.3M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
250-999
The Org
org chart: 248 positions, 200-500 employees
Google Business Profile
Qulix · 5.0 (1 review) (November 11, 2026)

Score: 68/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.4/5 Stability 4.3/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Clutch KRS LinkedIn

Sources (9) · Checked November 13, 2026

Cowchain

Web3 development team building dApps, smart contracts, DeFi and AI agent platforms for crypto startups.

65/100

Clutch: 5.0 (36 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Crypto startup that needs a DeFi protocol, bridge or dApp built by a Web3 team.

Verdict. Pick Cowchain for a Web3 product built by a crypto-native team, after checking the contracting entity. Skip it outside blockchain.

Pros

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)

Discrepancy: Clutch: 50+ people, but the Polish entity had 109K PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The site gives no address or legal entity, only the name Cowchain Co. in the footer. (source)
  • The home page claims 50+ Web3-native developers. (source)
  • The RetroBridge case claims $200M bridged volume and 1M+ transactions. (source)
  • GoodFirms lists cowchain.io at Chałubińskiego 8 in Warsaw, the KRS address. (source)
  • Cowchain describes building on-chain AI agents with their own wallets that can execute swaps and pay for APIs within spending limits set by the client. (source)

Clients they name: RetroBridge, StepApp, GMX Blueberry Club, agnt.hub, Hybrid

Web3 full-stack development Smart contracts and DeFi Blockchain consulting White-label solutions Web3 UI/UX design Smart contract security audits
Cowchain homepage
Homepage of cowchain.io, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Cowchain.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2023
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
109K PLN (2025)
Profit
83K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
The Org
org chart: 23 positions, 50-200 employees
Google Business Profile
no profile found for the company name (checked November 10, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)
Discrepancy
Clutch: 50+ people, but the Polish entity had 109K PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Score: 65/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.0/5 Stability 3.0/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

byVoice

Kraków company selling an AI voice agent platform for inbound and outbound calls, plus custom agent builds.

65/100

Clutch: 5.0 (13 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Google: 4.0 (8 reviews)

Best for: Small service firms that want an AI phone agent answering calls, set up by the vendor.

Verdict. Pick byVoice for an AI phone agent on top of your existing telephony. Skip it for general product development.

Pros

  • Net profit of 241,100 PLN in 2025 on 5,200,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 13 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000916645. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The site sells AI voice agents that answer and place calls, with plans from $29 a month (source)
  • The site names no client companies, and its testimonials give only personal names and job titles (source)
  • The footer shows ByVoice Sp. z o.o., KRS 0000916645, at ul. Zamknięta 10 in Kraków, matching the registry (source)
  • The about page does not mention C++, embedded work or media clients (source)
AI voice agents Conversational IVR Telephony integration and routing Voice AI consulting API integrations White-label platform AI
byVoice homepage
Homepage of www.byvoice.io, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to byVoice.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Kraków
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
10K PLN
Owners
3 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
5.2M PLN (2025)
Profit
241K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
The Org
org chart: 15 positions
Google Business Profile
byVoice · 4.0 (8 reviews) (November 11, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 65/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.1/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (10) · Checked October 28, 2026

Coditive

Software house building Nuxt and WordPress sites, WooCommerce stores and AI automations and GEO for clients and agencies, including white-label work.

65/100

Clutch: 4.9 (13 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 5,000 USD Premier Verified Google: 4.8 (21 reviews)

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and client reputation. Weakest axis: hiring (0.0/5).

Pros

  • Net profit of 380,800 PLN in 2025 on 1,500,000 PLN revenue. (2026-11-13 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 13 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Certifications listed by the company: Official Nuxt Partner. (2026-11-04 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • Site presents itself as official Nuxt partner (source)
Nuxt and Vue.js Development WordPress Development WooCommerce Stores AI Systems & Automation Technical GEO & LLM Visibility Audits Content Automation White-label Development for Agencies
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Knurów
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
20K PLN
Owners
3 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
1.5M PLN (2025)
Profit
381K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
The Org
org chart: 2 positions, 1-10 employees
Google Business Profile
Coditive · 4.8 (21 reviews) (November 11, 2026)

Score: 65/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.6/5 Stability 3.3/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Clutch KRS LinkedIn

Sources (12) · Checked November 13, 2026

ClearMedia Software House

Polish software house building custom web applications, SaaS platforms and WordPress solutions, providing senior engineers and n8n-based AI automation for agencies and businesses.

64/100

Clutch: 4.9 (9 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Premier Verified Google: 5.0 (17 reviews)

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and client reputation. Weakest axis: hiring (0.0/5).

Pros

  • Net profit of 681,800 PLN in 2025 on 2,100,000 PLN revenue. (2026-11-13 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 9 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000945039. (2026-11-13 · source)

Cons

  • The Clutch snapshot contains 9 reviews; request references for a comparable project. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies
Product Development Senior Engineering Teams Prototype to Production AI and Automation (n8n, APIs) WordPress and WooCommerce Development Long-term Development and Support Dedicated Development Teams
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2022
HQ (KRS)
Biała podlaska
Legal form
sp.k.
Revenue
2.1M PLN (2025)
Profit
682K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
The Org
org chart: 3 positions, 10-50 employees
Google Business Profile
ClearMedia · 5.0 (17 reviews) (November 11, 2026)

Score: 64/100

Transparency 4.0/5 Client reputation 3.8/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Clutch KRS LinkedIn

Sources (7) · Checked November 13, 2026

Netkodo

Builds custom Shopify storefronts, themes and apps, handles Shopify migrations and offers white-label development for agencies, plus web, mobile, DevOps and QA.

60/100

Clutch: 5.0 (7 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Google: 5.0 (1 review)

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and client reputation. Weakest axis: hiring (0.0/5).

Pros

  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 7 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000445020. (2026-11-13 · source)

Cons

  • Net loss of 7,700 PLN in 2025 on 2,700,000 PLN revenue. (2026-11-13 · source)
  • The Clutch snapshot contains 7 reviews; request references for a comparable project. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies
Shopify Store Accelerator Shopify Theme Development Custom Shopify App Development Shopify Migration White-Label Shopify Development for Agencies Shopify POS Custom Web Application Development Web & Mobile Development DevOps & Cloud Digital Product Design
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2012
HQ (KRS)
Toruń
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
50K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
2.7M PLN (2025)
Loss
8K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
The Org
org chart: 3 positions, 10-50 employees
Google Business Profile
Netkodo · 5.0 (1 review) (November 11, 2026)

Score: 60/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.4/5 Stability 2.3/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Clutch KRS LinkedIn

Sources (8) · Checked November 13, 2026

All companies

Show all 13 companies
Size: Rate: · 13
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
Solidstudio white-label development for agencies AWS
Kraków10-494.8 · 1550–99 USD/h18.5M PLN2M PLNwhite-label development for agencies AWS72Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
2
Spyrosoft BSG white-label development for agencies AWS
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 3050–99 USD/h38.9M PLN4.1M PLNwhite-label development for agencies AWS71Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
3
Qulix white-label development for agencies iOS and Swift
Wrocław250-9994.9 · 1050–99 USD/h17.3M PLN2.3M PLNwhite-label development for agencies iOS and Swift68Website Clutch KRS
4
Cowchain white-label development for agencies React
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3625–49 USD/h109K PLN83K PLNwhite-label development for agencies React65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
5
byVoice white-label development for agencies PHP and Laravel
Kraków10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/h5.2M PLN241K PLNwhite-label development for agencies PHP and Laravel65Website Clutch KRS
6
Coditive white-label development for agencies Vue.js
Knurów10-494.9 · 1350–99 USD/h1.5M PLN381K PLNwhite-label development for agencies Vue.js65Website Clutch KRS
7
ClearMedia Software House white-label development for agencies Vue.js
Biała podlaska10-494.9 · 925–49 USD/h2.1M PLN682K PLNwhite-label development for agencies Vue.js64Website Clutch KRS
8
Netkodo white-label development for agencies Shopify
Toruń10-495.0 · 750–99 USD/h2.7M PLN-8K PLNwhite-label development for agencies Shopify60Website Clutch KRS
–
BidsCube based in Wrocław; local office unconfirmed
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 7n/a9.9M PLN-54K PLNwhite-label development for agencies58Website Clutch KRS
–
Brand New Story too little client evidence
n/an/ano Clutch profilen/a1.1M PLN19K PLNwhite-label development for agencies51Website Portfolio KRS
–
Itexus too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4125–49 USD/hn/an/awhite-label development for agencies iOS and Swift46Website Clutch
–
Synebo too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/awhite-label development for agencies44Website Clutch
–
LAB325 too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 825–49 USD/hn/an/awhite-label development for agencies Node.js43Website Clutch

Who is not in the top 8, and why

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders 1

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • Brand New Story

Weak evidence for white-label development for agencies 3

They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.

  • Itexus
  • Synebo
  • LAB325

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h 4
50-99 USD/h 7
100-149 USD/h 0
150-199 USD/h 0
Rates declared on Clutch, 11 companies with an office in Poland.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Ask whether their people may talk to your client, who owns the code and what the NDA says about poaching. White-label only works when the partner stays invisible and the repository is yours.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of November 13, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best white-label development companies for agencies in Poland in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Solidstudio (72), 2. Spyrosoft BSG (71), 3. Qulix (68), 4. Cowchain (65), 5. byVoice (65). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company in the data set.

How much do white-label development for agencies agencies in Poland charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does white-label development for agencies?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or the Wrocław company catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,424 companies in the data set
  • 1,101 with KRS records
  • 1,003 with a financial statement
  • 7,436 Clutch listing records
  • 849 employee review profiles on GoWork

Sources: Clutch profiles and listings, KRS records, available financial statements from rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository, GoWork reviews, JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs listings, and the Wrocław company catalog. Coverage varies by company; dates and links accompany the available records. The 0 to 100 score combines six axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity and hiring in the last 90 days. Paid Clutch placements do not increase the score.

Disclosures

  • Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, source links and dates accompany the available company records.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Best software development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked by registers, filings and reviews, out of 1400 checked across Poland. Best React development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 452 with React evidence in Poland. Best TypeScript development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 222 with TypeScript evidence in Poland. Best Next.js development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 113 with Next.js evidence in Poland. Best Node.js development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 349 with Node.js evidence in Poland. Best AI agent development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 360 with AI agents evidence in Poland. Best MCP server and AI integration companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 65 with MCP servers and AI integrations evidence in Poland. Best LLM and generative AI development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 521 with LLM and generative AI evidence in Poland. Best forward deployed AI engineering companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 34 with forward deployed AI engineering evidence in Poland. Best chatbot and conversational AI development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 464 with chatbots and conversational AI evidence in Poland. Best business process automation companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 316 with business process automation evidence in Poland. Best AI consulting and implementation companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 345 with AI strategy and implementation evidence in Poland.
Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center