Best media and entertainment software houses in Kraków

From their website and Clutch profile

• The home page gives three team sizes, 350+, 400+ and 320+. (source)
• The Kraków office sits in a coworking space on Zamoyskiego, while the register lists Szlak 77/222. (source)
• The site shows ISO 27001 and CREST badges and sells penetration testing next to development. (source)
• Clutch ties the Polish company Techmagic PL Sp. z o.o. to KRS 0000969230. (source)

Clients they name: Elements.cloud, Huckleberry, Bamboo, Tiro.health, Acorn-i, Good&Co, Corellium, MyTelescope

Verdict. Pick TechMagic for a healthtech or security-heavy product with compliance needs. On a small budget, its $25,000 minimum rules it out.

From their website and Clutch profile

• The site sells AI voice agents that answer and place calls, with plans from $29 a month (source)
• The site names no client companies, and its testimonials give only personal names and job titles (source)
• The footer shows ByVoice Sp. z o.o., KRS 0000916645, at ul. Zamknięta 10 in Kraków, matching the registry (source)
• The about page does not mention C++, embedded work or media clients (source)

Verdict. Pick byVoice for an AI phone agent on top of your existing telephony. Skip it for general product development.

From their website and Clutch profile

• The about page lists about 100 client names, including Sony Music UK, Robbie Williams and Sephora. (source)
• The work page shows 20 projects, mostly WordPress, headless CMS and WebGL sites, with no years. (source)
• The site claims 13 years of digital expertise, while KRS registered the company in 2019. (source)
• The contact page gives only the Długa 4/6 address in Kraków, with no legal name, NIP or KRS. (source)

Clients they name: Sony Music UK, Robbie Williams, Paloma Faith, Sephora, World Economic Forum, LPP, Grupa Polsat

Verdict. Owls Department fits a brand site where visuals and motion matter most. Skip it for a SaaS backend or a long product build.

From their website and Clutch profile

• The home page claims 400+ engineers and lists Reanimated, Gesture Handler and Screens among its React Native projects (source).
• Case studies include Photobucket, a content aggregator app and a group chat where live latency fell from 7 to 2 seconds (source).
• The contact page names Software Mansion S.A. at Zabłocie 43b in Kraków and gives 2012 as the founding year (source).
• The company runs an investor relations site as a joint-stock company (source).

Clients they name: Photobucket, Supabase, Partiful, Dscout, Turn.io, Perch, ChatBCC, Vibecode

Verdict. Pick Software Mansion for a React Native app where performance or media playback matters. Skip it for a small website or a tight budget.

From their website and Clutch profile

• The home page shows case studies for Legora, Kvantab and INTU, each with a quote from the client's founder (source).
• The founder also lists a technical lead role at Scape.App, a Y Combinator S24 startup (source).
• The company details page gives Jana Kantego Federowicza 5/96 in Kraków, while KRS lists Syrokomli 24/10 (source).
• Clutch shows 4.9 from 6 reviews, rates of $50–99 per hour and a $10,000 minimum project (source).

Clients they name: Legora, Kvantab, INTU, TruthSystems, Lovable, PushPushGo, dostanesie.pl, Lepsze Media

Verdict. Pick Alergeek for an MVP or an early product where you want to work with the founder directly. Skip it for a large program that needs several teams at once.

From their website and Clutch profile

• The home page says over 80% of the team are senior developers and project managers. (source)
• Case studies include a Flutter learning app for primary school pupils and a Xamarin to MAUI rewrite. (source)
• The site names no legal entity or address, and DOU lists offices in Kraków and Kyiv. (source)
• The blog announces a Clutch award as a top Ukrainian B2B firm. (source)

Clients they name: Admit.me, YOY

Verdict. Consider Implex for an edtech mobile app or a move off low-code. Ask which entity signs and where the team works.

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and specialization. Weakest axis: stability (1.0/5).

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and client reputation. Weakest axis: stability (1.0/5).

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and specialization. Weakest axis: activity (1.5/5).