I checked 71 companies with an office in Kraków that show Azure work in at least one source (66 by their Clutch profile, 9 by their open roles on JustJoin.it, 1 by my Wrocław catalog) against the court register, their latest filing and their employee reviews. 25 meet the ranking criteria, and the 10 highest scores are below. If one senior engineer is enough, I build DevOps and cloud setups with AI agents.
In short: The highest-scoring Azure software houses in Kraków for 2027 are Grape Up (score 88), Rite NRG (score 86) and SKM Group (score 81). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.
Grape UpAutomotive, finance and aviation enterprises modernizing legacy systems or building a cloud and data platform, with a budget above 50,000 USD. Azure is 50% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 88, 5.0 on Clutch from 6 reviews, profit in 2025.
Rite NRGScale-ups that must staff an engineering team quickly or ship a fixed-scope AI release. Azure is 60% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 86, 4.9 on Clutch from 16 reviews, profit in 2024.
SKM GroupManufacturers and distributors with an aging .NET system or a Plentymarkets shop that needs ERP integration. Azure is 75% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 81, 4.9 on Clutch from 9 reviews, profit in 2025.
Software MindTelecom, finance and media enterprises that need a large, certified multi-role team for a long program. Azure is 40% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 78, 4.9 on Clutch from 58 reviews, profit in 2025.
One senior instead of a teamIf the project fits one person with coding agents, hire me for DevOps and cloud setups before you pay an agency margin.
The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows Azure work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.
The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how deep the company goes into Azure (its share of the Clutch profile and of open roles) and weighs 35% instead of 15%, so specialists rank above large generalists. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.
Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.
1
Grape Up
Enterprise cloud, legacy modernization, data platforms and AI engineering for automotive, finance, manufacturing and aviation companies.
Best for: Automotive, finance and aviation enterprises modernizing legacy systems or building a cloud and data platform, with a budget above 50,000 USD.
Verdict. Grape Up is profitable but hard to verify from outside, so ask for named references in your industry before you sign. For a startup MVP it is too big.
Pros
Grape Up reported a profit of 27.1M PLN on 92.3M PLN of revenue in 2025.
Polish funds and the founders' family foundations own the company. Headquarters are in Kraków, with a Wrocław development center.
Grape Up runs its own platforms for legacy modernization and data sharing, such as G.Tx and Databoostr.
Clutch shows a 5.0 rating.
Cons
Clutch shows only 6 reviews, and only one of 25 case studies names the client. Logos such as Porsche come without described work.
GoWork employee reviews are negative (5 positive, 17 negative), with 8 mentions of layoffs, though the latest review is from 2024.
The job boards show very few open roles.
From their website and Clutch profile
Headquarters are in Kraków, and Wrocław is one of two Polish development centers. Grape Up has a Wrocław presence but is not a Wrocław company (source).
24 of 25 case studies are anonymized by sector, and Cummins is the only named client. The homepage logo wall shows image files without text names (source).
The about page claims over 20 years of operation but gives no year. The Polish KRS entry is from 2014, and Clutch lists 2006 (source).
The site shows no ISO or cloud partner certifications, although Grape Up sells sovereign cloud and AI governance products (source).
Clutch shows 5.0 from 6 reviews, a $50,000 minimum project, $50 to $99 per hour and 50 to 249 employees (source).
Best for: Telecom, finance and media enterprises that need a large, certified multi-role team for a long program.
Verdict. Pick Software Mind for telecom, finance or media programs that need many roles and certifications. For an MVP or a single small app, it is too big.
Pros
Software Mind is the largest company in this group, with 254.9M PLN of revenue and 7.9M PLN of profit in 2025.
Clutch shows 58 reviews averaging 4.9.
The site declares ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 27001.
Software Mind has Polish offices in Kraków, Warsaw, Rzeszów and Wrocław, plus nearshore centers abroad.
Cons
GoWork opinions lean negative, with 4 positive against 17 negative and 5 mentions of layoffs.
Private equity firm Enterprise Investors has backed the company since 2020, which favors growth targets and larger accounts.
A small product will be a small account here.
From their website and Clutch profile
Software Mind was founded in 1999 in Kraków as Websoft. Private equity firm Enterprise Investors invested EUR 25 million in 2020 (source).
The site claims 1600+ experts and ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 27001 certification (source).
Polish offices are in Kraków, Warsaw, Rzeszów and Wrocław. The contact page also lists the US, Germany, Romania, Moldova and Latin America (source).
The legal entity is Software Mind S.A. with KRS 0001180898, which explains the recent registry date in our file (source).
Custom software developmentAI-accelerated SDLCCloud and data engineeringDedicated teams and nearshoringEmbedded softwareSecurity and QAReactAngularJavaAWS
Homepage of softwaremind.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Software Mind.
5
Intetics
US software outsourcing group founded in 1995, with a Kraków company owned by Intetics Inc.
Best for: A healthcare or fintech company that wants an outsourced team backed by ISO 27001 and ISO 9001.
Verdict. Intetics fits a regulated company that needs certified processes and a large bench. Skip it for a small startup MVP with a 50,000 USD ceiling.
Pros
Holds ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 42001 for AI management.
Has run since 1995 and claims 500+ people across branch offices in 7 countries.
Profitable in 2025, with 1.1M PLN of profit on 25.7M PLN of revenue.
Clutch shows 4.8 from 30 reviews.
Cons
Leans on staffing, and Clutch puts staff augmentation and managed services at 20% each.
Case studies sit behind a registration form, so references take a sales call.
The site names no Polish office, so ask who in Kraków will do the work.
From their website and Clutch profile
The locations page claims 500+ people, branch offices in 7 countries and 400+ clients since 1995. (source)
The certifications page lists ISO/IEC 42001, ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001. (source)
The case studies page hides its list behind a registration form. (source)
The site names no Polish office, though KRS places the Polish company in Kraków. (source)
Custom software developmentRemote in-sourcing (dedicated teams)AI and ML solutionsSoftware product assessment (TETRA)Cloud and DevOpsQA and test automationAI
Homepage of intetics.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Intetics.
6
Intellias
Ukrainian-founded product engineering company with a Kraków entity, working on mobility, navigation, fintech and retail platforms.
Best for: Automotive, navigation and fintech companies that need a large engineering team with domain experience and a budget above 50,000 USD.
Verdict. Pick Intellias for mobility and fintech engineering, where HERE and TomTom are checkable references. The Polish entity delivers for a foreign group, so agree in writing who leads your project.
Pros
The Kraków company reported 152.3M PLN of revenue and a profit of 8.4M PLN in its 2025 filing.
The site names domain clients such as HERE, TomTom and HelloFresh.
Clutch shows 4.9 from 30 reviews, and Intellias has held ISO 27001 since 2017.
Its open roles on the job boards are remote.
Cons
The Polish company belongs to Iteality Limited, and the group was founded in Ukraine in 2002.
Employee reviews are negative on balance (26 positive, 28 negative), with 4 mentions of layoffs.
Three of the four Polish offices are coworking spaces, and the open roles are remote.
From their website and Clutch profile
Intellias was founded in 2002. The about page says its first office outside Ukraine opened in Zurich in 2010 and does not mention Poland (source).
The site lists four Polish offices in Kraków, Warsaw, Łódź and Wrocław, and the last three are in coworking spaces (source).
Named clients include HERE, TomTom, HelloFresh and Zooplus (source).
Best for: Manufacturers and hardware startups that need electronics, firmware and an app designed together.
Verdict. Take AMC TECH when your product has a circuit board or a sensor. For a pure web or SaaS product, pick a software house.
Pros
AMC TECH builds hardware, firmware and software under one roof.
Clutch shows 17 reviews with a perfect average, from industrial clients such as Solaris and Analog Devices.
The homepage names industrial brands such as Bosch, Siemens, Alstom Power and Pesa.
AMC TECH declares an ISO 9001 quality system.
Cons
AMC TECH reported a profit of only 27K PLN on 11.5M PLN of revenue in 2025.
The registry company dates from 2015, while Clutch says 1992, so part of the history belongs to earlier entities.
GoWork has few employee opinions, the latest from 2023.
From their website and Clutch profile
AMC TECH combines electronics, mechanics and software. Sister brands AMC Vibro and AMC Works handle machine monitoring and assembly (source).
The about page claims 20+ years, 100+ engineers, 150+ clients and an ISO 9001 quality system (source).
The foreign contacts in Denmark, the US, Switzerland and the UK are partner firms. The company itself sits at Pilotów 2E in Kraków (source).
Clutch gives 1992 as the founding year and lists 17 reviews, including Solaris and Analog Devices. The registry entity in our file dates from 2015 (source).
Embedded and application softwareElectronics designIndustrial design and mechanicsProduction line designIoT and Industry 4.0Technology partnership for startups
Best for: US and EU companies that want AWS migration or DevOps work from a nearshore team with ISO certificates.
Verdict. Pick Agiliway for cloud migration or DevOps when a certified, distributed team suits you. Ask which country your engineers work from before signing.
Pros
Holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 certificates, per its site.
Lists AWS Well-Architected Reviews and cloud cost work under DevOps.
Clutch shows 4.6 from 19 reviews.
Cons
The Polish company is small, with 2.1M PLN of revenue and 98K PLN of profit in 2025.
Kraków is one of five locations, so check where your team will sit.
Clutch lists a minimum project of $50,000.
From their website and Clutch profile
The contact page lists the Kraków office at 7 Wadowicka Street, matching KRS (source).
The company page claims 200+ team members, 160+ projects and 50+ active clients (source).
The home page lists AWS migration, cloud optimization and Well-Architected Reviews under Cloud and DevOps (source).
The company page shows ISO 9001, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 certificates (source).
Best for: A US or EU company that wants a custom business app or SaaS from a larger team by a set date.
Verdict. Syberry fits a company that wants a managed team with written guarantees and a US contract partner. Skip it for a small MVP or a short engagement.
Pros
Clutch shows 5.0 from 13 reviews and a Verified badge.
Publishes engagement terms, with fixed-scope projects up to 500,000 USD.
Promises money back if agreed criteria are missed in the first 30 days.
Revenue reached 11M PLN in 2025, and the group claims more than 250 engineers.
Cons
The Kraków company belongs to the US Syberry Corporation, headquartered in Austin.
Dedicated teams need a 1-year minimum, with 300,000 USD as the benchmark spend.
Reported a small loss of 77K PLN in 2025.
From their website and Clutch profile
The contact page lists offices in Austin, Kraków and Minsk. (source)
The about page claims more than 250 software experts and more than 150 success stories. (source)
The pricing page caps fixed-scope projects at 500,000 USD and gives 300,000 USD as the benchmark for a dedicated team. (source)
The pricing page promises money back if agreed success criteria are missed in the first 30 days. (source)
Custom software and SaaS developmentMobile appsCloud and DevOpsAI and ML developmentLegacy modernization and maintenanceQA and testingAI
Homepage of www.syberry.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Syberry.
Every company we checked
The table below has the 71 companies with Azure evidence in Kraków, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.
All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.
Who is not in the top 10, and why
Paid placements and “serves the city” without an office
On the Clutch city list the first positions are bought with ads (links through ppc.clutch.co) or a “serves” entry. These companies have no office in the city according to KRS or their own site, so they are not ranked here.
Cleveroad (paid)
Body leasing, product companies and other services
Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.
N-iX
Sii Poland · Warsaw
Website not confirmed
The website could not be tied to the registered company. Without that I cannot tell whose filing and reviews I am reading, so the company is not ranked.
Clover Dynamics
Ranked 11th and below
They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.
Gecko Dynamics
Implex
Glorium Technologies
Rumble Fish
Codya
DBB Software
korg.software
Montrose Software
Ailleron
Ultimate Systems
Codibly
Software Mansion
+ 3 more in the full table
Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders
Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.
EBIS
Engipulse
Infolet
JSON Crew
Weak evidence for Azure
They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.
From Poland with Dev
unicrew
Sombra
UKAD
Altkom Software
Uptime Poland
The APP Solutions
Lemberg Solutions
Svitla Systems
CrustLab
Smart Mobile House
Eastoner
+ 26 more in the full table
What they charge
On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.
For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.
25-49 USD/h24
50-99 USD/h42
100-149 USD/h1
150-199 USD/h1
Rates declared on Clutch, 68 companies with an office in the city.
Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes
Azure projects often come with Microsoft 365 and Entra ID, so ask about identity and permissions first. Check whether the firm also resells licenses, which changes its incentives.
Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.
Get offers from the best-fit agencies
Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours
Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.
How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 30, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.
Questions
What are the best Azure software houses in Kraków in 2027?
By the score on this page: 1. Grape Up (88), 2. Rite NRG (86), 3. SKM Group (81), 4. Software Mind (78), 5. Intetics (77). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.
How much do Azure agencies in Kraków charge?
Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.
How do you know a company does Azure?
From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.
Did any company pay to be on this list?
No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.
Can I get my company added or corrected?
Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.
The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.
Disclosures
Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.
Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.
“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation
Confidential by default. NDA is standard. I never show your project, name or screenshots without written consent, which is why this site names no clients without permission.
Your code, your accounts. Code and data stay in your repository and accounts. AI tools run with training on your data turned off, and secrets never reach a model.
A handover you can use. Every project ends with the same checklist: a README that gets it running, one architecture diagram, written decisions, CI, a runbook and a recorded walkthrough. It is done when someone outside the project can run it from the docs.
Boring technology where it counts. I pick a stack you can hire for. Anything experimental needs your yes and an exit plan.
Approach matched to your risk appetite. Prototype, product or regulated: the level decides how much autonomy the agents get and how much review and validation each change needs.
Everything checkable. Every number on my pages links to its source. My tools are free, and the idea validator skill is open source (MIT).
My pledge
Reply within 24 hours. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally, not a bot. Weekend messages: by Monday noon.
Late means free. If I am late, the first hour of work is free. You do not have to ask.
Scope in writing within 24 hours. A free 30-minute call with no company deck, then the scope and the price in writing within 24 hours. You decide.
The person who does the work. You talk to the person who does the work. No sales layer, no handoff.
Follow-up only with news. I follow up only when I have something new for you. Never a "did you see my offer".
Honest "not a fit". If I am not the right person, I say so on the call and point you to someone who is.
Grape Up
