ciunkos.comRankings

Startups and MVPs in Wrocław, ranked for 2027

Best startups and MVPs software houses in Wrocław

Ask for products they built that raised money or reached paying users, and how many people sat on the MVP. A team of six burns a seed round fast. I found 30 companies with an office in Wrocław that show startups and MVPs work in at least one source (30 by their Clutch profile), and checked each in the court register, its latest filing and its employee reviews. 23 meet the ranking criteria and the 10 highest scores are below. If one senior engineer is enough, I build MVPs with AI agents.

In short: The highest-scoring startups and MVPs software houses in Wrocław for 2027 are Zaven (score 90), xBerry (score 86) and Blurify (score 85). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.

Get matched offers in 24 hoursSee the top 10Download the data (CSV)

  • 30companies checked
  • 25verified in KRS
  • 24with a financial statement
  • 22with an employee review profile
  • 10ranked

Which company fits your project

  • ZavenSmall businesses (under 10M USD revenue) are 60% of its clients on Clutch. Score 90, 5.0 on Clutch from 15 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • xBerrySmall businesses (under 10M USD revenue) are 60% of its clients on Clutch. Score 86, 5.0 on Clutch from 11 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • BlurifySmall businesses (under 10M USD revenue) are 60% of its clients on Clutch. Score 85, 5.0 on Clutch from 26 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • DO OKSmall businesses (under 10M USD revenue) are 50% of its clients on Clutch. Score 77, 4.8 on Clutch from 42 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • One senior instead of a teamIf the project fits one person with coding agents, hire me for MVPs before you pay an agency margin.

The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows startups and MVPs work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.

The top 10 at a glance

Click a column to sort.

#CompanyPeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Zavenprofit 1.1M PLN (2025)GoWork 6/1
10-495.0 · 1525–49 USD/hCustom software90
2
xBerryprofit 3.5M PLN (2025)GoWork 6/3
50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/hComputer vision for quality inspection86
3
Blurifyprofit 309K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 2650–99 USD/hCustom software85
4
DO OKprofit 905K PLN (2025)GoWork 3/12
50-2494.8 · 4250–99 USD/hCustom software77
5
Antologicprofit 4.4M PLN
50-2494.9 · 850–99 USD/hweb77
6
Accestoprofit 280K PLN (2025)
10-494.9 · 2050–99 USD/hPHP application modernization76
7
Rite NRGprofit 2.3M PLN (2024)
50-2494.9 · 1650–99 USD/hSoftware consulting and engineering76
8
Freamprofit 1.1M PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 725–49 USD/hCustom software72
9
Lama Mediaprofit 42K PLN (2025)
10-494.9 · 925–49 USD/hCustom WordPress70
10
Ulan Softwareprofit 261K PLN (2024)
10-495.0 · 125–49 USD/hWeb and mobile68

The ranking

The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how strong the startups and MVPs evidence is. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.

Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.

Zaven

Process-driven software house building web and mobile apps for construction, real estate and utilities companies, mainly Nordic.

Clutch: 5.0 (15 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: A web or mobile product for a construction, real-estate or utilities company that wants a small, steady team in Wrocław and does not need a brand name.

Pros

  • Profitable every year in the filings we checked, with the latest statement showing a profit of 1.1M PLN on 12.7M PLN of revenue.
  • Employee reviews on GoWork are positive (6 positive, 1 negative), the rarest thing on this list.
  • Twenty named case studies, most of them Norwegian construction and marine clients, so you can check the work.
  • Publishes its own scale on the about page: roughly ten projects a year. Few agencies admit how small they are.
  • Still hiring on the job boards (2 open roles on October 27, 2026).

Cons

  • Since September 2026 fully owned by Multishoring Holdings, a Warsaw data and integration consultancy, so strategy is decided outside Wrocław.
  • Fifteen Clutch reviews only, and the declared rate band of 25 to 49 USD is the offshore band, which raises the question of who writes the code.
  • A team of 10 to 49 cannot staff several roles at once; expect a queue for bigger projects.
  • Founding year differs between the site, Clutch and the court register.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The site publishes its scale, with roughly 10 projects per year and about EUR 3M turnover in 2025 (source).
  • The site lists twenty named case studies, most of them Norwegian construction and marine clients such as Fonn, Grasp and Safran (source).
  • Age claims do not line up. The site says 15 years in business, Clutch says founded 2011, and the KRS entry in our file dates from 2014 (source).
  • The site shows no certifications, awards or partner badges (source).

Clients they name: Volve, Fonn, Grasp, Safran, Dionach, Bonduelle

Custom softwareMobile appsGenerative AICustom MCP developmentProduct UX/UI designStaff augmentationReactVueAngular.NET
Zaven homepage
Homepage of zaven.co, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Zaven.

Verdict. The most transparent small software house in Wrocław. It is profitable, its own people rate it well, and it publishes its size. Hire it for one well-defined product, not for a platform that needs five roles.

xBerry

Remote R&D team building physical AI, including computer vision, embedded systems and robotics software, for manufacturers and logistics.

Clutch: 5.0 (11 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 5,000 USD

Best for: Manufacturers and logistics companies that need computer vision, embedded AI or robotics software, from an MVP to a production system.

Pros

  • The only hardware-adjacent house in the top 10: vision inspection, robotics, edge AI, backed by an EU regional development grant.
  • Profit of 3.5M PLN on 13.3M PLN of revenue in 2025, two private individuals as owners, 3 open roles on the boards.
  • A 5.0 rating on Clutch from 11 reviews and a rare price signal on the site: a simple MVP starts from tens of thousands of euros.
  • Employee reviews are positive (6 positive, 3 negative).

Cons

  • Five GoWork reviews mention layoffs or cuts despite the positive overall tone.
  • Most case studies hide the client; only a few are named.
  • Founding year differs between the site, Clutch and the court register (2019 in KRS).

From their website and Clutch profile

  • xBerry is the only hardware-adjacent firm in the set, working on robotics, embedded AI and vision inspection. The site shows an EU regional development grant badge (source).
  • The FAQ gives a price signal, saying a simple MVP starts from tens of thousands of euros (source).
  • The founding year conflicts, with 2016 on the site, 2015 on Clutch and 2019 in the KRS entry in our file (source).
  • Most case studies hide the client (our Swedish partner, a leading vaccine manufacturer). Only Coco and Szajna are named, and CSHARK appears as a testimonial giver (source).

Clients they name: Coco, Szajna, Balluff, Fraunhofer, Formic, Digiteq

Computer vision for quality inspectionIoT and embedded AIRobotics softwareEdge AIERP and IoT integrationMVP to production R&DEmbeddedPython.NETAI
xBerry homepage
Homepage of xberry.tech, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to xBerry.

Verdict. A specialist, and the numbers back it up. If your product has a camera, a sensor or a robot in it, start here; if it is a web app, look elsewhere on this list.

Blurify

Wrocław software house building custom web and mobile apps on AWS for education, industry and, on its English site, iGaming.

Clutch: 5.0 (26 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Polish education, industry and public-sector clients who want a 50+ team with a Wrocław office, and iGaming companies through its English brand.

Pros

  • A 5.0 rating on Clutch from 26 reviews with named Polish clients such as Fundacja Orange and WSiP.
  • Profitable in 2025 (309K PLN on 9.3M PLN of revenue), two private individuals as owners (KRS), hiring on the boards (3 open roles).
  • Publishes a three-month warranty on critical bugs after launch and offers a free estimate, which few agencies put in writing.

Cons

  • Two brands, one company: blurify.pl is a general software house, blurify.com sells casino and sportsbook products. Ask which team you get and whether the iGaming side matters to your compliance.
  • The legal entity is Studio Software Sp. z o.o., so search KRS by that name, not “Blurify”.
  • Thin margin: the 2025 profit is a few percent of revenue. Too few employee reviews on GoWork to read the mood.
  • The AWS claim is three individual certifications, not a partner tier.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • blurify.pl presents a general software house for Polish education and industry. blurify.com positions the company as an iGaming developer with casino and sportsbook products (source).
  • The site lists fifteen case studies, several with named Polish clients such as Fundacja Orange, WSiP and WAGO (source).
  • The legal entity is Studio Software Sp. z o.o., which matters when you check the KRS (source).
  • The AWS claim rests on three individual certifications rather than a partner tier (source).

Clients they name: Fundacja Orange (MegaMisja), WSiP, WKS Śląsk Wrocław, WAGO, Vemcon, LifeTraq

Custom softwareWeb appsMobile appsMVPAI solutionsAWS and cloudReactNext.jsNode.jsPostgreSQL
Blurify homepage
Homepage of blurify.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Blurify.

Verdict. Good client reviews and clear written terms, with one question to ask before signing: which of the two businesses would build your product.

DO OK

NewConnect-listed, four-times ISO certified software and IoT studio serving insurance, proptech, health and edtech clients in Northern Europe.

Clutch: 4.8 (42 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 5,000 USD

Best for: Nordic and Benelux clients who need ISO-certified processes (including 27018 for personal data in the cloud) and a team split between Wrocław and Tallinn.

Pros

  • Four ISO certificates (9001, 27001, 14001, 27018), the most of any company in the ranking, and a NewConnect listing since 2017.
  • 4.8 on Clutch from 42 reviews, offices in Tallinn and Aarhus, 3 open roles on the boards.
  • Profitable in 2025 (905K PLN on 13.5M PLN of revenue).

Cons

  • Employee reviews are negative (3 positive, 12 negative); read them before you sign.
  • A listed company (S.A.), so the shareholders are not in the court register.
  • The projects page renders empty without JavaScript, so case studies are hard to find.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • DO OK is the only firm in the set with four ISO certificates, including 27018 for personal data in the cloud. It debuted on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (NewConnect) in 2017 (source).
  • DO OK has offices in Tallinn and Aarhus, a Dutch branch since 2018 and a Danish one since 2019 (source).
  • The founding year conflicts, with 2010 on the site and 2016 in the KRS entry in our file, likely the S.A. conversion (source).
  • The projects listing renders empty without JavaScript, so case studies are reachable only via the industries page and direct links (source).

Clients they name: BEHA, Zilveren Kruis (Actify), YOLI, Versa, Optima Sport, Polish Press Agency (FakeHunter)

Custom softwareMobile appsIoT and cloudAI and machine learningProduct developmentTeam augmentationAI
DO OK homepage
Homepage of dook.pro, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to DO OK.

Verdict. Certificates and a public listing make it the easiest Wrocław agency to pass through a corporate procurement department. The employee reviews are the thing to ask about on the call.

Antologic

Clutch: 4.9 (8 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: n/a

Pros

  • Profit of 4.4M PLN (latest filing)

Cons

  • n/a
JavaScriptJavaRubySAP
Antologic homepage
Homepage of antologic.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Antologic.

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and specialization. Weakest axis: activity (2.0/5).

Accesto

Wrocław studio modernizing and scaling legacy PHP SaaS products with Symfony and Laravel.

Clutch: 4.9 (20 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 50,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: SaaS founders with an aging PHP codebase that needs upgrades, refactoring or scaling.

Pros

  • Focuses on one problem, legacy PHP modernization, with Symfony-certified developers.
  • Case studies report an 83% load-time cut for NotebookRank.
  • Profitable in 2025, with 280K PLN of profit on 3.9M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 20 reviews, with the Premier Verified badge.

Cons

  • A team of 15 developers limits how much parallel work it can take.
  • The minimum project on Clutch is $50,000.
  • Google Cloud and education, two ranking topics, have no support on the site.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page claims 16 years on the market and 15 developers with 8 years of average seniority (source)
  • Case studies report an 83% load-time cut for NotebookRank and 40% faster time to market for Placker (source)
  • Google Cloud appears only as a technology option, with no partnership stated (source)
  • The about page links a Docker e-book and the PHP at Scale newsletter (source)

Clients they name: Placker, NotebookRank, MediaHQ, Skylegs, WorkPanda, Healthgraphic

PHP application modernizationPHP upgrades and code reviewRefactoringSymfony developmentLaravel developmentDocker and cloudPHPSymfony
Accesto homepage
Homepage of accesto.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Accesto.

Verdict. Pick Accesto to rescue a PHP SaaS that slows down as it grows. For a new app outside PHP, look elsewhere.

Rite NRG

Wrocław software and AI engineering company supplying delivery teams, managed services and fixed-scope releases, with Web3 roots.

Clutch: 4.9 (16 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Scale-ups that must staff an engineering team quickly or ship a fixed-scope AI release.

Pros

  • Rite NRG reported a profit of 2.3M PLN on 26.6M PLN of revenue in 2024.
  • Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Central Europe recognized its growth in 2025.
  • Rite NRG offers a fixed-scope, fixed-price release path next to team supply.
  • Clutch shows 16 reviews averaging 4.9.

Cons

  • Clutch puts IT managed services at 60% of the work, so team supply is the core business.
  • Most case studies are anonymous, and only Metapro is named.
  • The latest filing in our data is for 2024, one year older than for most peers.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The awards page lists Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Central Europe 2025 and Fast 500 EMEA 2023 (source).
  • Most case studies are anonymous, and Metapro is the only client named on the homepage (source).
  • The site gives only a Wrocław address, while Clutch also lists Kraków and Malmö (source).
  • The homepage shows a 4.9 rating from 16 verified Clutch reviews (source).

Clients they name: Metapro

Software consulting and engineeringAI consulting and automationTechnology talent and teamsManaged technology servicesBlockchain and Web3Blockchain
Rite NRG homepage
Homepage of ritenrg.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Rite NRG.

Verdict. Use Rite NRG to scale a team quickly, backed by its Web3 and AI work. Ask for named references before a fixed-price build.

Fream

Wrocław software house building industrial IoT, AR, VR and mobile apps for Industry 4.0 and property clients.

Clutch: 5.0 (7 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Property developer or real estate firm that wants a VR walkthrough, a property app or an industrial IoT tool.

Pros

  • Shows real estate work for JLL and Skanska, plus its own Evryplace VR product.
  • Profitable in 2025, with 1.1M PLN of profit on 7.7M PLN of revenue.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 7 reviews at $25–49 per hour.
  • Names industrial clients such as DeLaval and Mondi.

Cons

  • The site says Fream started in 2009, while the current company dates from 2020 in KRS.
  • Lists no certifications or awards.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page says Fream started in 2009 and has 40 people (source).
  • The footer shows KRS 0000870912, the company registered in 2020 (source).
  • Property work on the about page includes JLL VR, Homes by Skanska and the Evryplace product (source).
  • Two case studies cover DeLaval dairy apps, ESA and DelPro Companion (source).

Clients they name: DeLaval, Mondi, Suometry, Naviexpert, JLL, Skanska, Lagardère

Custom software developmentMobile app developmentWeb app developmentUX/UI product designSoftware integrationsIndustrial IoT and vision apps
Fream homepage
Homepage of fream.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Fream.

Verdict. Pick Fream for a property, VR or industrial app with a team of about 40 people behind it. Skip it if your buyer requires security certifications.

Lama Media

Wrocław web agency building WordPress sites, e-commerce and web apps.

Clutch: 4.9 (9 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 5,000 USD

Best for: Universities, cultural institutions and mid-size firms that need a WordPress site or a recruitment portal.

Pros

  • The Wrocław University of Science and Technology site drew 37 000 users on its busiest day.
  • Won a Genius Universitatis Award for the university project.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 9 reviews and a 5,000 USD minimum.

Cons

  • Revenue was 322K PLN in 2025, so the team is small.
  • Most work is WordPress, so a complex web app falls outside its core.
  • The registry lists advertising as its main activity.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The footer reads 2006 - 2026, while the registry entry dates from 2013. (source)
  • The recruitment site for Wrocław University of Science and Technology drew 37 000 unique users on its busiest day. (source)
  • The Kalpak Travel case claims €300 000+ in first-year sales. (source)
  • The offer menu centers on WordPress, e-commerce and website maintenance. (source)

Clients they name: Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wielton S.A., Kalpak Travel, Olga Tokarczuk Foundation, Hydropolis, Radio LUZ

Custom WordPress developmentE-commerce developmentWeb applicationsWebsite maintenanceUX/UI designWordPress
Lama Media homepage
Homepage of lama-media.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Lama Media.

Verdict. Choose Lama Media for a university or company website on WordPress. For a SaaS or a complex web app, pick a larger software house.

Ulan Software

Wrocław software house building marketplaces, booking engines and low-code platforms, with its own product Bowwe.

Clutch: 5.0 (1 review)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Retailers and startups that need a marketplace, booking system or delivery app built on a ready engine.

Pros

  • Built a delivery app for IKEA and Taskrabbit.
  • Runs its own no-code product, Bowwe.
  • Earned 261K PLN of profit on 5.6M PLN of revenue in 2024.

Cons

  • Clutch shows a single review.
  • The site never mentions blockchain, so treat the Clutch blockchain listing with care.
  • The case studies page shows only two projects.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page claims a team of 53+ and 13+ years on the market (source).
  • The case studies page shows two projects, a delivery app for IKEA and Taskrabbit and the Bowwe no-code platform (source).
  • The site does not mention blockchain work, though Clutch lists it at 10% (source).
  • The home page footer gives NIP 899 286 43 10 and the Dąbrowskiego 42 address, matching KRS (source).

Clients they name: IKEA, Taskrabbit, Poczta Polska, PKO Bank Polski, Bowwe

Web and mobile developmentUX/UI designQA and DevOpsCTO as a serviceDedicated teams and team augmentationStartup studioAI
Ulan Software homepage
Homepage of ulansoftware.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Ulan Software.

Verdict. Use Ulan for a marketplace or booking product built on its engines. For blockchain work look elsewhere, since its site shows none.

Every company we checked

The table below has the 30 companies with startups and MVPs evidence in Wrocław, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.

Show all 30 companies
Size: Rate: · 30
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
ZavenCustom software
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1525–49 USD/h12.7M PLN1.1M PLNCustom software90WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
2
xBerryComputer vision for quality inspection
Wrocław50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/h13.3M PLN3.5M PLNComputer vision for quality inspection86WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
3
BlurifyCustom software
Wrocław50-2495.0 · 2650–99 USD/h9.3M PLN309K PLNCustom software85WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
4
DO OKCustom software
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 4250–99 USD/h13.5M PLN905K PLNCustom software77WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
5Wrocław50-2494.9 · 850–99 USD/h16.9M PLN4.4M PLNweb77WebsiteClutchKRS
6
AccestoPHP application modernization
Wrocław10-494.9 · 2050–99 USD/h3.9M PLN280K PLNPHP application modernization76WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
7
Rite NRGSoftware consulting and engineering
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 1650–99 USD/h26.6M PLN2.3M PLNSoftware consulting and engineering76WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
8
FreamCustom software
Wrocław10-495.0 · 725–49 USD/h7.7M PLN1.1M PLNCustom software72WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
9
Lama MediaCustom WordPress
Wrocław10-494.9 · 925–49 USD/h322K PLN42K PLNCustom WordPress70WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
10
Ulan SoftwareWeb and mobile
Wrocław10-495.0 · 125–49 USD/h5.6M PLN261K PLNWeb and mobile68WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Vazcoproduct company
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 1950–99 USD/h10.4M PLN417K PLNTS/React/Node80WebsiteClutchKRS
–
appwise software houseproduct company
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 2025–49 USD/h10.3M PLN174K PLNCustom TMS systems72WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
The Force Codetoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 225–49 USD/h1.1M PLN87K PLNNode.js71WebsiteClutchKRS
–
bards.aiproduct company
Wrocław2-95.0 · 225–49 USD/h1.9M PLN198K PLNNLP/AI66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Grinntoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 1350–99 USD/h20.1M PLN-695K PLNElectronics design66WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Sagitontoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 2050–99 USD/h10.8M PLN-458K PLNBusiness process automation66WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Satisflytoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-494.9 · 1350–99 USD/h7.5M PLN-99K PLNE-commerce strategy66WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Thaumatectoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/h1M PLN-23K PLNembedded66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Webinitoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.6 · 1150–99 USD/h156K PLN91K PLNPlatform design and MVP builds66WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
GRUPA INSIGHTtoo little client evidence
Marki10-495.0 · 250–99 USD/h1.1M PLN-49K PLNReact62WebsiteClutchKRS
–
iMakeabletoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1650–99 USD/hn/an/aWeb and mobile app62WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Awakasttoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 250–99 USD/h203K PLN6K PLNAI61WebsiteClutchKRS
–
ULAM LABStoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 1350–99 USD/h235K PLN-194K PLNMedTech product60WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Gentle Codetoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 825–49 USD/h5.7M PLN-235K PLNJavaScript59WebsiteClutchKRS
–
The Masterswebsite not confirmed
Bestwina10-495.0 · 725–49 USD/h37K PLN-267K PLN56WebsiteClutchKRS
–
BrainForge IT: Software & Consultingtoo little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1850–99 USD/hn/an/aAI47WebsiteClutch
–
Codeskatoo little client evidence
n/d10-495.0 · 1725–49 USD/hn/an/aweb46WebsiteClutch
–
25wattoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2025–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Cognizetoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/aPHP43WebsiteClutch
–
Synebotoo little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/aAI43WebsiteClutch

All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.

Who is not in the top 10, and why

Paid placements and “serves the city” without an office

On the Clutch city list the first positions are bought with ads (links through ppc.clutch.co) or a “serves” entry. These companies have no office in the city according to KRS or their own site, so they are not ranked here.

None in this city.

Struck off the register or in liquidation

They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.

None in this city.

Body leasing, product companies and other services

Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.

  • Vazco
  • appwise software house
  • bards.ai

On the city’s Clutch list, but based elsewhere

Clutch shows them on this city’s page, but KRS and our data do not confirm an office here. They are ranked in their own city.

None in this city.

Ranked 11th and below

They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.

  • Grinn
  • Sagiton
  • Satisfly
  • Thaumatec
  • Webini
  • iMakeable
  • ULAM LABS
  • Gentle Code
  • BrainForge IT: Software & Consulting
  • Codeska · n/d
  • 25wat
  • Cognize
  • and 1 more in the full table

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • The Force Code
  • GRUPA INSIGHT · Marki
  • Awakast
  • The Masters · Bestwina

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h1150-99 USD/h19100-149 USD/h0150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 30 companies with an office in the city. In brackets: companies “serving” the city without an office.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Ask for products they built that raised money or reached paying users, and how many people sat on the MVP. A team of six burns a seed round fast.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement on rejestr.io: revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 28, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best startups and MVPs software houses in Wrocław in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Zaven (90), 2. xBerry (86), 3. Blurify (85), 4. DO OK (77), 5. Antologic (77). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.

How much do startups and MVPs agencies in Wrocław charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does startups and MVPs?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,485companies in the data set
  • 708checked in the National Court Register
  • 453with a financial statement
  • 7,436Clutch listing positions read, paid ones marked
  • 451employee review profiles on GoWork
  • 2+months of data collection, since September 2026

The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.

Disclosures

  • I worked at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product until November 2026. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center