ciunkos.comRankings

Startups and MVPs in Warsaw, ranked for 2027

Best startups and MVPs software houses in Warsaw

Ask for products they built that raised money or reached paying users, and how many people sat on the MVP. A team of six burns a seed round fast. I found 98 companies with an office in Warsaw that show startups and MVPs work in at least one source (98 by their Clutch profile), and checked each in the court register, its latest filing and its employee reviews. 82 meet the ranking criteria and the 10 highest scores are below. If one senior engineer is enough, I build MVPs with AI agents.

In short: The highest-scoring startups and MVPs software houses in Warsaw for 2027 are Andersen (score 82), Fively (score 80) and Devapo (score 80). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.

Get matched offers in 24 hoursSee the top 10Download the data (CSV)

  • 98companies checked
  • 40verified in KRS
  • 38with a financial statement
  • 40with an employee review profile
  • 10ranked

Which company fits your project

  • AndersenSmall businesses (under 10M USD revenue) are 40% of its clients on Clutch. Score 82, 4.9 on Clutch from 129 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • FivelySmall businesses (under 10M USD revenue) are 80% of its clients on Clutch. Score 80, 5.0 on Clutch from 30 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • DevapoSmall businesses (under 10M USD revenue) are 40% of its clients on Clutch. Score 80, 4.9 on Clutch from 9 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • GLOBALDEVSmall businesses (under 10M USD revenue) are 45% of its clients on Clutch. Score 79, 4.9 on Clutch from 116 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • One senior instead of a teamIf the project fits one person with coding agents, hire me for MVPs before you pay an agency margin.

The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows startups and MVPs work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.

The top 10 at a glance

Click a column to sort.

#CompanyPeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Andersenprofit 363K PLN (2025)
1000-99994.9 · 12950–99 USD/hCustom software82
2
Fivelyprofit 93K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 3050–99 USD/hWeb and SaaS80
3
Devapoprofit 182K PLN (2025)GoWork 6/10
50-2494.9 · 950–99 USD/hProcess automation80
4
GLOBALDEVprofit 31K PLN (2025)foreign-owned
250-9994.9 · 11625–49 USD/hTeam extension79
5
Evojamprofit 95K PLN (2025)GoWork 6/1
10-494.9 · 1250–99 USD/hCustom software79
6
Sunscrapersprofit 485K PLN (2025)GoWork 6/11
10-494.9 · 3250–99 USD/h78
7
Clurgoprofit 205K PLN (2025)
50-2494.3 · 1125–49 USD/hEnterprise app modernization78
8
Civittaprofit 2.3M PLN (2025)foreign-owned
250-9994.9 · 2350–99 USD/hPublic-sector advisory77
9
SolveItprofit 156K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 5325–49 USD/hDiscovery phase76
10
Codinoprofit 182K PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 650–99 USD/hAgentic AI systems74

The ranking

The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how strong the startups and MVPs evidence is. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.

Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.

Andersen

Large international outsourcing company headquartered in Warsaw, selling dedicated teams and full-cycle development in 22 industries.

Clutch: 4.9 (129 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 50,000 USDVerified

Best for: Companies that need a large dedicated team fast, across many technologies, and can run it with their own product owner.

Pros

  • Clutch shows 129 reviews with a 4.9 rating and a Verified badge.
  • The Polish company reported 177.1M PLN of revenue in its 2025 filing.
  • Andersen has headquarters in Warsaw and a Kraków development center. Its named work includes Deutsche Telekom and Samsung Electronics.

Cons

  • The margin is near zero, with a profit of 363K PLN on 177.1M PLN of revenue.
  • The Polish company dates from 2019, while the group claims 19 years. Other entities sit in Lithuania and Germany.
  • Our GoWork data has no employee reviews, and the job boards showed no open roles at the last snapshot. The minimum project is 50,000 USD.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page claims 3,500+ in-house experts, 2,000+ clients, 18 offices and 19 years of experience, with Warsaw as headquarters (source).
  • The footer names other legal entities, UAB Andersen Soft and Andersen Germany GmbH, so the Polish company is one of several (source).
  • Many case studies are under NDA, and the named ones include Deutsche Telekom and Samsung Electronics (source).
  • The site announces the Claude Partner Network and AWS MSP partnership (source).

Clients they name: Samsung Electronics, Deutsche Telekom, BNP Paribas, Verivox, TUI

Custom software developmentStaff augmentation and dedicated teamsAI and dataCloud and DevOpsCybersecurityCRM and ERPAI
Andersen homepage
Homepage of andersenlab.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Andersen.

Verdict. Use Andersen to scale a team you lead, backed by 129 Clutch reviews. Check who signs the contract, given the thin Polish margin and the multi-entity setup.

Fively

Warsaw-registered software firm for startups, with a Dubai entity, building web, SaaS and AI apps.

Clutch: 5.0 (30 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: A startup founder who needs a web MVP or SaaS, with PHP or Shopify work in scope.

Pros

  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 30 reviews.
  • Publishes budget ranges of 25,000 to 100,000+ USD in its FAQ.
  • Shows 49 case studies, many with named clients like Insly and WebinarNinja.
  • Revenue reached 12.5M PLN in 2025.

Cons

  • Thin margin in 2025, with 93K PLN of profit on 12.5M PLN of revenue.
  • The Polish company dates from 2022, younger than the 2018 story on the site.
  • Had zero open roles at the last snapshot and no GoWork reviews.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page says the story began in 2018, while KRS registered the Polish company in 2022. (source)
  • The FAQ puts typical budgets at 25,000 to 100,000+ USD and the average project at 9 months. (source)
  • The case studies page lists 49 projects, with PHP tagged in 5, Magento in one and Shopify in one. (source)
  • The about page names a second entity, Fively Software Engineering FZCO in Dubai. (source)

Clients they name: Insly, Volt, AviMedical, WebinarNinja, ComFi, Uniqkey, Inzmo

Web and SaaS developmentAI chatbots and RAGMobile appsCloud migration and API developmentTeam augmentation and dedicated teamsLegacy re-engineeringAI
Fively homepage
Homepage of fively.dev, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Fively.

Verdict. Fively fits a startup MVP with a budget in its published range. Ask which entity signs, Warsaw or Dubai, before you start.

Devapo

Warsaw process automation and integration house built around Camunda and IBM, with an Amsterdam entity.

Clutch: 4.9 (9 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Insurers, telecoms and banks automating processes on Camunda or IBM BPM, or integrating legacy systems.

Pros

  • Devapo focuses on process automation on Camunda and IBM. It maintains an open-source Camunda connector and gives conference talks.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 9 reviews, and the job boards showed 14 open roles, 9 of them remote.
  • Devapo reported a profit of 182K PLN on 12.7M PLN of revenue in 2025.
  • The site lists a team of 62 by role, and an Amsterdam entity serves Dutch clients.

Cons

  • Employee reviews lean negative (6 positive, 10 negative).
  • The margin is thin, and several references are other software houses, which suggests subcontracting.
  • Most of the 13 case studies hide the client. The founding year differs, with 2016 on the site and 2018 in KRS.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page gives 2016 as the founding year and lists 62 team members. KRS dates the company from 2018 (source).
  • Most of the 13 case studies do not name the client (source).
  • Several testimonials and Clutch reviewers are other software houses, such as Future Processing and SoftwareHut, which points to subcontracting (source).

Clients they name: Gränges, PKF Agility, Genesis, T-Mobile, Metronet

Process automation (Camunda, IBM BPM)AI process automationLegacy transformationData engineeringCustom developmentOutsourcing and staff augmentationKubernetesJavaPythonAzure
Devapo homepage
Homepage of devapo.io, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Devapo.

Verdict. Call Devapo for Camunda and BPM work. For a consumer app or a general product the niche does not help, and you should ask about the employee reviews.

GLOBALDEV

Globaldev Group sells AI-first engineering teams, team extension and AI consulting from hubs across Europe.

Clutch: 4.9 (116 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 50,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Product company that wants to add AI-focused engineers to its own team for months.

Pros

  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 116 reviews at $25–49 per hour.
  • The group claims 450+ in-house experts across 6 hubs in Europe.
  • Offers Claude implementation and AI readiness consulting next to engineering.

Cons

  • Mainly staffing, with team extension listed first and recruitment and HR management inside the service.
  • The Polish company earned 2.4M PLN in 2025 with 31K PLN of profit, so most of the group works elsewhere.
  • The site gives no Polish address, and the Clutch minimum project is $50,000.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page claims 450+ in-house experts, 6 development hubs across Europe and 15 years in the market (source).
  • The contact page lists phone numbers for Israel, Europe and the USA and no Polish address (source).
  • The Global Teams service covers recruitment, onboarding, HR and account management for extension teams (source).
  • The home page presents Globaldev as a Claude certified services partner (source).

Clients they name: ECIT, SAKANI

Team extensionCustom software developmentAI consulting and Claude implementationGenAI and AI developmentData analytics and data annotationCloud migration and DevOpsAI
GLOBALDEV homepage
Homepage of globaldev.tech, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to GLOBALDEV.

Verdict. Pick Globaldev to extend your team with AI-focused engineers at a mid-market rate. Skip it if you want a Polish team you can visit.

Evojam

Warsaw software consultancy working since 2014, building web and mobile apps for startups and real estate companies.

Clutch: 4.9 (12 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Proptech firms and startups that need an MVP or a TypeScript platform, blockchain included, starting with discovery.

Pros

  • GoWork reviews lean positive, with 6 positive entries against 1 negative.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 12 reviews.
  • Named clients include Autogala, Kompas Inwestycji and Taskworld.
  • Clutch puts 75% of its work in custom software and 20% in blockchain.

Cons

  • Profit in 2025 was 95K PLN on 5.3M PLN of revenue, a thin margin.
  • Several case studies describe clients only by city, without a name.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page names startups and real estate as its primary focus since 2014. (source)
  • Case studies include a blockchain protocol in Scala for a San Francisco company and an anti-piracy video system. (source)
  • The Autogala app was built by a designer, five developers and a project manager. (source)
  • The privacy policy gives KRS 0000522575, matching the register. (source)

Clients they name: Autogala, Kompas Inwestycji, Enthought, Otro Global, Buildo, Virtual Control, Taskworld

Custom software developmentProduct discovery workshopsUX/UI designCode and architecture auditsERP and CRM with Open MercatoESG data and digital twins for proptech

Verdict. Pick Evojam for a proptech or startup MVP with discovery up front. Skip it if you need a large team fast.

Sunscrapers

Clutch: 4.9 (32 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Pros

  • Profit of 485K PLN (2025)
  • Owned by private individuals (KRS)
  • 4.9 on Clutch from 32 reviews

Cons

  • Mostly negative employee reviews on GoWork (6 positive, 11 negative)
Sunscrapers homepage
Homepage of sunscrapers.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Sunscrapers.

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and stability. Weakest axis: activity (2.0/5).

Clurgo

Warsaw engineering company working since 2014, supplying Java teams and modernization for finance, insurance and telecom.

Clutch: 4.3 (11 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Banks, insurers and media groups that need Java or TypeScript engineers to modernize legacy systems at scale.

Pros

  • Revenue reached 27.5M PLN in 2025.
  • Clutch puts 70% of its work in enterprise app modernization.
  • It had 27 open roles at the last snapshot, 8 of them remote, so it can staff up fast.

Cons

  • Clurgo is mainly IT staffing, and its job ads place people inside client teams.
  • Profit in 2025 was 205K PLN on 27.5M PLN of revenue.
  • GoWork shows 3 negative entries against 1 positive, and Clutch shows 4.3 from 11 reviews.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page offers to act as a dedicated in-house team and to give access to software professionals. (source)
  • Case studies cover claims processing for 22 million customers and postal shipping, without client names. (source)
  • The careers page lists Java, data warehouse and ServiceNow roles, one located at a client office park. (source)
  • The contact page gives NIP 5272712409 and Jasna 14/16a, matching the register. (source)
Enterprise app modernizationCustom software developmentDedicated development teamsCloud and DevOps (AWS, Azure)Data engineeringUX/UI designJavaKubernetesDockerPython
Clurgo homepage
Homepage of www.clurgo.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Clurgo.

Verdict. Use Clurgo to add Java engineers to a bank or insurer modernization program. Skip it for a startup MVP.

Civitta

Polish arm of the Civitta consulting group, selling advisory, EU funding support and digital product development.

Clutch: 4.9 (23 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Energy or infrastructure company that needs a digital product tied to an EU grant application.

Pros

  • Combines software work with EU funding advice, useful when a project depends on a grant.
  • Profitable in 2025, with 2.3M PLN of profit on 14.7M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 23 reviews.
  • Has four offices in Poland, in Warsaw, Kraków, Poznań and Kielce.

Cons

  • The Polish company is mainly a consultancy, and software is one of three business lines.
  • Named Polish clients come from funding projects, with no Polish software case study on the page.
  • The Clutch minimum project is $25,000.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The Polish page lists consulting, funding and digital solutions as its three areas (source).
  • KRS 0000989737 and NIP 5272670467 on the page match the registry record (source).
  • Named Polish clients include Greenvolt, Polenergia eMobility and METRANS, mostly on funding projects (source).
  • The group site claims 750+ team members across consulting, funding and digital work (source).

Clients they name: Greenvolt, Polenergia eMobility, GRENERGY, METRANS (Polonia), FreshMail, Enetecs

Public-sector advisoryStrategic advisoryEU and national fundingSoftware developmentUX/UI designDigital marketingAI
Civitta homepage
Homepage of civitta.com/pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Civitta.

Verdict. Pick Civitta when a digital project depends on EU or national funding. Look for a dedicated software house if you only need code.

SolveIt

Mobile and web app studio with Warsaw, San Francisco and Stockholm addresses, built around MVPs.

Clutch: 5.0 (53 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Startups building a mobile-first MVP for e-commerce, real estate or a marketplace, with UX/UI design included.

Pros

  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 53 reviews and a Premier Verified badge.
  • Clutch rates of 25 to 49 USD per hour sit at the low end of the market.
  • The portfolio shows a shipped real estate rental app.
  • Discovery and UX/UI design come before any code.

Cons

  • Profit was thin in 2025, 156K PLN on 6.8M PLN of revenue.
  • The footer names SolveIt Inc., so confirm which entity signs the contract.
  • Outstaffing sits next to project work, so ask whether you get a team or rented developers.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page says the team has worked since 2016 and has 50+ in-house professionals. (source)
  • The footer names SolveIt Inc. and shows no Polish legal entity. (source)
  • The portfolio includes a real estate rental app and an RV travel app. (source)
  • The home page promises an MVP within 3 months and specialists within 3+ days. (source)

Clients they name: Out Co., Hemie, DentMe, Gumb, Baibe Bytes AB

Discovery phaseUI/UX designMobile app development (iOS, Android, Flutter)Web app developmentMVP developmentDedicated teams and outstaffing
SolveIt homepage
Homepage of solveit.dev, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to SolveIt.

Verdict. Choose SolveIt for a mobile MVP on a modest budget. For a complex back-office system, ask for matching references first.

Codino

Warsaw AI and software company building agents, document automation and custom apps.

Clutch: 5.0 (6 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Mid-size companies that want an AI agent or document and email automation wired into their existing systems.

Pros

  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 6 reviews.
  • Profitable in 2025, with 182K PLN of profit on 2.8M PLN of revenue.
  • AI services cover agents, RAG assistants and email automation for daily operations.
  • A 25,000 USD minimum on Clutch fits a first AI pilot.

Cons

  • The founding year and address on the site differ from the registry, which shows 2022 and Puławska 77.
  • The case studies page returns 404, so ask for references.
  • The site shows no logistics project despite the logistics ranking.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page says the company was founded in 2015 and has over 40 professionals, while the registry dates it to 2022. (source)
  • The site gives al. Ludwika Narbutta 53/6 as the address, while the registry lists Puławska 77. (source)
  • The home page claims 40+ client businesses and shows logos including Nextbike and Centogene. (source)
  • The Nextbike CTO testimonial says the team blended into his company culture. (source)

Clients they name: Recast, Copa, Nextbike, Centogene, ZipZero, Axisrooms

Agentic AI systemsDocument and email automationKnowledge and RAG assistantsCustom ML modelsCustom application developmentDedicated teamsAI
Codino homepage
Homepage of codino.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Codino.

Verdict. Try Codino for a small AI automation pilot with a clear scope. Ask for case studies and the contracting entity before a larger build.

Every company we checked

The table below has the 98 companies with startups and MVPs evidence in Warsaw, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.

Show all 98 companies
Size: Rate: · 98
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
AndersenCustom software
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 12950–99 USD/h177.1M PLN363K PLNCustom software82WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
2
FivelyWeb and SaaS
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3050–99 USD/h12.5M PLN93K PLNWeb and SaaS80WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
3
DevapoProcess automation
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 950–99 USD/h12.7M PLN182K PLNProcess automation80WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
4
GLOBALDEVTeam extension
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 11625–49 USD/h2.4M PLN31K PLNTeam extension79WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
5
EvojamCustom software
Warsaw10-494.9 · 1250–99 USD/h5.3M PLN95K PLNCustom software79WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
6Warsaw10-494.9 · 3250–99 USD/h17.7M PLN485K PLN78WebsiteClutchKRS
7
ClurgoEnterprise app modernization
Warsaw50-2494.3 · 1125–49 USD/h27.5M PLN205K PLNEnterprise app modernization78WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
8
CivittaPublic-sector advisory
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 2350–99 USD/h14.7M PLN2.3M PLNPublic-sector advisory77WebsiteClutchKRS
9
SolveItDiscovery phase
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 5325–49 USD/h6.8M PLN156K PLNDiscovery phase76WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
10
CodinoAgentic AI systems
Warsaw10-495.0 · 650–99 USD/h2.8M PLN182K PLNAgentic AI systems74WebsiteClutchKRS
–
NG Logictoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.7 · 825–49 USD/h16.4M PLN1.5M PLNAI73WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Niwarttoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1525–49 USD/h1.3M PLN144K PLN73WebsiteClutchKRS
–
SoftTecotoo little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.8 · 1625–49 USD/h17.3M PLN486K PLNAI73WebsiteClutchKRS
–
ITSharkztoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 1325–49 USD/h7.3M PLN461K PLN72WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Webalizetoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1925–49 USD/h1.2M PLN144K PLNCustom web applications72WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
DDI Developmenttoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 725–49 USD/h3.6M PLN123K PLNMVP and SaaS71WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
ImpiCodetoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h4.3M PLN318K PLNWeb applications71WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Sinova Developmenttoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 750–99 USD/h1.1M PLN182K PLNAI71WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Boring Owltoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h1.9M PLN153K PLN70WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Magediatoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.8 · 1125–49 USD/h3.3M PLN116K PLN70WebsiteClutchKRS
–
spinbits.iotoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 1550–99 USD/h474K PLN72K PLN70WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Syntech Softwaretoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 1125–49 USD/h1.2M PLN36K PLN69WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Codefiatoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 850–99 USD/h725K PLN11K PLN68WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Computoolstoo little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 10625–49 USD/h1.6M PLN-387K PLNIT consulting and business analysis68WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
FASTSITEtoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 725–49 USD/h46K PLN1K PLN68WebsiteClutchKRS
–
JCD.PLtoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 625–49 USD/h1.9M PLN26K PLNAI68WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Mainsofttoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 1750–99 USD/h3.8M PLN-150K PLNProduct67WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Iteratorstoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 1150–99 USD/h5.4M PLN-37K PLN66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Logic Softwebsite not confirmed
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1325–49 USD/h399K PLN17K PLNAI66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Routine Automationtoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 1850–99 USD/h6.4M PLN-498K PLN64WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Dynevo Grouptoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 825–49 USD/h4.1M PLN-177K PLN63WebsiteClutchKRS
–
ImproveIT Solutionstoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 2825–49 USD/h1.3M PLN-88K PLNAI61WebsiteClutchKRS
–
PAGEARTtoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 3950–99 USD/hn/an/a60WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Bit Adventuretoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 625–49 USD/h362K PLN-13K PLN59WebsiteClutchKRS
–
PRAStoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 925–49 USD/h5K PLN-15K PLN59WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Softellartoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h44K PLN-110K PLN59WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Efigencetoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 925–49 USD/h29.2M PLN-4.7M PLN58WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Softvoyatoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.7 · 525–49 USD/h1.6M PLN-125K PLNAI57WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Appotypetoo little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.8 · 625–49 USD/h1.9M PLN-314K PLNMedtech software56WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
TeaCodetoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 3850–99 USD/hn/an/aAI52WebsiteClutch
–
Empattoo little client evidence
n/a250-9995.0 · 15125–49 USD/hn/an/a51WebsiteClutch
–
Startup Housetoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/aPython51WebsiteClutch
–
Cyboticxtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 46100–149 USD/hn/an/aAI47WebsiteClutch
–
eintoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3250–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
FocusReactivetoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2950–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Fulcrumtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4025–49 USD/hn/an/aAI47WebsiteClutch
–
GOGOmediatoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1750–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Lomray Softwaretoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1925–49 USD/hn/an/aAI47WebsiteClutch
–
Orangesofttoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4250–99 USD/hn/an/a47WebsiteClutch
–
Exoretoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/a46WebsiteClutch
–
Humain Dev Systemstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1425–49 USD/hn/an/a46WebsiteClutch
–
Sensi Labstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2725–49 USD/hn/an/a46WebsiteClutch
–
7ninjastoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 1450–99 USD/hn/an/a45WebsiteClutch
–
Codeshinetoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/hn/an/a45WebsiteClutch
–
Dashbouquet Developmenttoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3450–99 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
Escolatoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3550–99 USD/hn/an/a45WebsiteClutch
–
iRonin.ITtoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 3350–99 USD/hn/an/a45WebsiteClutch
–
Rubyroid Labstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 5750–99 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
Shelpuk AI Technology Consultingtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1050–99 USD/hn/an/aAI45WebsiteClutch
–
Wise Visiontoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1225–49 USD/hn/an/a45WebsiteClutch
–
Aligned Codetoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
Atomic Actionstoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
codequesttoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2650–99 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
CodiLimetoo little client evidence
n/a250-9994.8 · 250–99 USD/hn/an/aPython44WebsiteClutchKRS
–
GetInData now Xebiatoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 13n/an/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
Hygge Softwaretoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1525–49 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
iomicotoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
LAB325too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 825–49 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
Lightpoint Globaltoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1325–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
LINKERSOFT GROUPtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 825–49 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
LLInformaticstoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
MVP Development Companytoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 2350–99 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Quantumtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1550–99 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
Romaniuk AItoo little client evidence
n/aFreelancer5.0 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/aAI44WebsiteClutch
–
Atomifyunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 525–49 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
Defaulttoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1425–49 USD/hn/an/a43WebsiteClutch
–
GO ONLINEtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
KnubiSofttoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 3625–49 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
Sunmait Technologiestoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 950–99 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
UASOFTDEVtoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch
–
Demjeetoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/a42WebsiteClutch
–
INtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 425–49 USD/hn/an/aAI42WebsiteClutch
–
BeeCommerce.plunder 10 people
n/a2-94.9 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/aAI41WebsiteClutch
–
For Better Futuretoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/a41WebsiteClutch
–
Meant4.comtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 650–99 USD/hn/an/aAI41WebsiteClutch
–
CleverLabstoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/aAI40WebsiteClutch
–
MintyMinttoo little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 325–49 USD/hn/an/aAI40WebsiteClutch
–
PinoByteunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 225–49 USD/hn/an/aAI40WebsiteClutch
–
QED Softwaretoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2100–149 USD/hn/an/aAI40WebsiteClutch
–
Readiytoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2n/an/an/a40WebsiteClutch
–
EMFIREtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 225–49 USD/hn/an/a39WebsiteClutch
–
ENDORAtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 225–49 USD/hn/an/aAI39WebsiteClutch
–
IT Flow AIunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/aAI39WebsiteClutch
–
Madifftoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 450–99 USD/hn/an/aAI39WebsiteClutch
–
SuitedSoftunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 125–49 USD/hn/an/aAI39WebsiteClutch
–
Noctuaitoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 350–99 USD/hn/an/aAI38WebsiteClutch
–
DigiWaytoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.4 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/a37WebsiteClutch
–
Syntropicunder 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 125–49 USD/hn/an/aAI37WebsiteClutch

All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.

Who is not in the top 10, and why

Paid placements and “serves the city” without an office

On the Clutch city list the first positions are bought with ads (links through ppc.clutch.co) or a “serves” entry. These companies have no office in the city according to KRS or their own site, so they are not ranked here.

None in this city.

Struck off the register or in liquidation

They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.

None in this city.

Body leasing, product companies and other services

Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.

None in this city.

On the city’s Clutch list, but based elsewhere

Clutch shows them on this city’s page, but KRS and our data do not confirm an office here. They are ranked in their own city.

None in this city.

Ranked 11th and below

They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.

  • NG Logic
  • Niwart
  • SoftTeco
  • ITSharkz
  • Webalize
  • DDI Development
  • ImpiCode
  • Sinova Development
  • Boring Owl
  • Magedia
  • spinbits.io
  • Syntech Software
  • and 60 more in the full table

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • Logic Soft
  • CodiLime
  • Atomify
  • IN
  • BeeCommerce.pl
  • MintyMint
  • PinoByte
  • QED Software
  • Readiy
  • EMFIRE
  • ENDORA
  • IT Flow AI
  • and 4 more in the full table

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h4750-99 USD/h47100-149 USD/h2150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 96 companies with an office in the city. In brackets: companies “serving” the city without an office.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Ask for products they built that raised money or reached paying users, and how many people sat on the MVP. A team of six burns a seed round fast.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement on rejestr.io: revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 28, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best startups and MVPs software houses in Warsaw in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Andersen (82), 2. Fively (80), 3. Devapo (80), 4. GLOBALDEV (79), 5. Evojam (79). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.

How much do startups and MVPs agencies in Warsaw charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does startups and MVPs?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,485companies in the data set
  • 708checked in the National Court Register
  • 453with a financial statement
  • 7,436Clutch listing positions read, paid ones marked
  • 451employee review profiles on GoWork
  • 2+months of data collection, since September 2026

The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.

Disclosures

  • I worked at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product until November 2026. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center