ciunkos.com Rankings

Energy in Kraków, ranked for 2027

Best energy software houses in Kraków

  1. 1 Solidstudio 86
  2. 2 Codibly 80
  3. 3 korg.software 80

13 companies with evidence of energy work in Kraków; 6 meet the ranking criteria. Sources: 13 by their Clutch profile, KRS records, available financial statements and employee reviews. I sell the alternative: one senior engineer working with AI agents.

Get matched offers in 24 hours See the top 6 Download the data (CSV)

  • 13 company records
  • 7 with KRS records
  • 6 with a financial statement
  • 6 with an employee review profile
  • 6 ranked

Find your fit

Compare companies

#CompanyPeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Solidstudio profit 2M PLN (2025)
10-494.8 · 1550–99 USD/henergy 40% AWS86
2
Codibly profit 4.8M PLN (2025) GoWork 11/31
50-2494.7 · 1750–99 USD/henergy 70% AWS80
3
korg.software profit 121K PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 1025–49 USD/henergy 45% React80
4
AMC TECH profit 27K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 1750–99 USD/henergy 15% .NET64
5
Lunar Logic loss 236K PLN (2025)
10-494.9 · 2750–99 USD/henergy 20% Ruby on Rails63
650-2495.0 · 8150–99 USD/henergy 20%53

The ranking

Solidstudio

Kraków company building EV charging software: a charge point management platform, eMSP driver app and OCPP/OCPI gateways.

86/100

Clutch: 4.8 (15 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Google: 5.0 (10 reviews)

Best for: Charge point operators, energy companies and automotive firms that need EV charging management software or a migration of an existing charging platform.

Verdict. Pick Solidstudio if you run or plan an EV charging network and want a proven CPMS with protocol expertise. Skip it for general software outside eMobility.

Pros

  • Net profit of 2,000,000 PLN in 2025 on 18,500,000 PLN revenue. (2026-11-13 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.8/5 from 15 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Published projects: ewe go, GreenWay, Connected Kerb.
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The home page claims 60,000+ charge points under management in 15 markets on 4 continents and 5M+ charging sessions per month, and supports OCPP 1.6 and 2.0.1 and OCPI 2.2.1 (source).
  • The about page says the company has built eMobility software since 2017, lists ISO 27001 and a DEKRA-certified ISMS, and cites a zero-downtime migration of 9,000 sockets for Connected Kerb (source).
  • Awards on the about page: Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Central Europe 2024, ranked #5 in Central Europe and #2 in Poland, and FT1000 2025 at #71 (source).
  • Case studies cover ewe go, GreenWay and Connected Kerb; logos include Siemens, ENGIE, Volvo and Hubject (source).

Clients they name: ewe go, GreenWay, Connected Kerb

CPO platform (CPMS) White-label eMSP driver app EV network intelligence (AI) OCPP, OCPI and OICP gateways Platform migration eMobility consulting
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2016
HQ (KRS)
Kraków
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
57K PLN
Owners
Bvg Fund Coöperatief U.a.; family foundation
Revenue
18.5M PLN (2025)
Profit
2M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Google Business Profile
Solidstudio · 5.0 (10 reviews) (November 11, 2026)
Hiring (last 90 days)
role seen October 5, 2026
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (1/0)

Score: 86/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.6/5 Stability 4.8/5 Specialization 5.0/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 1.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS GoWork

Sources (9) · Checked November 13, 2026

Codibly

Kraków software firm in the Spyrosoft Group, building EV charging and renewable energy software.

80/100

Clutch: 4.7 (17 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Google: 4.7 (27 reviews)

Best for: EV charging operators and energy device makers that need OCPP, OpenADR or grid integration for connected hardware.

Verdict. Choose Codibly for EV charging or energy device software where protocol knowledge matters. For software outside energy, pick a generalist firm.

Pros

  • Net profit of 4,800,000 PLN in 2025 on 30,500,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 4.7/5 from 17 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The contact page lists an office in Kraków. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • GoWork records 11 positive and 31 negative reviews. These are user opinions, not independently established events. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The offer also includes staff augmentation. Agree who owns project delivery in the contract. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The home page says Codibly has been part of the Spyrosoft Group since June 2024 (source).
  • The site offers accelerators for OCPP 1.6J, 2.0.1 and 2.1, OCPI, OpenADR and IEEE 2030.5 (source).
  • The company page says the parent group Spyrosoft is listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (source).
  • Clutch puts IT staff augmentation at 20% of its work (source).
  • Codibly integrates EMS and battery storage with EV charging by bridging protocols such as Modbus, OPC UA, OCPP and OpenADR. (source)

Clients they name: Siemens Energy, SolarEdge, Wallbox, Hubject, Circle K, Yotta Energy, Nordex

Custom software development System integrations EV charging protocol accelerators (OCPP, OCPI) Energy management and grid software Team augmentation and dedicated teams Build-Operate-Transfer AI
Codibly homepage
Homepage of codibly.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Codibly.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2024
HQ (KRS)
Kraków
Legal form
S.A.
Share capital
114K PLN
Revenue
30.5M PLN (2025)
Profit
4.8M PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
Google Business Profile
Codibly · 4.7 (27 reviews) (November 11, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
negative (11/31)

Score: 80/100

Transparency 4.3/5 Client reputation 3.1/5 Stability 3.8/5 Specialization 5.0/5 Activity 3.8/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

korg.software

Small Kraków software house building custom web apps, websites and SaaS, with a second team in Ełk.

80/100

Clutch: 5.0 (10 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Google: 5.0 (49 reviews)

Best for: A small service business that needs a custom web app, like quote automation, built by a small team.

Verdict. Pick korg.software for a small web app or internal tool on a tight budget. Skip it for a mobile app or a project that needs a large team.

Pros

  • Net profit of 120,700 PLN in 2025 on 907,700 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 10 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000942086. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The team page lists 9 people, from the CEO to frontend developers. (source)
  • The Highline case study describes automated quotes, payments and invoicing built in React and Node. (source)
  • The site shows three case studies, Highline, Corgi and Singula, and no portfolio index. (source)
  • The site does not mention Kotlin or Android work. (source)

Clients they name: Highline, Wiso Group

Custom software development Website creation Product design Ongoing support and maintenance
korg.software homepage
Homepage of korg.software, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to korg.software.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Kraków
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
1 shareholder (individual)
Revenue
908K PLN (2025)
Profit
121K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
The Org
org chart: 4 positions, 1-10 employees
Google Business Profile
korg.software · 5.0 (49 reviews) (November 10, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 80/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 4.0/5 Stability 3.3/5 Specialization 5.0/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

AMC TECH

Kraków engineering firm designing electronics, embedded software, mechanics and production lines for industrial and consumer products.

64/100

Clutch: 5.0 (17 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD Google: 4.9 (7 reviews)

Best for: Manufacturers and hardware startups that need electronics, firmware and an app designed together.

Verdict. Take AMC TECH when your product has a circuit board or a sensor. For a pure web or SaaS product, pick a software house.

Pros

  • Net profit of 26,900 PLN in 2025 on 11,500,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 17 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • The contact page lists an office in Kraków. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • AMC TECH combines electronics, mechanics and software. Sister brands AMC Vibro and AMC Works handle machine monitoring and assembly (source).
  • The about page claims 20+ years, 100+ engineers, 150+ clients and an ISO 9001 quality system (source).
  • The foreign contacts in Denmark, the US, Switzerland and the UK are partner firms. The company itself sits at Pilotów 2E in Kraków (source).
  • Clutch gives 1992 as the founding year and lists 17 reviews, including Solaris and Analog Devices. The registry entity in our file dates from 2015 (source).

Clients they name: Bosch, Siemens, Volvo, Solaris, Alstom Power, Pesa

Embedded and application software Electronics design Industrial design and mechanics Production line design IoT and Industry 4.0 Technology partnership for startups
AMC TECH homepage
Homepage of amctech.com/?lang_redirect=en, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to AMC TECH.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2015
HQ (KRS)
Kraków
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
125K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
11.5M PLN (2025)
Profit
27K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
The Org
org chart: 17 positions, 10-50 employees
Google Business Profile
AMC TECH · 4.9 (7 reviews) (November 10, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (2/1)

Score: 64/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.9/5 Stability 4.8/5 Specialization 1.9/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked October 28, 2026

Lunar Logic

Kraków product studio taking founders from MVP to a growing product, run without managers.

63/100

Clutch: 4.9 (27 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 5,000 USD Google: 5.0 (7 reviews)

Best for: Founder with an early product who wants discovery, UX design and engineering from one small team.

Verdict. Pick Lunar Logic when a founder needs product thinking and engineering together. Skip it if you need a large team fast.

Pros

  • Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 27 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Published projects: HabitatMap, Hypo, Urb-it.
  • Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000217813. (2026-10-28 · source)

Cons

  • Net loss of 236,100 PLN in 2025 on 2,400,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The about page says no managers sit between clients and engineers, and salaries and finances are open. (source)
  • The about page dates its first commercial Ruby project to 2004, for United Nations Japan. (source)
  • The portfolio lists a 17-year partnership with HabitatMap. (source)
  • The home page claims 200+ projects in 15 countries. (source)

Clients they name: HabitatMap, Hypo, Urb-it, Funding Circle, ING Bank, Philips

Product discovery and validation Product design and UX Web application development MVP development Process optimization Support for growing products AI Node.js JavaScript
Lunar Logic homepage
Homepage of www.lunarlogic.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Lunar Logic.
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2004
HQ (KRS)
Kraków
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
88K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Revenue
2.4M PLN (2025)
Loss
236K PLN (2025)
Team size (Clutch)
10-49
Google Business Profile
Lunar Logic | Agile Software House · 5.0 (7 reviews) (November 10, 2026)
Hiring (last 90 days)
2 engineering roles open (seen November 10, 2026)
Employee reviews (GoWork)
too few (0/0)

Score: 63/100

Transparency 5.0/5 Client reputation 3.8/5 Stability 2.3/5 Specialization 2.5/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 5.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn GoWork

Sources (11) · Checked November 12, 2026

Indeema

IoT product engineering firm covering hardware, firmware, cloud and apps, with engineering in Lviv and Wrocław.

53/100

Clutch: 5.0 (81 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 50,000 USD Premier Verified Google: 5.0 (33 reviews)

Best for: Hardware companies that need a connected device built end to end, from electronics and firmware to cloud and apps, including medical devices.

Verdict. Take Indeema for a full connected product, especially one that needs ISO 13485. Skip it if you want a Polish entity with filed accounts or a budget under $50,000.

Pros

  • Clutch rating of 5/5 from 81 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • Published projects: Sensocor, iReDS, LiftEnergy+.
  • Certifications listed by the company: ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 13485. (2026-10-30 · source)

Cons

  • Declared minimum project: 50,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
  • This record has no linked financial statement; this is a coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
Projects & technologies

Source observations

  • The home page says the company was founded in 2010, has 230+ engineers, 200+ delivered projects and 25 published case studies, with engineering in Lviv and Wrocław (source).
  • The home page lists ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 13485 certificates issued by CERTSYSTEMS (source).
  • Case studies include a connected ventilation unit on ThingsBoard, a vibration monitoring system and a heart-signal sensor with a doctor's portal (source).
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 81 reviews, a $50,000 minimum, HQ in Wilmington, DE and offices in Kraków, Bern and Frankfurt, with founding listed as 2014; some reviewers raise estimation accuracy and team turnover (source).

Clients they name: Sensocor, iReDS, LiftEnergy+, Tykho Electronics

IoT product engineering Hardware and electronics Embedded and firmware Cloud and connected systems Web and mobile apps for IoT Edge AI Product discovery and MVP AI
Facts from the registers
In KRS since
2021
HQ (KRS)
Wrocław, office in Kraków
Legal form
sp. z o.o.
Share capital
5K PLN
Owners
2 shareholders (individuals)
Team size (Clutch)
50-249
The Org
org chart: 107 positions, 10-50 employees
Google Business Profile
Indeema Inc. · 5.0 (33 reviews) (November 11, 2026)

Score: 53/100

Transparency 3.8/5 Client reputation 4.5/5 Stability 1.5/5 Specialization 2.5/5 Activity 2.5/5 Hiring 0.0/5

Website Portfolio Clutch KRS LinkedIn

Sources (6) · Checked October 28, 2026

All companies

Show all 13 companies
Size: Rate: · 13
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
Solidstudio energy 40% AWS
Kraków10-494.8 · 1550–99 USD/h18.5M PLN2M PLNenergy 40% AWS86Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
2
Codibly energy 70% AWS
Kraków50-2494.7 · 1750–99 USD/h30.5M PLN4.8M PLNenergy 70% AWS80Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
3
korg.software energy 45% React
Kraków10-495.0 · 1025–49 USD/h908K PLN121K PLNenergy 45% React80Website Clutch KRS
4
AMC TECH energy 15% .NET
Kraków50-2495.0 · 1750–99 USD/h11.5M PLN27K PLNenergy 15% .NET64Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
5
Lunar Logic energy 20% Ruby on Rails
Kraków10-494.9 · 2750–99 USD/h2.4M PLN-236K PLNenergy 20% Ruby on Rails63Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
6
Indeema energy 20%
Wrocław50-2495.0 · 8150–99 USD/hn/an/aenergy 20%53Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
JSON Crew under 10 people
Kraków2-94.5 · 150–99 USD/h203K PLN-33K PLNenergy 15% AWS48Website Clutch KRS
–
Crunch-IS too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1625–49 USD/hn/an/aenergy 25% Python45Website Clutch
–
Lemberg Solutions too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 2750–99 USD/hn/an/aenergy 25% AWS45Website Portfolio Clutch
–
GT too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.8 · 1250–99 USD/hn/an/aenergy 20% Unity and game development44Website Clutch
–
Eastoner too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 525–49 USD/hn/an/aenergy 20% .NET40Website Clutch
–
Codahead too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.7 · 625–49 USD/hn/an/aenergy 15% AWS34Website Clutch
–
NoProblem AI website not confirmed
n/a10-495.0 · 225–49 USD/hn/an/aenergy 15%29Clutch

Who is not in the top 6, and why

Website not confirmed 1

The data lacks a confirmed link between the website and the registered company. The company remains unranked until the entity behind the filings and reviews is identified.

  • NoProblem AI

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders 1

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • JSON Crew

Weak evidence for energy 5

They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.

  • Crunch-IS
  • Lemberg Solutions
  • GT
  • Eastoner
  • Codahead

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h 5
50-99 USD/h 8
100-149 USD/h 0
150-199 USD/h 0
Rates declared on Clutch, 13 companies with an office in the city.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Energy projects touch metering, grid data and EV charging protocols such as OCPP. Ask for the protocols and devices they worked with.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of November 13, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best energy software houses in Kraków in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Solidstudio (86), 2. Codibly (80), 3. korg.software (80), 4. AMC TECH (64), 5. Lunar Logic (63). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company in the data set.

How much do energy agencies in Kraków charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does energy?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or the Wrocław company catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,424 companies in the data set
  • 1,101 with KRS records
  • 1,003 with a financial statement
  • 7,436 Clutch listing records
  • 849 employee review profiles on GoWork

Sources: Clutch profiles and listings, KRS records, available financial statements from rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository, GoWork reviews, JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs listings, and the Wrocław company catalog. Coverage varies by company; dates and links accompany the available records. The 0 to 100 score combines six axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity and hiring in the last 90 days. Paid Clutch placements do not increase the score.

Disclosures

  • Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, source links and dates accompany the available company records.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center