I checked 31 companies with an office in Poland that show AR/VR work in at least one source (29 by their Clutch profile, 2 by my Wrocław catalog) against the court register, their latest filing and their employee reviews. 7 meet the ranking criteria, and the 6 highest scores are below. The top sits in Wrocław (4), Rzeszów (1), Gdańsk (1). I sell the alternative: one senior engineer working with AI agents.
In short: The highest-scoring AR/VR development companies in Poland for 2027 are xBerry (score 65), NeuroSYS (score 61) and Fream (score 57). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.
xBerryManufacturers and logistics companies that need computer vision, embedded AI or robotics software, from an MVP to a production system. AR/VR is 15% of service lines on its Clutch profile. Score 65, 5.0 on Clutch from 11 reviews, profit in 2025.
NeuroSYSAutomotive, logistics and pharma firms that need computer vision, AR in Unity, or a Node.js or PHP system around them. AR/VR is 15% of service lines on its Clutch profile. Score 61, 4.5 on Clutch from 9 reviews, profit in 2025.
FreamProperty developer or real estate firm that wants a VR walkthrough, a property app or an industrial IoT tool. AR/VR is 15% of service lines on its Clutch profile. Score 57, 5.0 on Clutch from 7 reviews, profit in 2025.
Right InformationIndustrial or pharma company that needs PLC, IoT and data work tied into one system. AR/VR is 10% of service lines on its Clutch profile. Score 54, 5.0 on Clutch from 9 reviews, profit in 2025.
One senior instead of a teamIf the project fits one person with coding agents, compare the cost before you pay an agency margin.
The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows AR/VR work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.
The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how deep the company goes into AR/VR (its share of the Clutch profile and of open roles) and weighs 35% instead of 15%, so specialists rank above large generalists. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.
Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.
1
xBerry
Remote R&D team building physical AI, including computer vision, embedded systems and robotics software, for manufacturers and logistics.
Best for: Manufacturers and logistics companies that need computer vision, embedded AI or robotics software, from an MVP to a production system.
Verdict. A specialist, and the numbers back it up. If your product has a camera, a sensor or a robot in it, start here; if it is a web app, look elsewhere on this list.
Pros
The only hardware-adjacent house in the top 10: vision inspection, robotics, edge AI, backed by an EU regional development grant.
Profit of 3.5M PLN on 13.3M PLN of revenue in 2025, two private individuals as owners, still hiring on the job boards.
A 5.0 rating on Clutch from 11 reviews and a rare price signal on the site: a simple MVP starts from tens of thousands of euros.
Employee reviews are positive (6 positive, 3 negative).
Cons
Five GoWork reviews mention layoffs or cuts despite the positive overall tone.
Most case studies hide the client; only a few are named.
Founding year differs between the site, Clutch and the court register (2019 in KRS).
From their website and Clutch profile
xBerry is the only hardware-adjacent firm in the set, working on robotics, embedded AI and vision inspection. The site shows an EU regional development grant badge (source).
The FAQ gives a price signal, saying a simple MVP starts from tens of thousands of euros (source).
The founding year conflicts, with 2016 on the site, 2015 on Clutch and 2019 in the KRS entry in our file (source).
Most case studies hide the client (our Swedish partner, a leading vaccine manufacturer). Only Coco and Szajna are named, and CSHARK appears as a testimonial giver (source).
AI and machine learning consultingLLM automationCustom web and mobile development (.NET, React, Node.js, Unity)Digital transformation, AR and IoTProduct and UX/UI designR&D and data sciencePythonAIMachine learningComputer vision
Homepage of neurosys.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to NeuroSYS.
3
Fream
Wrocław software house building industrial IoT, AR, VR and mobile apps for Industry 4.0 and property clients.
Best for: Property developer or real estate firm that wants a VR walkthrough, a property app or an industrial IoT tool.
Verdict. Pick Fream for a property, VR or industrial app with a team of about 40 people behind it. Skip it if your buyer requires security certifications.
Pros
Shows real estate work for JLL and Skanska, plus its own Evryplace VR product.
Profitable in 2025, with 1.1M PLN of profit on 7.7M PLN of revenue.
Clutch shows 5.0 from 7 reviews at $25–49 per hour.
Names industrial clients such as DeLaval and Mondi.
Cons
The site says Fream started in 2009, while the current company dates from 2020 in KRS.
Lists no certifications or awards.
From their website and Clutch profile
The about page says Fream started in 2009 and has 40 people (source).
The footer shows KRS 0000870912, the company registered in 2020 (source).
Property work on the about page includes JLL VR, Homes by Skanska and the Evryplace product (source).
Two case studies cover DeLaval dairy apps, ESA and DelPro Companion (source).
Platform developmentData and AIEmbedded, IoT, PLC and firmware developmentLegacy software modernizationQA and maintenanceTechnology consultingJavaScriptAI
Homepage of rightinformation.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Right Information.
5
HUSPI
Rzeszów-headquartered software company with delivery in Ukraine that builds fintech, edtech, proptech and healthtech products.
Fintech software (payments, AML, open banking)EdTech platformsPropTech and digital auctionsHealthTech appsWeb and mobile developmentIT staff augmentation
Homepage of huspi.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to HUSPI.
6
Pirxon
Gdańsk automation firm that delivers RPA, AI agents and low-code on Microsoft Power Platform for mid-size companies.
Best for: Polish mid-size companies that want back-office processes automated with RPA and Power Platform at a fixed price.
Verdict. Call Pirxon for a fixed-scope automation project. Its employee reviews are the worst in this batch, so write named people and team continuity into the contract.
Pros
Profitable in 2025, with a profit of 415K PLN on 6.3M PLN of revenue.
Holds 4.9 on Clutch from 17 reviews and names Jungheinrich, Energa and Fakturownia in case studies.
Sells RPA and Power Platform work at a fixed price.
Cons
GoWork employee reviews are 2 positive and 17 negative, and the latest dates from 2026.
KRS registered the current company in 2024, while the site claims over 20 years and Clutch says 2004.
Microsoft and UiPath appear in its Clutch name, but the site claims no formal partner status.
From their website and Clutch profile
The site claims over 20 years and 550+ RPA and AI projects, while the current company in KRS dates from 2024 (source).
The footer says sp. z o.o., while one testimonial refers to PIRXON SA (source).
Microsoft and UiPath appear in the Clutch name, but the site claims no formal partner status (source).
Pirxon offers two products of its own, AssetsNinja and SmartReactor (source).
Process discovery and consultingRPALow-code applicationsAI agentsPower Platform and Copilot trainingAI
Homepage of pirxon.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Pirxon.
Every company we checked
The table below has the 31 companies with AR/VR evidence in Poland, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.
All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.
Who is not in the top 6, and why
Body leasing, product companies and other services
Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.
Commoditech · Warsaw
Alphamoon · Wrocław
Website not confirmed
The website could not be tied to the registered company. Without that I cannot tell whose filing and reviews I am reading, so the company is not ranked.
Nebucode · Warsaw
RTE · Warsaw
Ranked 11th and below
They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.
Transition Technologies PSC
Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders
Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.
Raving Bots · Wrocław
Toucan Systems
Alcosi Group · Wrocław
Le Polish Bureau
Weak evidence for AR/VR
They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.
4Experience
JetSoftPro · Wrocław
itSilesia
N-iX Games
HQSoftware
To Get There Foundation
Virtual Nomad · n/d
PixelPlex
Beetroot AB
SoftwareHut
UASOFTDEV
ZenBit Tech
+ 1 more in the full table
What they charge
On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 25 to 49 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.
For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.
25-49 USD/h15
50-99 USD/h15
100-149 USD/h1
150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 31 companies with an office in Poland.
Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes
Ask which headsets and devices they shipped to and how users get the app. Distribution through enterprise device management differs from public stores.
Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.
Get offers from the best-fit agencies
Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours
Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.
How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 30, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.
Questions
What are the best AR/VR development companies in Poland in 2027?
By the score on this page: 1. xBerry (65), 2. NeuroSYS (61), 3. Fream (57), 4. Right Information (54), 5. HUSPI (53). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.
How much do AR/VR agencies in Poland charge?
Most companies in this table declare 25 to 49 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.
How do you know a company does AR/VR?
From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.
Did any company pay to be on this list?
No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.
Can I get my company added or corrected?
Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.
The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.
Disclosures
Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.
Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.
“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation
Confidential by default. NDA is standard. I never show your project, name or screenshots without written consent, which is why this site names no clients without permission.
Your code, your accounts. Code and data stay in your repository and accounts. AI tools run with training on your data turned off, and secrets never reach a model.
A handover you can use. Every project ends with the same checklist: a README that gets it running, one architecture diagram, written decisions, CI, a runbook and a recorded walkthrough. It is done when someone outside the project can run it from the docs.
Boring technology where it counts. I pick a stack you can hire for. Anything experimental needs your yes and an exit plan.
Approach matched to your risk appetite. Prototype, product or regulated: the level decides how much autonomy the agents get and how much review and validation each change needs.
Everything checkable. Every number on my pages links to its source. My tools are free, and the idea validator skill is open source (MIT).
My pledge
Reply within 24 hours. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally, not a bot. Weekend messages: by Monday noon.
Late means free. If I am late, the first hour of work is free. You do not have to ask.
Scope in writing within 24 hours. A free 30-minute call with no company deck, then the scope and the price in writing within 24 hours. You decide.
The person who does the work. You talk to the person who does the work. No sales layer, no handoff.
Follow-up only with news. I follow up only when I have something new for you. Never a "did you see my offer".
Honest "not a fit". If I am not the right person, I say so on the call and point you to someone who is.