I checked 65 companies with an office in Wrocław that show Azure work in at least one source (52 by their Clutch profile, 11 by their open roles on JustJoin.it, 14 by my Wrocław catalog) against the court register, their latest filing and their employee reviews. 29 meet the ranking criteria, and the 10 highest scores are below. If one senior engineer is enough, I build DevOps and cloud setups with AI agents.
In short: The highest-scoring Azure software houses in Wrocław for 2027 are Zaven (score 91), Grape Up (score 88) and Spyrosoft BSG (score 86). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.
ZavenA web or mobile product for a construction, real-estate or utilities company that wants a small, steady team in Wrocław and does not need a brand name. Azure is 90% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. 2 open roles with Azure in the requirements. Score 91, 5.0 on Clutch from 15 reviews, profit in 2025.
Grape UpAutomotive, finance and aviation enterprises modernizing legacy systems or building a cloud and data platform, with a budget above 50,000 USD. Azure is 50% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 88, 5.0 on Clutch from 6 reviews, profit in 2025.
Spyrosoft BSGBroadcasters and streaming services that need OTT, connected-TV and video apps, with named references at major European channels. Azure is 50% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 86, 4.9 on Clutch from 30 reviews, profit in 2024.
CSHARKFintech, regtech and industrial clients with a budget above 50,000 USD who want a mid-size Polish company with ISO 27001 and cloud partnerships. Azure is 40% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 86, 4.9 on Clutch from 19 reviews, profit in 2025.
One senior instead of a teamIf the project fits one person with coding agents, hire me for DevOps and cloud setups before you pay an agency margin.
The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows Azure work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.
The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how deep the company goes into Azure (its share of the Clutch profile and of open roles) and weighs 35% instead of 15%, so specialists rank above large generalists. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.
Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.
1
Zaven
Process-driven software house building web and mobile apps for construction, real estate and utilities companies, mainly Nordic.
Best for: A web or mobile product for a construction, real-estate or utilities company that wants a small, steady team in Wrocław and does not need a brand name.
Verdict. The most transparent small software house in Wrocław. It is profitable, its own people rate it well, and it publishes its size. Hire it for one well-defined product, not for a platform that needs five roles.
Pros
Profitable every year in the filings we checked, with the latest statement showing a profit of 1.1M PLN on 12.7M PLN of revenue.
Employee reviews on GoWork are positive (6 positive, 1 negative), the rarest thing on this list.
Twenty named case studies, most of them Norwegian construction and marine clients, so you can check the work.
Publishes its own scale on the about page: roughly ten projects a year. Few agencies admit how small they are.
Still hiring on the job boards.
Cons
Since September 2026 fully owned by Multishoring Holdings, a Warsaw data and integration consultancy, so strategy is decided outside Wrocław.
Fifteen Clutch reviews only, and the declared rate band of 25 to 49 USD is the offshore band, which raises the question of who writes the code.
A team of 10 to 49 cannot staff several roles at once; expect a queue for bigger projects.
Founding year differs between the site, Clutch and the court register.
From their website and Clutch profile
The site publishes its scale, with roughly 10 projects per year and about EUR 3M turnover in 2025 (source).
The site lists twenty named case studies, most of them Norwegian construction and marine clients such as Fonn, Grasp and Safran (source).
Age claims do not line up. The site says 15 years in business, Clutch says founded 2011, and the KRS entry in our file dates from 2014 (source).
The site shows no certifications, awards or partner badges (source).
Best for: Automotive, finance and aviation enterprises modernizing legacy systems or building a cloud and data platform, with a budget above 50,000 USD.
Verdict. Grape Up is profitable but hard to verify from outside, so ask for named references in your industry before you sign. For a startup MVP it is too big.
Pros
Grape Up reported a profit of 27.1M PLN on 92.3M PLN of revenue in 2025.
Polish funds and the founders' family foundations own the company. Headquarters are in Kraków, with a Wrocław development center.
Grape Up runs its own platforms for legacy modernization and data sharing, such as G.Tx and Databoostr.
Clutch shows a 5.0 rating.
Cons
Clutch shows only 6 reviews, and only one of 25 case studies names the client. Logos such as Porsche come without described work.
GoWork employee reviews are negative (5 positive, 17 negative), with 8 mentions of layoffs, though the latest review is from 2024.
The job boards show very few open roles.
From their website and Clutch profile
Headquarters are in Kraków, and Wrocław is one of two Polish development centers. Grape Up has a Wrocław presence but is not a Wrocław company (source).
24 of 25 case studies are anonymized by sector, and Cummins is the only named client. The homepage logo wall shows image files without text names (source).
The about page claims over 20 years of operation but gives no year. The Polish KRS entry is from 2014, and Clutch lists 2006 (source).
The site shows no ISO or cloud partner certifications, although Grape Up sells sovereign cloud and AI governance products (source).
Clutch shows 5.0 from 6 reviews, a $50,000 minimum project, $50 to $99 per hour and 50 to 249 employees (source).
Best for: Broadcasters and streaming services that need OTT, connected-TV and video apps, with named references at major European channels.
Verdict. For a TV channel or a streaming service, it is the only Wrocław agency with named broadcaster references. For any other product, pick from the rest of the top 10.
Pros
Named case studies with large broadcasters such as ITV and CANAL+, which is rare for a Wrocław agency.
4.9 on Clutch from 30 reviews, revenue of 40M PLN with a profit of 4.5M PLN in the 2024 filing.
Part of Spyrosoft S.A., a listed Polish group, with offices in Bergen, Copenhagen and Gothenburg for Nordic clients.
Cons
Narrow focus: the whole offer is video and OTT. For a non-media product you are the wrong client.
Employee reviews are negative (2 positive, 5 negative) and no open roles on the boards at the last snapshot.
Headcount figures on the site contradict each other; the latest filing we have is for 2024, not 2025.
From their website and Clutch profile
Case studies name broadcasters such as Nordisk Film+, TV 2, ITV and CANAL+, which few Wrocław agencies can show (source).
The whole site is about OTT and video apps, so the firm suits media clients more than general software projects (source).
Headcount figures are inconsistent, with 200+ video specialists on the homepage, over 1,900 group employees on the about page and a '+1900K' typo in the stats block (source).
The site lists no ISO or partner tier certifications. The partners page names only technology vendors (Wowza, Brightcove, Mux, Axinom) (source).
Clutch shows 4.9 from 30 reviews, $50 to $99 per hour and a $25,000 minimum project. Its founding year of 2010 predates the 2016 KRS entry (source).
White-label OTT platformOTT managed servicesCustom video app development (Roku, Smart TV, Vega OS, HbbTV)Connected TV app developmentPOIS ad control for streamingAI solutions for mediaReactNode.js.NETPython
Homepage of bsgroup.eu, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Spyrosoft BSG.
4
CSHARK
Software and digital transformation partner for fintech, regtech and industrial clients, with a Singapore office for Asian banks.
Best for: Fintech, regtech and industrial clients with a budget above 50,000 USD who want a mid-size Polish company with ISO 27001 and cloud partnerships.
Verdict. A mid-size house for regulated industries, with ISO 27001 to show for it. Come with a budget above 50,000 USD and a compliance checklist, not a two-month MVP.
Pros
Revenue of 80.9M PLN with a profit of 5.2M PLN in 2025, and four private individuals as owners (KRS).
ISO 27001, AWS and Microsoft partnerships, and a clear focus on two sectors instead of “everything for everyone”.
4.9 on Clutch from 19 reviews; the Fenergo work appears in two separate case studies.
Hiring on the job boards and a Singapore office for Asian banking clients.
Cons
Logos of global banks on the homepage without case studies: treat them as unverified.
Minimum project of 50,000 USD, among the highest in the city; not for an MVP.
Headcount is not stated on the site; Clutch says 250 to 999, employee reviews are few and mixed (7 positive, 6 negative).
From their website and Clutch profile
CSHARK focuses on two sectors, fintech/regtech and industrial, and Fenergo appears in two separate case studies (source).
CSHARK is the only firm in the set with an Asian office, CSHARK Singapore Pte. Ltd on Robinson Road (source).
The homepage shows logos of Citibank, Allianz, BNP Paribas and Vodafone, but none of them has a case study, so treat them as unverified (source).
The site states no headcount, while Clutch lists 250 to 999 employees and a USD 50k minimum project (source).
Best for: A SaaS team that needs a diagram editor, workflow builder or graph view inside its product, in Angular or React.
Verdict. Synergy Codes fits a product where the diagram or workflow editor is the core feature. Look elsewhere for a general web app with no visual editor.
Pros
Works in one niche, with GoJS partner status and its own ngDiagram library for Angular.
Named clients include Siemens, BMW, Canon and AMBOSS.
Clutch shows 4.9 from 15 reviews, with projects from 5,000 USD.
Has built visual interfaces for complex logic since 2011.
Cons
The site names Synergia Pro Sp. z o.o. as its legal entity, so check which company signs the contract.
Clutch rates sit at 100–149 USD per hour, high for a Polish shop.
GoWork shows 6 negative entries against 2 positive ones.
From their website and Clutch profile
The about page names Synergia Pro Sp. z o.o. as the legal entity behind the Synergy Codes brand. (source)
The about page claims 60+ in-house staff and 200+ production systems shipped since 2011. (source)
The about page says the company holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification. (source)
The company released its ngDiagram library for Angular as open source under Apache 2.0 in 2024. (source)
Diagram and graph editor developmentWorkflow builder developmentData visualization toolsProduct discovery and UX/UI designAI features for diagramsUX, performance and code auditsTypeScriptReactAIMachine learning
Homepage of www.synergycodes.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Synergy Codes.
7
Hued.me
Wrocław IT lab started by members of a university science club, building .NET, React and Next.js apps.
Clutch: 4.9 (5 reviews)Rate: n/aMin. project: n/a
Best for: Automotive and logistics firms on the Microsoft stack that want a .NET and Next.js app from a small Wrocław team.
Verdict. Consider Hued.me for a Microsoft-stack app in automotive or logistics after a reference call. Skip it if you need published case studies first.
Pros
Profitable in 2025, with 410K PLN of profit on 2.5M PLN of revenue.
Clutch shows 4.9 from 5 reviews.
The stack page names Azure, .NET, Next.js and SharePoint, a fit for Microsoft-based companies.
Cons
The site shows no case studies or named clients to check.
The company was registered in 2024, so its own track record is short.
Clutch gives no hourly rate or minimum project size.
From their website and Clutch profile
The services page lists automotive first among main industries and Next.js in its verified stack. (source)
The site shows no case studies and no client names. (source)
The about page traces the founders to EKA.NET, a science club at Wrocław University of Science and Technology. (source)
The impressum gives HUED.ME sp. z o.o., KRS 0001106443, and a three-person management board. (source)
Custom applicationsWeb developmentIoT and embeddedML and AISharePoint and Microsoft 365UX/UI and graphic design.NETAI
Homepage of hued.me, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Hued.me.
8
Software Mind
Large Kraków-based engineering services company building software, cloud and AI systems for telecom, finance and media clients.
Best for: Telecom, finance and media enterprises that need a large, certified multi-role team for a long program.
Verdict. Pick Software Mind for telecom, finance or media programs that need many roles and certifications. For an MVP or a single small app, it is too big.
Pros
Software Mind is the largest company in this group, with 254.9M PLN of revenue and 7.9M PLN of profit in 2025.
Clutch shows 58 reviews averaging 4.9.
The site declares ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 27001.
Software Mind has Polish offices in Kraków, Warsaw, Rzeszów and Wrocław, plus nearshore centers abroad.
Cons
GoWork opinions lean negative, with 4 positive against 17 negative and 5 mentions of layoffs.
Private equity firm Enterprise Investors has backed the company since 2020, which favors growth targets and larger accounts.
A small product will be a small account here.
From their website and Clutch profile
Software Mind was founded in 1999 in Kraków as Websoft. Private equity firm Enterprise Investors invested EUR 25 million in 2020 (source).
The site claims 1600+ experts and ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 27001 certification (source).
Polish offices are in Kraków, Warsaw, Rzeszów and Wrocław. The contact page also lists the US, Germany, Romania, Moldova and Latin America (source).
The legal entity is Software Mind S.A. with KRS 0001180898, which explains the recent registry date in our file (source).
Custom software developmentAI-accelerated SDLCCloud and data engineeringDedicated teams and nearshoringEmbedded softwareSecurity and QAReactAngularJavaAWS
Homepage of softwaremind.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Software Mind.
9
DataRiseLab
Wrocław data consultancy building Power BI, Microsoft Fabric and Azure data platforms for restaurant chains and finance.
Data warehouses and integrationPower BI reportingAzure cloud migrationMachine learning and generative AICairn for Fabric legacy migrationEmbedded data and AI specialistsAzureAIData engineering
Homepage of www.datariselab.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to DataRiseLab.
10
Angry Nerds
Wrocław software house building web, mobile, IoT and Azure apps, with offices in Atlanta and Toronto.
Best for: Startups and fintechs that need a mobile or .NET web app with product design from one team.
Verdict. Pick Angry Nerds for a startup app with design and mobile in one team. Before signing, ask which legal entity bills you and check its current financials.
Pros
Clutch shows 4.9 from 22 reviews.
The about page reports 545 projects since 2015.
Cases include Northmill, a Swedish neobank, and NeoTaste, a German startup.
Offices in Atlanta and Toronto give US and Canadian clients a local contact.
Cons
KRS shows 266K PLN revenue and a 146K PLN loss for 2023, far below what 100+ people would bill.
GoWork has 28 negative entries out of 39 real ones.
Staff augmentation and offshoring sit in the same menu as custom builds.
From their website and Clutch profile
The site lists Legnicka 16 in Wrocław, matching KRS, plus offices in Atlanta and Toronto. (source)
The about page dates the founding to August 2015 and reports 100+ team members and 545 projects. (source)
Case studies include a website for the Swedish neobank Northmill and an app for the German startup NeoTaste. (source)
The service menu lists nearshoring, offshoring and staff augmentation next to custom development. (source)
Web development (.NET, PHP, Umbraco)Mobile developmentCustom development and IoTProduct design and UX/UIIT outsourcing and staff augmentationCloud and SaaS on Azure and AWSIoTJavaScriptAzure
Homepage of angrynerds.co, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Angry Nerds.
Every company we checked
The table below has the 65 companies with Azure evidence in Wrocław, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.
All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.
Who is not in the top 10, and why
Body leasing, product companies and other services
Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.
N-iX · Kraków
Codewave
Scalo
Emerline · Warsaw
Coherent Solutions
EffectiveSoft · Warsaw
Siili Solutions
Techstack company
Sii Poland · Warsaw
Vazco
FINGO (Regnology Software Poland)
Alphamoon
+ 3 more in the full table
Website not confirmed
The website could not be tied to the registered company. Without that I cannot tell whose filing and reviews I am reading, so the company is not ranked.
Gentle Code
No financial statement
The Financial Documents Repository holds no full-year statement for this company (a new company or no filings). Without revenue and a result I cannot compare stability, so the company is not ranked.
Altimi
Ranked 11th and below
They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.
Ulan Software
Vality
JetSoftPro
Kellton · PERYDOT
Stratoflow
Genuitek
Sanddev
Devqube
Sagiton
DO OK
Lember
A4BEE
+ 7 more in the full table
Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders
Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.
Awakast
NeuralSpike
GREENLOGIC
Altimi
e-direct
Nexio Management
Tratif
Transition Technologies PSC (Wrocław)
Weak evidence for Azure
They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.
LeverX
Thaumatec
Univio
Xebia
Clever Grapes
Kiwee Software
Cody Solutions
Spyrosoft Group
Virtual Nomad · n/d
SysGears
FOTC
Qulix
What they charge
On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.
For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.
25-49 USD/h11
50-99 USD/h45
100-149 USD/h2
150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 58 companies with an office in the city.
Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes
Azure projects often come with Microsoft 365 and Entra ID, so ask about identity and permissions first. Check whether the firm also resells licenses, which changes its incentives.
Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.
Get offers from the best-fit agencies
Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours
Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.
How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 30, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.
Questions
What are the best Azure software houses in Wrocław in 2027?
By the score on this page: 1. Zaven (91), 2. Grape Up (88), 3. Spyrosoft BSG (86), 4. CSHARK (86), 5. Rite NRG (86). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.
How much do Azure agencies in Wrocław charge?
Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.
How do you know a company does Azure?
From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.
Did any company pay to be on this list?
No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.
Can I get my company added or corrected?
Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.
The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.
Disclosures
Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.
Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.
“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation
Confidential by default. NDA is standard. I never show your project, name or screenshots without written consent, which is why this site names no clients without permission.
Your code, your accounts. Code and data stay in your repository and accounts. AI tools run with training on your data turned off, and secrets never reach a model.
A handover you can use. Every project ends with the same checklist: a README that gets it running, one architecture diagram, written decisions, CI, a runbook and a recorded walkthrough. It is done when someone outside the project can run it from the docs.
Boring technology where it counts. I pick a stack you can hire for. Anything experimental needs your yes and an exit plan.
Approach matched to your risk appetite. Prototype, product or regulated: the level decides how much autonomy the agents get and how much review and validation each change needs.
Everything checkable. Every number on my pages links to its source. My tools are free, and the idea validator skill is open source (MIT).
My pledge
Reply within 24 hours. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally, not a bot. Weekend messages: by Monday noon.
Late means free. If I am late, the first hour of work is free. You do not have to ask.
Scope in writing within 24 hours. A free 30-minute call with no company deck, then the scope and the price in writing within 24 hours. You decide.
The person who does the work. You talk to the person who does the work. No sales layer, no handoff.
Follow-up only with news. I follow up only when I have something new for you. Never a "did you see my offer".
Honest "not a fit". If I am not the right person, I say so on the call and point you to someone who is.
Zaven
