ciunkos.com Rankings

Fintech in Warsaw, ranked for 2027

Best fintech software houses in Warsaw

  1. 1 LeanCode Banks and large brands that have chosen Flutter and want the team behind Patrol, an open source Flutter testin 89
  2. 2 ISOLUTION Bank, insurer or public body that needs Java development plus GDPR, whistleblowing and security work. 87
  3. 3 Sunscrapers VC firms and data-heavy SaaS companies that need Python, Django and data pipeline work. 86

I checked 106 companies with an office in Warsaw that show fintech work in at least one source (106 by their Clutch profile) against the court register, their latest filing and their employee reviews. 51 meet the ranking criteria, and the 10 highest scores are below. I sell the alternative: one senior engineer working with AI agents.

In short: The highest-scoring fintech software houses in Warsaw for 2027 are LeanCode (score 89), ISOLUTION (score 87) and Sunscrapers (score 86). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.

Get matched offers in 24 hours See the top 10 Download the data (CSV)

  • 106 companies checked
  • 57 verified in KRS
  • 55 with a financial statement
  • 56 with an employee review profile
  • 1 excluded: paid positions or no office

Which company fits your project

  • LeanCode Banks and large brands that have chosen Flutter and want the team behind Patrol, an open source Flutter testing tool. Fintech is 60% of client industries on its Clutch profile. Score 89, 5.0 on Clutch from 40 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • ISOLUTION Bank, insurer or public body that needs Java development plus GDPR, whistleblowing and security work. Fintech is 55% of client industries on its Clutch profile. Score 87, 5.0 on Clutch from 7 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • Sunscrapers VC firms and data-heavy SaaS companies that need Python, Django and data pipeline work. Fintech is 50% of client industries on its Clutch profile. Score 86, 4.9 on Clutch from 32 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • Innowise Teams that must add several developers quickly and can manage an outsourced team under their own tech lead. Fintech is 30% of client industries on its Clutch profile. Score 82, 4.9 on Clutch from 73 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • One senior instead of a team If the project fits one person with coding agents, compare the cost before you pay an agency margin.

The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows fintech work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.

The top 10 at a glance

Click a column to sort.

#CompanyPeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
LeanCode profit 1.5M PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 4050–99 USD/hfintech 60% Azure89
2
ISOLUTION profit 619K PLN (2025) GoWork 16/5
50-2495.0 · 750–99 USD/hfintech 55% Java87
3
Sunscrapers profit 485K PLN (2025) GoWork 6/11
10-494.9 · 3250–99 USD/hfintech 50% Python86
4
Innowise profit 3M PLN (2025) GoWork 65/10
1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/hfintech 30% AWS82
5
BlueSoft profit 43.8M PLN (2025) GoWork 13/39
1000-99994.8 · 1350–99 USD/hfintech 30% Java82
6
NerdySoft profit 552K PLN (2025) foreign-owned
50-2495.0 · 950–99 USD/hfintech 70% iOS and Swift82
7
Cowchain profit 83K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 3625–49 USD/hfintech 60% React81
8
FREYSOFT profit 158K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 850–99 USD/hfintech 65% .NET81
9
itCraft profit 1.1M PLN (2025) GoWork 24/8
50-2495.0 · 7150–99 USD/hfintech 30% Flutter80
10
Relevant Software profit 608K PLN (2025)
50-2494.9 · 3250–99 USD/hfintech 35% iOS and Swift80

The ranking

The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how deep the company goes into fintech (its share of the Clutch profile and of open roles) and weighs 35% instead of 15%, so specialists rank above large generalists. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.

Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.

LeanCode

Warsaw Flutter specialist that builds mobile apps for banks and large brands and created the Patrol testing framework.

Clutch: 5.0 (40 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Banks and large brands that have chosen Flutter and want the team behind Patrol, an open source Flutter testing tool.

Verdict. Pick LeanCode when your app is in Flutter and you need enterprise process. Without a Flutter commitment, a broader product team fits better.

Pros

  • Profitable in the filings we checked, with a 2025 profit of 1.5M PLN on 22.1M PLN of revenue.
  • Its open source Flutter testing framework, Patrol, is public work anyone can inspect. Two Google Developer Experts work on the team.
  • The site names Credit Agricole Bank Polska as a banking reference, plus Wedel and Maspex.
  • Holds 40 Clutch reviews with a 5.0 average, including reviewers from Google and Credit Agricole.

Cons

  • Clutch puts 80% of its work in mobile, so the team specializes in Flutter apps.
  • The 25,000 USD Clutch minimum and the enterprise focus rule out very small budgets.
  • The last JustJoin snapshot showed zero open roles, and 28 GoWork entries are too few to judge it as an employer.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page claims 80+ experts, 40+ dedicated Flutter developers and 100+ delivered products (source).
  • The about page gives 2016 as the founding year and lists Patrol, its open source Flutter testing framework launched in 2022 (source).
  • Google lists LeanCode as an official Flutter consultant, and two of its engineers are Google Developer Experts (source).
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 40 reviews and 80% mobile work, with reviewers from Google, Credit Agricole and Maspex (source).

Clients they name: Credit Agricole Bank Polska, Wedel, Maspex, Shell, Virgin Money, Millennium

Flutter mobile app development Web and custom software (.NET, React) Scoping and design thinking workshops Mobile app audits Automated UI testing with Patrol Flutter training
LeanCode homepage
Homepage of leancode.co, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to LeanCode.

ISOLUTION

Warsaw Java software house running custom projects, team leasing and its own compliance and cloud products.

Clutch: 5.0 (7 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Bank, insurer or public body that needs Java development plus GDPR, whistleblowing and security work.

Verdict. Pick ISOLUTION for a Java system in banking or insurance that needs GDPR and whistleblower compliance. Ask for named references first.

Pros

  • Sells its own compliance products, Esignaller for whistleblowing and Wizards for test data anonymization.
  • Offers security audits and penetration tests next to Java development.
  • Revenue reached 27M PLN in 2025.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 7 reviews.

Cons

  • Lists team leasing among its IT services, so part of the business is body leasing.
  • The site names no clients and shows no energy-sector work.
  • Thin margin in 2025, with 619K PLN of profit on 27M PLN of revenue.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page claims over 100 employees, over 150 projects and over 100 clients (source).
  • The solutions page lists Esignaller for the EU whistleblower directive and Wizards for anonymizing test data (source).
  • Cloud services include security audits and penetration tests, with team leasing listed under IT services (source).
  • The site names no clients, and its case studies describe a bank and a top-three Polish insurer without names (source).
Custom software development (Java) Team leasing Cloud advisory, security audits and penetration tests Esignaller whistleblower platform Wizards personal data anonymization IT training and Enterprise Architect
ISOLUTION homepage
Homepage of isolution.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to ISOLUTION.

Sunscrapers

Warsaw Python and data engineering house building software for venture capital firms, health tech and SaaS companies.

Clutch: 4.9 (32 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: VC firms and data-heavy SaaS companies that need Python, Django and data pipeline work.

Verdict. Choose Sunscrapers for Python data platforms, deal sourcing tools or ETL work. For a mobile-first consumer app, pick a team with mobile case studies.

Pros

  • Revenue was 17.7M PLN in 2025, with a profit of 485K PLN.
  • The site claims 200+ projects and 50+ clients since 2010.
  • Case studies name 15Five, Codility and COTA.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 32 reviews.

Cons

  • GoWork has 11 negative and 6 positive entries, with 2 mentions of layoffs.
  • The minimum project on Clutch is 25,000 USD.
  • It also sells dedicated teams, so agree on who owns delivery.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The footer names Sunscrapers sp. z o.o. at Tadeusza Czackiego 15/17 in Warsaw. (source)
  • The about page says the company was founded in 2010 and lists 40+ team members, 50+ clients and 200+ projects. (source)
  • The about page claims scaleup clients raised 280M USD. (source)
  • Featured case studies include 15Five, COTA and Codility. (source)

Clients they name: 15Five, Codility, COTA, TrustedHousesitters, Weekly, Biorelevant

Python development Full-stack web development Data engineering Machine learning and AI DevOps MVP development
Sunscrapers homepage
Homepage of sunscrapers.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Sunscrapers.

Innowise

Very large outsourcing and staff augmentation company with a Warsaw headquarters claim and a catalog covering almost every technology.

Clutch: 4.9 (73 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Teams that must add several developers quickly and can manage an outsourced team under their own tech lead.

Verdict. Use Innowise for staff augmentation under your own tech lead when you need CVs fast across many technologies. Skip it when you need a partner whose past work you can verify.

Pros

  • The Polish company reported 251.2M PLN of revenue and a profit of 3.0M PLN in its 2025 filing.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 73 reviews.
  • GoWork employee reviews lean positive, with 65 positive and 10 negative.
  • The site lists ISO 9001, ISO 27001 and ISO 13485.

Cons

  • The margin is thin, with profit at about one percent of revenue.
  • The case studies page names no clients and warns that details may be generalized or modified. The portfolio cannot be checked.
  • The Polish company dates from 2021, while the site claims 2007. The footer gives a registered address in Boston, and the job boards showed no open roles at the last snapshot.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page claims 3,500+ people, 1,600 projects and a founding year of 2007. The Polish company in KRS dates from 2021 (source).
  • The FAQ names Warsaw as headquarters, while the footer gives a registered address in Boston, MA (source).
  • The case studies page names no clients and warns that client details may be generalized or modified (source).
  • Innowise sells staff augmentation openly, promising CVs in 1 to 2 days and a team joining in 3 to 5 days (source).

Clients they name: Hays, Spar, Tietoevry, Topcon, NTT Data, Commercial Bank of Qatar

Custom software development Staff augmentation and dedicated teams Testing and QA Data, AI and ML ERP and CRM Legacy modernization AI
Innowise homepage
Homepage of innowise.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Innowise.

BlueSoft

Warsaw enterprise integrator owned by Orange Polska, focused on data, integration, cloud and AI for banks, telecom and retail.

Clutch: 4.8 (13 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD

Best for: Banks, telecoms and large retailers that need integration, data platforms or managed services from a vendor with a corporate owner.

Verdict. Pick BlueSoft for corporate integration, data and managed services backed by a telecom group. For a startup or a single small product, it is too heavy.

Pros

  • BlueSoft reported 300.9M PLN of revenue and a profit of 43.8M PLN in 2025.
  • Orange Polska has owned BlueSoft since 2019, which helps with procurement and continuity.
  • Named case studies cover Canal+, Biedronka, GATX and Hellenic Cables. Clutch shows 4.8 from 13 reviews.
  • One of the biggest recruiters on the job boards in this set.

Cons

  • GoWork employee reviews are negative (13 positive, 39 negative), with 2 mentions of layoffs.
  • The minimum project is 50,000 USD and the processes are enterprise-grade, so an MVP is a poor fit.
  • Many case studies are for Orange companies, the owner, so outside references are fewer than they look.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • BlueSoft has belonged to the Orange Polska group since 2019, together with Craftware and Essembli (source).
  • Several case studies are for Orange companies, the owner, next to clients such as Canal+, Biedronka and GATX (source).
  • The site claims 1000+ experts and 200+ active clients and says it is hiring 118 people (source).
  • The site shows partner logos for AWS, Microsoft, Google, MuleSoft, Salesforce and Databricks (source).

Clients they name: Orange Polska, Canal+, Biedronka, GATX, Hellenic Cables, Raiffeisen Bank

Custom software development Data platforms and BI System integration (MuleSoft) Cloud migration AI agents and document processing Managed services Java Python PostgreSQL Terraform
BlueSoft homepage
Homepage of bluesoft.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to BlueSoft.

NerdySoft

Dedicated team provider for fintech and credit-tech, with HQ in Warsaw and tech offices in Malta and Ukraine.

Clutch: 5.0 (9 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 100,000 USD

Best for: Fintech or lending company that wants a dedicated team for card, loan or payment software.

Verdict. Pick NerdySoft for a long fintech engagement with a dedicated team. Skip it for embedded work or a small budget.

Pros

  • Focuses on fintech and lending, with card, loan and payment processing cases.
  • Profitable in 2025, with 552K PLN of profit on 6.4M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 9 reviews.

Cons

  • Mainly a dedicated-team provider, so expect a staffing-style contract.
  • Clutch sets a $100,000 minimum project.
  • The site shows no C++ or embedded work.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page names Warsaw as HQ, with tech offices in Malta and Ukraine. (source)
  • The home page lists only a Malta address and the entity NERDYSOFT HOLDINGS LTD. (source)
  • Case studies cover virtual banking for a UK card issuer and a payment processing center for neobanks. (source)
  • The home page still carries Lorem ipsum placeholder text. (source)

Clients they name: BOX Processing, CG24 Group, TourEase, Costner ehf

Software product engineering Dedicated engineering teams Mobile app engineering Technology consulting Software testing and QA DevOps and UI/UX design
NerdySoft homepage
Homepage of nerdysoft.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to NerdySoft.

Cowchain

Web3 development team building dApps, smart contracts, DeFi and AI agent platforms for crypto startups.

Clutch: 5.0 (36 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Crypto startup that needs a DeFi protocol, bridge or dApp built by a Web3 team.

Verdict. Pick Cowchain for a Web3 product built by a crypto-native team, after checking the contracting entity. Skip it outside blockchain.

Pros

  • Works only in Web3, with dApps, DeFi and smart contracts as core work.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 36 reviews.
  • Shows shipped products such as RetroBridge, with $200M bridged volume.
  • Clutch lists rates of $25 to $49 an hour.

Cons

  • The Polish company reported only 109K PLN of revenue in 2025 while the site claims 50+ developers.
  • The site lists no address or legal entity, so check who signs the contract.
  • The site shows little Rust or embedded C++ work.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The site gives no address or legal entity, only the name Cowchain Co. in the footer. (source)
  • The home page claims 50+ Web3-native developers. (source)
  • The RetroBridge case claims $200M bridged volume and 1M+ transactions. (source)
  • GoodFirms lists cowchain.io at Chałubińskiego 8 in Warsaw, the KRS address. (source)

Clients they name: RetroBridge, StepApp, GMX Blueberry Club, agnt.hub, Hybrid

Web3 full-stack development Smart contracts and DeFi Blockchain consulting White-label solutions Web3 UI/UX design Smart contract security audits
Cowchain homepage
Homepage of cowchain.io, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Cowchain.

FREYSOFT

Fixed-price engineering for fintech integrations, payment rails, data platforms and AI automation.

Clutch: 5.0 (8 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Fintech teams with a fixed integration or migration deadline and a budget from 35,000 USD.

Verdict. Pick FreySoft for a fixed-price payment or data integration with a firm date. For a small budget or open-ended product work, look elsewhere.

Pros

  • Prices are on the site, with fixed-scope packages from 35,000 USD.
  • Revenue reached 4.3M PLN in 2025, with a profit of 158K PLN.
  • The WorldRemit case covers 70 payment corridors in 12 countries.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 8 reviews.

Cons

  • The site lists no Polish address, KRS or NIP.
  • Clutch shows 8 reviews, a small sample for a 50-249 headcount.
  • Engineers work from Poland and Ukraine, and client leadership sits in the US and Portugal.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The site publishes fixed-price packages from $35,000 for 4-6 weeks and from $65,000 for 8-12 weeks. (source)
  • The footer says FreySoft was founded in 2019 by Oleg Panchenko and runs entities in the US, Portugal, Poland and Ukraine. (source)
  • The site shows no Polish address, KRS or NIP, so the link to the Warsaw company rests on the name and the Clutch profile. (source)
  • A case study describes banking partner integrations for WorldRemit across 70 payment corridors in 12 countries. (source)

Clients they name: WorldRemit, Volkswagen Group Services

API and platform integration Data engineering AI and automation Fintech and payments engineering Legacy rescue and migration AI
FREYSOFT homepage
Homepage of freysoft.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to FREYSOFT.

itCraft

Warsaw software house that builds mobile, web and back-end apps and grew up on healthcare projects.

Clutch: 5.0 (71 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Healthcare and retail companies that need a mobile app built and maintained by an ISO-certified team with named references.

Verdict. Take itCraft for a regulated healthcare app that needs ISO 13485 and named references. Skip it for a small MVP below its 25,000 USD minimum.

Pros

  • Profitable in the filings we checked, with a 2025 profit of 1.1M PLN on 19.5M PLN of revenue.
  • Holds 71 Clutch reviews with a 5.0 average and Premier Verified status, one of the longest review records in this group.
  • The home page shows ISO 9001, ISO 27001 and ISO 13485, and ISO 13485 covers medical device software.
  • Its own site names large clients such as Grupa Luxmed, Rossmann and Inter Cars.

Cons

  • Employee reviews on GoWork mention layoffs 7 times, and the last snapshot showed zero open roles.
  • Clutch gives 2010 as the founding year, the site claims 12 years on the market, and KRS registered the current company in 2020.
  • The 25,000 USD Clutch minimum rules out small first projects.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page claims 100+ experts, 350+ delivered projects and 12 years on the market (source).
  • The home page shows ISO 9001, ISO 13485 and ISO 27001 logos, and the medical device standard matches its healthcare focus (source).
  • Clutch gives 2010 as the founding year and seven locations, while KRS registered the current company in 2020 and the site lists Warsaw only (source).
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 71 reviews, 50 to 99 USD per hour and a 25,000 USD minimum (source).

Clients they name: Grupa Luxmed, Rossmann, Inter Cars, Sodexo, Roche, DHL

Product discovery UX/UI design Mobile development (iOS, Android, Flutter) Web and back-end development Support and maintenance team Managed teams and staff augmentation
itCraft homepage
Homepage of itcraftapps.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to itCraft.

Relevant Software

Software development and consulting firm from Lviv with a Warsaw office, building custom platforms, IoT and AI products.

Clutch: 4.9 (32 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD

Best for: Healthcare or energy company that needs an IoT or AI product built by a dedicated team over several months.

Verdict. Pick Relevant for an IoT or healthcare product with a multi-month budget. Skip it for a short fixed-price job.

Pros

  • Names Volkswagen, Össur, Norwegian and AstraZeneca in its case studies.
  • Covers IoT, AI and HIPAA compliance work in one firm.
  • Profitable in 2025, with 608K PLN of profit on 14.3M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 32 reviews.

Cons

  • Clutch puts staff augmentation at 10% of its work, and dedicated teams are a core offer.
  • Engagements start at three months on time and materials.
  • The pages I checked show no Rust or Go case study.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page lists the Warsaw office at Jana Dantyszka 18, the same address as in KRS. (source)
  • The home page claims 100+ in-house experts and 246 delivered projects. (source)
  • The home page sets a minimum commitment of 3 months on time-and-materials terms. (source)
  • The footer copyright names Relevant Software LLC. (source)

Clients they name: Volkswagen, Össur, Norwegian, AstraZeneca, FirstHomeCoach

Full-cycle software development Dedicated development teams AI and machine learning IoT development and consulting Data and BI Security and compliance (HIPAA, penetration testing) AI
Relevant Software homepage
Homepage of relevant.software, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Relevant Software.

Every company we checked

The table below has the 106 companies with fintech evidence in Warsaw, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.

Show all 106 companies
Size: Rate: · 106
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
LeanCode fintech 60% Azure
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 4050–99 USD/h22.1M PLN1.5M PLNfintech 60% Azure89Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
2
ISOLUTION fintech 55% Java
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 750–99 USD/h27M PLN619K PLNfintech 55% Java87Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
3
Sunscrapers fintech 50% Python
Warsaw10-494.9 · 3250–99 USD/h17.7M PLN485K PLNfintech 50% Python86Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
4
Innowise fintech 30% AWS
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/h251.2M PLN3M PLNfintech 30% AWS82Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
5
BlueSoft fintech 30% Java
Warsaw1000-99994.8 · 1350–99 USD/h300.9M PLN43.8M PLNfintech 30% Java82Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
6
NerdySoft fintech 70% iOS and Swift
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 950–99 USD/h6.4M PLN552K PLNfintech 70% iOS and Swift82Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
7
Cowchain fintech 60% React
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3625–49 USD/h109K PLN83K PLNfintech 60% React81Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
8
FREYSOFT fintech 65% .NET
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 850–99 USD/h4.3M PLN158K PLNfintech 65% .NET81Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
9
itCraft fintech 30% Flutter
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 7150–99 USD/h19.5M PLN1.1M PLNfintech 30% Flutter80Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
10
Relevant Software fintech 35% iOS and Swift
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 3250–99 USD/h14.3M PLN608K PLNfintech 35% iOS and Swift80Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Solvd too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9995.0 · 24100–149 USD/h19.4M PLN1.6M PLNfintech 30% AWS78Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Clurgo too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.3 · 1125–49 USD/h27.5M PLN205K PLNfintech 30% Java77Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Geniusee too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9995.0 · 7125–49 USD/h253K PLNn/afintech 40% AWS77Website Clutch KRS
–
GLOBALDEV too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 11625–49 USD/h2.4M PLN31K PLNfintech 25% iOS and Swift77Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Order Group too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1950–99 USD/h8.2M PLN72K PLNfintech 30% AWS77Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
YND too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 11100–149 USD/h17.3M PLN-219K PLNfintech 40% Ruby on Rails77Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Andersen too little client evidence
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 12950–99 USD/h177.1M PLN363K PLNfintech 20% Salesforce76Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
WEBSENSA too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 1350–99 USD/h9.3M PLN5K PLNfintech 30% Python75Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Mobile Reality too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1950–99 USD/h2.6M PLN-65K PLNfintech 35% AWS74Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
NG Logic website not confirmed
Warsaw50-2494.7 · 825–49 USD/h16.4M PLN1.5M PLNfintech 30% AWS74Website Clutch KRS
–
N7 Mobile too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1025–49 USD/h13.7M PLN576K PLNfintech 20% Python73Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Elinext too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 4625–49 USD/h18.6M PLN754K PLNfintech 25% iOS and Swift72Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
ITSG Global too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 6n/a17.5M PLN799K PLNfintech 30%72Website Clutch KRS
–
Darly Solutions too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3450–99 USD/h5.4M PLN321K PLNfintech 25% AWS71Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
SENLA too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 1925–49 USD/h25.8M PLN1.7M PLNfintech 25% AWS71Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
deepsense.ai too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 10100–149 USD/h89.7M PLN38.9M PLNfintech 25%70Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
EffectiveSoft body leasing
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 1950–99 USD/h9.4M PLN140K PLNfintech 32% Java70Website Clutch KRS
–
havenocode too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 2450–99 USD/h2.9M PLN155K PLNfintech 25%70Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Itransition too little client evidence
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 4225–49 USD/h83.4M PLN3.6M PLNfintech 15% .NET70Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Fively too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3050–99 USD/h12.5M PLN93K PLNfintech 20% AWS69Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Blazity too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 2750–99 USD/h15.1M PLN1.4M PLNfintech 15% Next.js67Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
MITRIX Technology too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 1650–99 USD/h17.3M PLN746K PLNfintech 20% Azure67Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Acaisoft too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9995.0 · 650–99 USD/h34.1M PLN4M PLNfintech 20% Azure66Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Azati Software too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 1525–49 USD/h15.1M PLN713K PLNfintech 20% Shopify66Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Decerto too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 1350–99 USD/h76.8M PLN10.5M PLNfintech 15% Java66Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Devapo too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 950–99 USD/h12.7M PLN182K PLNfintech 15% Java66Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Modsen too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 725–49 USD/h12.2M PLN890K PLNfintech 20% AWS66Website Clutch KRS
–
Vilmate too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/h10.8M PLN43K PLNfintech 20% Azure66Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
CleverDev Software too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 650–99 USD/h1.2M PLN94K PLNfintech 25% AWS65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Evojam too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 1250–99 USD/h5.3M PLN95K PLNfintech 15% AWS64Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
iLabs too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1425–49 USD/h2.1M PLN-60K PLNfintech 25% Magento (Adobe Commerce)64Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Oxagile too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 17n/a2.1M PLN135K PLNfintech 20% AWS64Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
ImpiCode too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h4.3M PLN318K PLNfintech 20% AWS63Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Mainsoft too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 1750–99 USD/h3.8M PLN-150K PLNfintech 25% AWS63Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Neontri too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 350–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 70% iOS and Swift63Website Clutch
–
The Codest too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 2750–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 50% Java63Website Clutch
–
10Clouds Financial Institutions too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 9550–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 75% AWS62Website Clutch
–
Finture too little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 350–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 65% Java62Website Clutch
–
Syntech Software too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 1125–49 USD/h1.2M PLN36K PLNfintech 20% React61Website Clutch KRS
–
Codino too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 650–99 USD/h2.8M PLN182K PLNfintech 15%60Website Clutch KRS
–
Freeport Metrics too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.8 · 1550–99 USD/h5.3M PLN126K PLNfintech 15% Java60Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Ftech-it too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1725–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 40% .NET60Website Clutch
–
Itexus too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4125–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 60% iOS and Swift60Website Clutch
–
Quantum too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1550–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 40% Python60Website Clutch
–
RNDpoint too little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 80% Angular60Website Clutch
–
Aligned Code too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 45% AWS59Website Clutch
–
KnubiSoft too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 3625–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 40% Java59Website Clutch
–
LINKERSOFT GROUP too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 825–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 40% .NET59Website Clutch
–
Stepwise too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 2950–99 USD/h800K PLN-355K PLNfintech 20% Google Cloud59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Sunmait Technologies too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 950–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 50% React59Website Clutch
–
Symfa too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1850–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 50% .NET59Website Clutch
–
DDI Development too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 725–49 USD/h3.6M PLN123K PLNfintech 15% AWS58Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
MintyMint too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 325–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 40% AWS57Website Clutch
–
RevoTech PRO body leasing
Warsaw10-495.0 · 725–49 USD/h276K PLN42K PLNfintech 20% AWS57Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Smartym Pro too little client evidence
n/a10-494.7 · 1525–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 60% Java57Website Clutch
–
Code & Pepper too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.6 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 60% AWS56Website Clutch
–
Dynevo Group too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 825–49 USD/h4.1M PLN-177K PLNfintech 20% AWS56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
DevTalents body leasing
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 3150–99 USD/hn/a-218K PLNfintech 30% Ruby on Rails55Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
SoftwiseAI too little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 250–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 50%55Website Clutch
–
TUATARA too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 250–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 40%55Website Clutch
–
Computools too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 10625–49 USD/h1.6M PLN-387K PLNfintech 15% Android54Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
8allocate too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.7 · 2550–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 35% Python53Website Clutch
–
Appotype too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.8 · 625–49 USD/h1.9M PLN-314K PLNfintech 20% Python52Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Fireart Studio too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4050–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 30% AWS52Website Clutch
–
PixelPlex too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3350–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 30% Flutter52Website Clutch
–
SoftwareMill too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3050–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 30% Java52Website Clutch
–
Empat too little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 15125–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 25% AWS51Website Clutch
–
CROSS too little client evidence
Opole50-2495.0 · 250–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 30% Angular50Website Clutch
–
Yellow too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 6050–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 25% Python50Website Clutch
–
ApexTech too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 950–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 30% Ruby on Rails49Website Clutch
–
Softellar too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h44K PLN-110K PLNfintech 15% Node.js49Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Celadonsoft too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 25% AWS48Website Clutch
–
Pynest too little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 25% Python48Website Clutch
–
Dashbouquet Development too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3450–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 25% Node.js47Website Clutch
–
e-point SA too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1950–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 20% Magento (Adobe Commerce)47Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Lightpoint Global too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1325–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 25% .NET47Website Clutch
–
Algomine too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1250–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 25%46Website Clutch
–
Infograins Software Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 8950–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 20% iOS and Swift45Website Clutch
–
SLON Media too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 6125–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 20%45Website Clutch
–
CleverLabs too little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 25% AWS44Website Clutch
–
Cyboticx too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 46100–149 USD/hn/an/afintech 20% React Native44Website Clutch
–
Fabrity too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.7 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 20% Azure44Website Clutch
–
Pretius too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 850–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 20% TypeScript44Website Clutch KRS
–
300.codes too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 20% AWS43Website Clutch
–
GetInData now Xebia too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 13n/an/an/afintech 20% Google Cloud42Website Clutch
–
Startup House too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 15% Ruby on Rails42Website Portfolio Clutch
–
ein-des-ein too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3250–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 15% AWS40Website Clutch
–
AA too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 450–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 20% Azure39Website Clutch
–
ACW Soft Solutions too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 15% TypeScript39Website Clutch
–
KITRUM struck off KRS
Warsaw250-9995.0 · 7350–99 USD/h0 PLN-28K PLNfintech 20% React39Website Clutch KRS
–
Helpware Tech too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 3050–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 15% AWS38Website Clutch
–
HQSoftware too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2425–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 15% Unity and game development38Website Portfolio Clutch
–
MVP Development Company too little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 2350–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 15% TypeScript37Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Powercode Group too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 3225–49 USD/hn/an/afintech 15% AWS37Website Clutch
–
Zoolatech too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 1850–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 15% AWS37Website Clutch
–
Processifier too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/afintech 15% Azure33Website Clutch

All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.

Who is not in the top 10, and why

Paid placements and “serves the city” without an office

On the Clutch city list the first positions are bought with ads (links through ppc.clutch.co) or a “serves” entry. These companies have no office in the city according to KRS or their own site, so they are not ranked here.

  • Geniusee (paid)

Struck off the register or in liquidation

They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.

  • KITRUM

Body leasing, product companies and other services

Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.

  • EffectiveSoft
  • RevoTech PRO
  • DevTalents

Website not confirmed

The website could not be tied to the registered company. Without that I cannot tell whose filing and reviews I am reading, so the company is not ranked.

  • NG Logic

Ranked 11th and below

They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.

  • Solvd
  • Clurgo
  • GLOBALDEV
  • Order Group
  • YND
  • Andersen
  • WEBSENSA
  • Mobile Reality
  • N7 Mobile
  • Elinext
  • ITSG Global
  • Darly Solutions
  • + 29 more in the full table

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • Neontri
  • Finture
  • MintyMint
  • SoftwiseAI
  • TUATARA
  • CROSS · Opole
  • AA
  • Processifier

Weak evidence for fintech

They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.

  • The Codest
  • 10Clouds Financial Institutions
  • Ftech-it
  • Itexus
  • Quantum
  • RNDpoint
  • Aligned Code
  • KnubiSoft
  • LINKERSOFT GROUP
  • Sunmait Technologies
  • Symfa
  • Smartym Pro
  • + 29 more in the full table

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h 32
50-99 USD/h 67
100-149 USD/h 4
150-199 USD/h 0
Rates declared on Clutch, 103 companies with an office in the city.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Ask about PSD2, DORA and audits they passed with a client, and who signs the outsourcing agreement your regulator needs. Fintech experience on a profile often means one payments integration.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 30, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best fintech software houses in Warsaw in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. LeanCode (89), 2. ISOLUTION (87), 3. Sunscrapers (86), 4. Innowise (82), 5. BlueSoft (82). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.

How much do fintech agencies in Warsaw charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does fintech?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,487 companies in the data set
  • 722 checked in the National Court Register
  • 453 with a financial statement
  • 7,436 Clutch listing positions read, paid ones marked
  • 690 employee review profiles on GoWork
  • 2+ months of data collection, since September 2026

The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.

Disclosures

  • Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center