ciunkos.com Rankings

Voice AI in Poland, ranked for 2027

Best voice AI and speech development companies in Poland

  1. 1 Modsen 83
  2. 2 Oxagile 82
  3. 3 Freeport Metrics 82

142 companies with evidence of voice AI work in Poland; 46 meet the ranking criteria. Sources: 140 by their Clutch profile, 1 by their open roles on JustJoin.it, 4 by their own website, KRS records, available financial statements and employee reviews. If one senior engineer is enough, I build AI features with AI agents.

Get matched offers in 24 hours See the top 10 Download the data (CSV)

  • 142 company records
  • 67 with KRS records
  • 64 with a financial statement
  • 65 with an employee review profile
  • 3 service-area listings

Find your fit

Compare companies

#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Modsen profit 890K PLN (2025)
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 725–49 USD/hvoice AI 55% AWS83
2
Oxagile profit 135K PLN (2025)
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 17n/avoice AI 70% AWS82
3
Freeport Metrics profit 126K PLN (2025) GoWork 0/11
Warsaw10-494.8 · 1550–99 USD/hvoice AI 55% Java82
4
iMakeable profit 21K PLN (2025)
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1650–99 USD/hvoice AI 45% AWS78
5
Plavno loss 15K PLN (2025)
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 5625–49 USD/hvoice AI 100% AWS75
6
byVoice profit 241K PLN (2025)
Kraków10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/hvoice AI 35% PHP and Laravel75
7
Apptension loss 315K PLN (2025) GoWork 6/15
Poznań50-2494.8 · 2250–99 USD/hvoice AI 65% AWS72
8
Innowise profit 3M PLN (2025) GoWork 65/10
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/hvoice AI 20% AWS70
9
WEBSENSA profit 5K PLN (2025)
Warsaw10-494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hvoice AI Python70
10
Andersen profit 363K PLN (2025)
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 12950–99 USD/hvoice AI 15% Salesforce69

The ranking

Modsen

83/100

Clutch: 4.9 (7 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and specialization. Weakest axis: activity (2.0/5).

Pros

  • Net profit of 890,200 PLN in 2025 on 12,200,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 7 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000898497. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • The Clutch snapshot contains 7 reviews; request references for a comparable project. (2026-10-28 · source)

Discrepancy: Clutch: 250+ people, but the Polish entity had 12.2M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Projects & technologies
AI
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
1 shareholder (individual)
Revenue
12.2M PLN (2025)
Profit
890K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
250-999
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (2/0)
Discrepancy
Clutch: 250+ people, but the Polish entity had 12.2M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Score: 83/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.0/5 Stability 4.3/5 Specialization 5.0/5 Activity 2.0/5

Website Clutch KRS GoWork

Sources (5) · Checked October 28, 2026

Oxagile

New York software company with a Warsaw development center, working on video streaming, AdTech, EdTech and AI.

82/100

Clutch: 4.9 (17 reviews) Rate: n/a Min. project: n/a

Best for: Media and streaming companies that need OTT apps, smart TV players or AdTech platforms.

Verdict. Go with Oxagile for a streaming or AdTech product that needs specialists across many TV platforms. For a Polish contract with a local team, confirm who works from Warsaw.

Pros

  • Net profit of 134,700 PLN in 2025 on 2,100,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 17 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Certifications listed by the company: ISO/IEC 27001, Microsoft Partner. (2026-10-28 · source)

Discrepancy: company website: 300+ people, but the Polish entity had 2.1M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The contact page lists the head office at 165 Broadway in New York and a Warsaw Development Center at Domaniewska 17/19. (source)
  • The company page says Oxagile started in 2005 and lists 20+ years in engineering and 300+ professionals. (source)
  • The homepage claims 350+ clients and shows logos of Discovery, Kaltura and Vodafone. (source)
  • The site shows an ISO/IEC 27001 badge and a Clutch Champion Fall 2024 badge. (source)

Clients they name: Discovery, Kaltura, Vodafone, Thomson Reuters, Panasonic Connect, Roche

Custom software development AI and generative AI development Video streaming and OTT AdTech platforms Dedicated teams and outsourcing QA and DevOps
Oxagile homepage
Homepage of www.oxagile.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Oxagile.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
60K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
2.1M PLN (2025)
Profit
135K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
250-999
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)
Discrepancy
company website: 300+ people, but the Polish entity had 2.1M PLN revenue (2025); the team most likely sits in another entity

Score: 82/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.4/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 5.0/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (10) · Checked October 28, 2026

Freeport Metrics

American-owned software firm with a Warsaw team, now focused on generative AI for US clients.

82/100

Clutch: 4.8 (15 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Nonprofits and publicly funded US health programs that want a small team to add generative AI to existing software.

Verdict. Choose Freeport Metrics for an AI feature in a US-facing product built by a small team. For Polish public tenders look elsewhere, since its government work is all in the US.

Pros

Cons

  • GoWork records 0 positive and 11 negative reviews. These are user opinions, not independently established events. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page says Andrew Gauvin co-founded the company in 2009 and has been sole owner since 2018 (source).
  • The home page claims 125 projects completed on time and on budget over 15 years (source).
  • The portfolio tags four US projects as government work, including a subsidy system for US medical facilities (source).
  • The about page says the company avoids body leasing and prefers teams with clear goals (source).

Clients they name: Smile Train, Bangor Savings Bank, Community Health Options, Animal Ethics, VoyceMe, Keepler, EVO Payments

Generative AI integration AI voice agents and document processing Rapid prototyping Custom web and mobile development Product design
Freeport Metrics homepage
Homepage of www.freeportmetrics.com/#, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Freeport Metrics.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2010
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
76K PLN
Owners
Freeport Metrics, Inc.
Revenue
5.3M PLN (2025)
Profit
126K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
negative (0/11)

Score: 82/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.1/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 5.0/5 Activity 2.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

iMakeable

Wrocław software house building web and mobile apps, AI tools and process automation for startups and SMEs.

78/100

Clutch: 5.0 (16 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Verified

Best for: Startups and SMEs in education or real estate that need a Next.js web app or process automation, delivered quickly.

Verdict. Pick iMakeable for a Next.js MVP or process automation at a small company. For a large multi-team build, look for a bigger bench.

Pros

  • Net profit of 21,084 PLN in 2025 on 1,914,297 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 16 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000929222. (2026-09-22 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page claims close to a hundred projects in EdTech, real estate, LegalTech, iGaming and GIS. (source)
  • The home page says over 80% of past clients still work with the company. (source)
  • The site promises first results within 3 months of the project start. (source)
  • The about page shows 10 team members by name, led by CEO Maks Konarski. (source)

Clients they name: RynekPierwotny.pl, GISPartner, StatXplorer, EcoMS, RKKVC, e-dermatolog.pl, Poznajdealera.pl, Briefly, LegalSpot

Web and mobile app development MVP development AI development Process automation IT and startup consulting QA and testing React Next.js Node.js Vue
iMakeable homepage
Homepage of imakeable.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to iMakeable.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Wrocław
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
1.9M PLN (2025)
Profit
21K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Employees (LinkedIn)
11-50, 414 followers (September 16, 2026)
Open roles
0 (October 29, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 78/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.7/5 Stability 3.3/5 Specialization 4.5/5 Activity 2.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (16) · Checked October 29, 2026

Plavno

75/100

Clutch: 4.9 (56 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD Verified

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and specialization. Weakest axis: activity (1.5/5).

Pros

  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 56 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0001009033. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • Net loss of 15,300 PLN in 2025 on 4,300,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies
AI
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2022
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
4.3M PLN (2025)
Loss
15K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 75/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.7/5 Stability 1.8/5 Specialization 5.0/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Clutch KRS GoWork

Sources (5) · Checked October 28, 2026

byVoice

Kraków company selling an AI voice agent platform for inbound and outbound calls, plus custom agent builds.

75/100

Clutch: 5.0 (13 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Small service firms that want an AI phone agent answering calls, set up by the vendor.

Verdict. Pick byVoice for an AI phone agent on top of your existing telephony. Skip it for general product development.

Pros

  • Net profit of 241,100 PLN in 2025 on 5,200,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 13 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000916645. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The site sells AI voice agents that answer and place calls, with plans from $29 a month (source)
  • The site names no client companies, and its testimonials give only personal names and job titles (source)
  • The footer shows ByVoice Sp. z o.o., KRS 0000916645, at ul. Zamknięta 10 in Kraków, matching the registry (source)
  • The about page does not mention C++, embedded work or media clients (source)
AI voice agents Conversational IVR Telephony integration and routing Voice AI consulting API integrations White-label platform AI
byVoice homepage
Homepage of www.byvoice.io, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to byVoice.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Kraków
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
10K PLN
Owners
3 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
5.2M PLN (2025)
Profit
241K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 75/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.5/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 4.0/5 Activity 1.5/5

Website Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (10) · Checked October 28, 2026

Apptension

Poznań software house of senior engineers building AI and SaaS products with an agentic delivery process.

72/100

Clutch: 4.8 (22 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: SaaS founders and product teams that want senior engineers to ship an AI agent or MVP in weeks.

Verdict. Hire Apptension for an AI agent or SaaS MVP when speed matters and you can review pull requests. Check the 2025 loss and the layoff mentions on GoWork before a long contract.

Pros

  • Clutch rating of 4.8/5 from 22 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Published projects: Riyadh Air, Expo Dubai, LESS.
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000534235. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • Net loss of 315,300 PLN in 2025 on 9,600,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • GoWork records 6 positive and 15 negative reviews. These are user opinions, not independently established events. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page says the founders started Apptension in 2012 after winning Poznań Hackfest (source).
  • The NiNi Bot case study claims a production PWA in 11 active days with 159 merged pull requests (source).
  • The Teamdeck modernization took about nine weeks and 60 pull requests, and its production cutover is still pending (source).
  • The stats block on the home page shows placeholder zeros for projects, engineers and CSAT (source).

Clients they name: Riyadh Air, Expo Dubai, LESS, The Grassroots Coach, Miraflora Wagyu, PetProov, Teamdeck

Generative AI solutions PoC and MVP development SaaS development with an open-source boilerplate (9,000+ GitHub stars) Prototype to production Hybrid teams Product consulting AI
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2014
HQ (KRS)
Poznań
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
90K PLN
Owners
3 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
9.6M PLN (2025)
Loss
315K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
negative (6/15)

Score: 72/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.3/5 Stability 1.3/5 Specialization 5.0/5 Activity 2.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (10) · Checked October 28, 2026

Innowise

Very large outsourcing and staff augmentation company with a Warsaw headquarters claim and a catalog covering almost every technology.

70/100

Clutch: 4.9 (73 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Teams that must add several developers quickly and can manage an outsourced team under their own tech lead.

Verdict. Use Innowise for staff augmentation under your own tech lead when you need CVs fast across many technologies. Skip it when you need a partner whose past work you can verify.

Pros

  • Net profit of 3,000,000 PLN in 2025 on 251,200,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 73 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Certifications listed by the company: ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 13485. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • The offer also includes staff augmentation. Agree who owns project delivery in the contract. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page claims 3,500+ people, 1,600 projects and a founding year of 2007. The Polish company in KRS dates from 2021 (source).
  • The FAQ names Warsaw as headquarters, while the footer gives a registered address in Boston, MA (source).
  • The case studies page names no clients and warns that client details may be generalized or modified (source).
  • Innowise sells staff augmentation openly, promising CVs in 1 to 2 days and a team joining in 3 to 5 days (source).

Clients they name: Hays, Spar, Tietoevry, Topcon, NTT Data, Commercial Bank of Qatar

Custom software development Staff augmentation and dedicated teams Testing and QA Data, AI and ML ERP and CRM Legacy modernization AI
Innowise homepage
Homepage of innowise.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Innowise.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
251.2M PLN (2025)
Profit
3M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
1000-9999
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
positive (65/10)

Score: 70/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.2/5 Stability 5.0/5 Specialization 2.0/5 Activity 2.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

WEBSENSA

Warsaw AI company selling Knowledge Chat, Voicebot AI and custom AI builds, with first results promised in 30 days.

70/100

Clutch: 4.9 (13 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Mid-size firms in manufacturing, finance or law that want a document chatbot or voicebot running within weeks.

Verdict. Pick Websensa for a knowledge chatbot or voicebot built on its ready platform. For a custom system from scratch, choose a firm that sells engineering time first.

Pros

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The contact page lists WEBSENSA Sp. z o.o. at Marszałkowska 76 in Warsaw, KRS 0000378128, matching the register. (source)
  • The About page says the company has worked since 2010 and claims 40+ team members and 50+ AI success stories. (source)
  • Case studies cover a Knowledge Chat for Veolia Energia Polska and Personal Finance Managers for Santander and Getin Bank. (source)
  • The home page leads with packaged AI products and promises first measurable AI impact in 30 days. (source)

Clients they name: Veolia Energia Polska, Santander Bank Polska, Getin Bank, Wirtualna Polska, Polkomtel, WFDiF

Knowledge Chat (document chatbot) Voicebot AI Enterprise AI platform AI workshops Recommendation and ad-tech systems Custom AI builds AI
WEBSENSA homepage
Homepage of www.websensa.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to WEBSENSA.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2011
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
6K PLN
Owners
3 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
9.3M PLN (2025)
Profit
5K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Open roles
0 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 70/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.3/5 Stability 4.3/5 Specialization 3.0/5 Activity 2.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

Andersen

Large international outsourcing company headquartered in Warsaw, selling dedicated teams and full-cycle development in 22 industries.

69/100

Clutch: 4.9 (129 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD Verified

Best for: Companies that need a large dedicated team fast, across many technologies, and can run it with their own product owner.

Verdict. Use Andersen to scale a team you lead, backed by 129 Clutch reviews. Check who signs the contract, given the thin Polish margin and the multi-entity setup.

Pros

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 50,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The offer also includes staff augmentation. Agree who owns project delivery in the contract. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page claims 3,500+ in-house experts, 2,000+ clients, 18 offices and 19 years of experience, with Warsaw as headquarters (source).
  • The footer names other legal entities, UAB Andersen Soft and Andersen Germany GmbH, so the Polish company is one of several (source).
  • Many case studies are under NDA, and the named ones include Deutsche Telekom and Samsung Electronics (source).
  • The site announces the Claude Partner Network and AWS MSP partnership (source).

Clients they name: Samsung Electronics, Deutsche Telekom, BNP Paribas, Verivox, TUI

Custom software development Staff augmentation and dedicated teams AI and data Cloud and DevOps Cybersecurity CRM and ERP AWS Docker Kubernetes Python
Andersen homepage
Homepage of andersenlab.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Andersen.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2019
HQ (KRS)
Warsaw
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
1 shareholder (individual)
Revenue
177.1M PLN (2025)
Profit
363K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
1000-9999
Open roles
22 (October 30, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
no profile (checked October 28, 2026)

Score: 69/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.5/5 Stability 4.5/5 Specialization 1.5/5 Activity 4.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn

Sources (11) · Checked October 30, 2026

All companies

Show all 142 companies
Size: Rate: · 142
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
Modsen voice AI 55% AWS
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 725–49 USD/h12.2M PLN890K PLNvoice AI 55% AWS83Website Clutch KRS
2
Oxagile voice AI 70% AWS
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 17n/a2.1M PLN135K PLNvoice AI 70% AWS82Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
3
Freeport Metrics voice AI 55% Java
Warsaw10-494.8 · 1550–99 USD/h5.3M PLN126K PLNvoice AI 55% Java82Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
4
iMakeable voice AI 45% AWS
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1650–99 USD/h1.9M PLN21K PLNvoice AI 45% AWS78Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
5
Plavno voice AI 100% AWS
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 5625–49 USD/h4.3M PLN-15K PLNvoice AI 100% AWS75Website Clutch KRS
6
byVoice voice AI 35% PHP and Laravel
Kraków10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/h5.2M PLN241K PLNvoice AI 35% PHP and Laravel75Website Clutch KRS
7
Apptension voice AI 65% AWS
Poznań50-2494.8 · 2250–99 USD/h9.6M PLN-315K PLNvoice AI 65% AWS72Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
8
Innowise voice AI 20% AWS
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 7350–99 USD/h251.2M PLN3M PLNvoice AI 20% AWS70Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
9
WEBSENSA voice AI Python
Warsaw10-494.9 · 1350–99 USD/h9.3M PLN5K PLNvoice AI Python70Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
10
Andersen voice AI 15% Salesforce
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 12950–99 USD/h177.1M PLN363K PLNvoice AI 15% Salesforce69Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Clover Dynamics website not confirmed
Kraków50-2495.0 · 2125–49 USD/h111K PLN-4K PLNvoice AI 50% AWS72Website Clutch KRS
–
nomtek based in Wrocław; local office unconfirmed
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 4450–99 USD/h30.7M PLN-69K PLNvoice AI 35% Flutter72Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Scalo body leasing
Wrocław250-9994.7 · 3350–99 USD/h162.2M PLN8.1M PLNvoice AI 30% Java71Website Clutch KRS
–
Techstack company body leasing
Wrocław50-2495.0 · 4750–99 USD/h24.6M PLN1.6M PLNvoice AI 34% AWS71Website Clutch KRS
–
GLOBALDEV too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 11625–49 USD/h2.4M PLN31K PLNvoice AI 20% iOS and Swift69Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
CleverDev Software too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 650–99 USD/h1.2M PLN94K PLNvoice AI 16% AWS68Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Instinctools too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.7 · 3625–49 USD/h14M PLN537K PLNvoice AI 30% AWS68Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Deviniti too little client evidence
Wrocław250-9995.0 · 4650–99 USD/h407.8M PLN30.4M PLNvoice AI 10% Flutter67Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
FREYSOFT too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 850–99 USD/h4.3M PLN158K PLNvoice AI 30% .NET67Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
USEO body leasing
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h4M PLN32K PLNvoice AI 30% Ruby on Rails67Website Clutch KRS
–
Netguru too little client evidence
Poznań250-9994.8 · 7350–99 USD/h127.5M PLN6.3M PLNvoice AI 20% AWS66Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Agiliway too little client evidence
Kraków50-2494.6 · 1950–99 USD/h2.1M PLN98K PLNvoice AI 30% AWS65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
EffectiveSoft body leasing
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 1950–99 USD/h9.4M PLN140K PLNvoice AI 30% Java65Website Clutch KRS
–
Momentum too little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 4550–99 USD/h25.6M PLN1.7M PLNvoice AI 15% Ruby on Rails65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Solvd too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9995.0 · 24100–149 USD/h19.4M PLN1.6M PLNvoice AI 20% AWS65Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Gecko Dynamics too little client evidence
Kraków10-494.9 · 2950–99 USD/h5.7M PLN-272K PLNvoice AI 35% Java64Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Darly Solutions too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3450–99 USD/h5.4M PLN321K PLNvoice AI 20% AWS63Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
deepsense.ai too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 10100–149 USD/h89.7M PLN38.9M PLNvoice AI 20%63Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
TechMagic too little client evidence
Kraków250-9994.8 · 5450–99 USD/h11.5M PLN1.2M PLNvoice AI 20% AWS63Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Siili Solutions body leasing
Wrocław250-9994.9 · 750–99 USD/h37.3M PLN3.4M PLNvoice AI 15% AWS60Website Clutch KRS
–
STX Next too little client evidence
Poznań250-9994.7 · 10350–99 USD/h128.1M PLN9.5M PLNvoice AI 15% Python60Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Akveo based in Warsaw; local office unconfirmed
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3150–99 USD/h11.3M PLN515K PLNvoice AI 10% Azure59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Codewave product company
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/h13.8M PLN3.7M PLNvoice AI 10% AWS59Website Clutch KRS
–
Emerline body leasing
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 2550–99 USD/h2.6M PLN-253K PLNvoice AI 30% Azure59Website Clutch KRS
–
Lember too little client evidence
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1025–49 USD/h137K PLN70K PLNvoice AI 20% iOS and Swift59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Neti too little client evidence
Rzeszów10-495.0 · 1250–99 USD/h5.3M PLN817K PLNvoice AI 10% TypeScript59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
NeuralSpike under 10 people
Wrocław2-95.0 · 1100–149 USD/h1.4M PLN42K PLNvoice AI 25% Python59Website Clutch KRS
–
Vilmate too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/h10.8M PLN43K PLNvoice AI 15% Azure59Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Fively too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 3050–99 USD/h12.5M PLN93K PLNvoice AI 10% AWS58Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Glorium Technologies too little client evidence
Kraków50-2494.8 · 3250–99 USD/h729K PLN-93K PLNvoice AI 30% .NET58Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Civitta too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 2350–99 USD/h14.7M PLN2.3M PLNvoice AI 10% AWS57Website Clutch KRS
–
Relevant Software too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 3250–99 USD/h14.3M PLN608K PLNvoice AI 10% iOS and Swift57Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
TeaCode too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 3850–99 USD/h1.8M PLN391K PLNvoice AI 15% AWS57Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
YarMobile under 10 people
n/a2-94.8 · 850–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 100%57Website Clutch
–
Codya too little client evidence
Kraków10-495.0 · 525–49 USD/h1.5M PLN-401K PLNvoice AI 30% Java56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
DBB Software too little client evidence
Kraków50-2495.0 · 3425–49 USD/h3.6M PLN1.5M PLNvoice AI 10% Magento (Adobe Commerce)56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Euristiq too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.8 · 3850–99 USD/h13.9M PLN96K PLNvoice AI 10% AWS56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Sigma Software Group too little client evidence
n/a1000-99994.8 · 3750–99 USD/h28M PLN909K PLNvoice AI 15% AWS56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
SolveIt too little client evidence
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 5325–49 USD/h6.8M PLN156K PLNvoice AI 10% Flutter56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Stepwise too little client evidence
Warsaw10-494.9 · 2950–99 USD/h800K PLN-355K PLNvoice AI 20% Google Cloud56Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Coherent Solutions body leasing
Wrocław1000-99994.7 · 3050–99 USD/h112.1M PLN4.4M PLNvoice AI 10% AWS55Website Clutch KRS
–
JetSoftPro too little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 4450–99 USD/h5M PLN98K PLNvoice AI 10% iOS and Swift55Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
ImproveIT Solutions body leasing
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 2825–49 USD/h1.3M PLN-88K PLNvoice AI 30% Android54Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Interexy too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 7425–49 USD/h1.2M PLN-16K PLNvoice AI 20% Unity and game development54Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Software Mind too little client evidence
Kraków1000-99994.9 · 5850–99 USD/h254.9M PLN7.9M PLNvoice AI 10% Java54Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Brights based in Warsaw; local office unconfirmed
Warsaw50-2495.0 · 4125–49 USD/h8.3M PLNn/avoice AI 10% Android52Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Leobit office unconfirmed (Clutch “serves”)
n/a50-2495.0 · 6325–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% .NET52Website Clutch
–
JCD.PL too little client evidence
Warsaw10-495.0 · 625–49 USD/h1.9M PLN26K PLNvoice AI 10% iOS and Swift51Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Jellyfish.tech too little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 1325–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 40% AWS51Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Neoteric too little client evidence
Gdańsk50-2495.0 · 7150–99 USD/h9M PLN-1.2M PLNvoice AI 10% TypeScript50Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Tallium office unconfirmed (Clutch “serves”)
Rzeszów50-2495.0 · 4425–49 USD/h9.4M PLNn/avoice AI 10% iOS and Swift50Website Clutch KRS
–
unicrew too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 6250–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% AWS50Website Clutch
–
Yellow too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 6050–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% Python50Website Clutch
–
EMFIRE too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 225–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 40% Google Cloud49Website Clutch
–
Apriorit too little client evidence
Poznań250-9994.9 · 46100–149 USD/h414K PLN-12K PLNvoice AI 15% Google Cloud48Website Clutch KRS
–
Computools too little client evidence
Warsaw250-9994.9 · 10625–49 USD/h1.6M PLN-387K PLNvoice AI 10% Android48Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Processifier too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 40% Azure48Website Clutch
–
Atomify under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 525–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 35%47Website Clutch
–
Inwedo too little client evidence
Łódź50-2494.6 · 950–99 USD/h7.3M PLN-681K PLNvoice AI 15% Azure47Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Dashbouquet Development too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3450–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% Node.js46Website Clutch
–
Light IT Global too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 5425–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% Python46Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Synergy Labs too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4550–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% Flutter46Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Coreteka body leasing
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 1025–49 USD/h1.6M PLN-57K PLNvoice AI 15% Vue.js45Website Clutch KRS
–
FlairsTech IT services and help desk, not a software house
Warsaw1000-99994.6 · 11n/a1.9M PLN-1.2M PLNvoice AI 20% Azure45Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Onix-Systems too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.8 · 5625–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% React45Website Clutch
–
UASOFTDEV too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% AWS45Website Clutch
–
WiserBrand too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 16100–149 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% PHP and Laravel45Website Clutch
–
Brocoders too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 3950–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 25% AWS44Website Clutch
–
Cleveroad too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 8225–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% AWS44Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Polar Night Software too little client evidence
Łódź10-494.8 · 850–99 USD/h5.1M PLN-172K PLNvoice AI 10% React44Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Addepto (Part of KMS Technology) too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1950–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% Python43Website Portfolio Clutch
–
CleverLabs too little client evidence
n/a10-494.8 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% AWS43Website Clutch
–
Cloudsail based in Kalisz; local office unconfirmed
n/a10-494.9 · 6n/an/an/avoice AI 30% AWS43Website Clutch
–
Zealous System too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.6 · 24n/an/an/avoice AI 30% Shopify42Website Clutch
–
10Clouds Financial Institutions too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 9550–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% AWS41Website Clutch
–
IT Flow AI under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 30% Python41Website Clutch
–
Vention based in Warsaw; local office unconfirmed
Warsaw1000-99994.9 · 10350–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% AWS41Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Bright Coders' Factory body leasing
Opole50-2494.0 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% Python40Website Clutch KRS
–
Pirxey too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 15% .NET40Website Clutch
–
SysGears too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 3025–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% AWS40Website Clutch
–
Yalantis too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.8 · 7950–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% AWS40Website Clutch
–
Appunite too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% AWS39Website Clutch
–
EMBIQ too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2550–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% AWS39Website Clutch
–
1000software too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1125–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% PHP and Laravel38Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Billennium too little client evidence
n/a1000-99995.0 · 1n/an/an/avoice AI 20% Java38Website Clutch KRS
–
Dedicatted too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1150–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% AWS38Website Clutch
–
EL Passion too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 5850–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% Node.js38Website Clutch
–
G-Group.dev too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1225–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% AWS38Website Clutch
–
LAB325 too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 825–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% Node.js38Website Clutch
–
SLON Media too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 6125–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 15%38Website Clutch
–
Meant4.com too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 650–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% Google Cloud37Website Clutch
–
Artkai too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 5350–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 15% Azure36Website Clutch
–
CodeWith under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 425–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% TypeScript36Website Clutch
–
Ftech-it too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1725–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 15% .NET36Website Clutch
–
Fulcrum too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 4025–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 15% AWS36Website Clutch
–
Helpware Tech too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 3050–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 15% AWS36Website Clutch
–
NextApps too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 350–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% Azure36Website Clutch
–
Simform office unconfirmed (Clutch “serves”)
n/a1000-99994.8 · 8925–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% Azure36Website Clutch
–
Codahead too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.7 · 625–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20% AWS35Website Clutch
–
Corpsoft Solutions based in n/d; local office unconfirmed
n/d50-2495.0 · 2150–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% PHP and Laravel35Website Clutch
–
Crunch-IS too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1625–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 15% Python35Website Clutch
–
DAC.digital too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1050–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% AWS35Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Future Processing too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.7 · 5150–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% Azure35Website Clutch
–
Readiy too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2n/an/an/avoice AI 20% AWS35Website Clutch
–
Upside too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 10100–149 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% AWS35Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Binariks too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 6650–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% .NET34Website Clutch
–
Infograins Software Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 8950–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% iOS and Swift34Website Clutch
–
SDLC Corp too little client evidence
n/a1000-99995.0 · 1925–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 12% Android34Website Clutch
–
TUATARA too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 250–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 20%34Website Clutch
–
datarockets too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 2250–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10%33Website Clutch
–
Insightland too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 550–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 15%33Website Clutch
–
Atomic Actions too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% Python32Website Clutch
–
Brival based in Częstochowa; local office unconfirmed
n/a10-495.0 · 16100–149 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% TypeScript32Website Clutch
–
co.brick too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.7 · 550–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% Google Cloud32Website Clutch
–
codequest too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2650–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% AWS32Website Clutch
–
Geeknauts too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 1325–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% TypeScript32Website Clutch
–
Hygge Software too little client evidence
n/a50-2495.0 · 1525–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% Android32Website Clutch
–
Seven Bison too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 350–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 15%32Website Clutch
–
SoftKraft too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2450–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% Python32Website Clutch
–
Vstorm (Leading AI Agent Company) too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 22100–149 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10%32Website Clutch
–
Blackthorn Vision too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 2425–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% .NET31Website Portfolio Clutch
–
MobiDev Corporation too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 1650–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10%31Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Symphony Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 1925–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% AWS31Website Clutch
–
26bitz under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% AWS30Website Clutch
–
8allocate too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.7 · 2550–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% Databricks and Snowflake30Website Clutch
–
Eastoner too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 525–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% .NET30Website Clutch
–
Nozomi too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% iOS and Swift30Website Clutch
–
QBurst too little client evidence
n/a1000-99994.7 · 2825–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% AWS30Website Clutch
–
Svitla Systems too little client evidence
n/a1000-99994.8 · 3225–49 USD/hn/an/avoice AI: 1 role AWS30Website Portfolio Clutch
–
ApexTech too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 950–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% Ruby on Rails29Website Clutch
–
EfficientWeb too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 450–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% PHP and Laravel29Website Clutch
–
SaM Solutions too little client evidence
n/a250-9994.5 · 150–99 USD/hn/an/avoice AI 10% Magento (Adobe Commerce)26Website Clutch

Who is not in the top 10, and why

Service-area listings without confirmed local offices 3

A Clutch service-area listing does not establish an office. These records lack the location evidence required for this ranking. A paid placement by itself does not lower the score.

  • Leobit (paid)
  • Tallium (paid) · Rzeszów
  • Simform (paid)

Body leasing, product companies and other services 12

Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.

  • Scalo · Wrocław
  • Techstack company · Wrocław
  • USEO · Wrocław
  • EffectiveSoft · Warsaw
  • Siili Solutions · Wrocław
  • Codewave · Wrocław
  • Emerline · Warsaw
  • Coherent Solutions · Wrocław
  • ImproveIT Solutions · Warsaw
  • Coreteka · Wrocław
  • FlairsTech · Warsaw
  • Bright Coders' Factory · Opole

Website not confirmed 1

The data lacks a confirmed link between the website and the registered company. The company remains unranked until the entity behind the filings and reviews is identified.

  • Clover Dynamics · Kraków

Ranked 11th and below 36

They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.

  • GLOBALDEV · Warsaw
  • CleverDev Software · Warsaw
  • Instinctools · Warsaw
  • Deviniti · Wrocław
  • FREYSOFT · Warsaw
  • Netguru · Poznań
  • Agiliway · Kraków
  • Momentum · Wrocław
  • Solvd · Warsaw
  • Gecko Dynamics · Kraków
  • Darly Solutions · Warsaw
  • deepsense.ai · Warsaw
  • + 24 more in the full table

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders 16

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • NeuralSpike · Wrocław
  • YarMobile
  • EMFIRE
  • Apriorit · Poznań
  • Processifier
  • Atomify
  • IT Flow AI
  • Billennium
  • CodeWith
  • NextApps
  • Readiy
  • TUATARA
  • + 4 more in the full table

Weak evidence for voice AI 57

They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.

  • Jellyfish.tech
  • unicrew
  • Yellow
  • Dashbouquet Development
  • Light IT Global
  • Synergy Labs
  • Onix-Systems
  • UASOFTDEV
  • WiserBrand
  • Brocoders
  • Cleveroad (paid)
  • Addepto (Part of KMS Technology)
  • + 45 more in the full table

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h 41 (+3 no PL office)
50-99 USD/h 84
100-149 USD/h 8
150-199 USD/h 0
Rates declared on Clutch, 133 companies with an office in Poland. In brackets: companies “serving” Poland without an office.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Call their bot yourself and time the reply: more than a second of silence feels broken on the phone. Ask how it handles interruptions, accents and a transfer to a person.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of November 2, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best voice AI and speech development companies in Poland in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Modsen (83), 2. Oxagile (82), 3. Freeport Metrics (82), 4. iMakeable (78), 5. Plavno (75). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company in the data set.

How much do voice AI agencies in Poland charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does voice AI?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or the Wrocław company catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,494 companies in the data set
  • 731 with KRS records
  • 462 with a financial statement
  • 7,436 Clutch listing records
  • 690 employee review profiles on GoWork

Sources: Clutch profiles and listings, KRS records, available financial statements from rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository, GoWork reviews, JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs listings, and the Wrocław company catalog. Coverage varies by company; dates and links accompany the available records. The 0 to 100 score combines five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Paid Clutch placements do not increase the score.

Disclosures

  • Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, source links and dates accompany the available company records.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Best software development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked by registers, filings and reviews, out of 1472 checked across Poland. Best voice AI software houses in Warsaw 10 companies ranked out of 64 with voice AI evidence in Warsaw. Best React development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 442 with React evidence in Poland. Best TypeScript development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 221 with TypeScript evidence in Poland. Best Next.js development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 106 with Next.js evidence in Poland. Best Node.js development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 340 with Node.js evidence in Poland. Best AI agent development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 118 with AI agents evidence in Poland. Best MCP server and AI integration companies in Poland 6 companies ranked out of 7 with MCP servers and AI integrations evidence in Poland. Best LLM and generative AI development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 337 with LLM and generative AI evidence in Poland. Best forward deployed AI engineering companies in Poland 6 companies ranked out of 12 with forward deployed AI engineering evidence in Poland. Best chatbot and conversational AI development companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 262 with chatbots and conversational AI evidence in Poland. Best business process automation companies in Poland 10 companies ranked out of 40 with business process automation evidence in Poland.
Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center