130 companies with evidence of computer vision work in Poland; 42 meet the ranking criteria. Sources: 122 by their Clutch profile, 3 by their open roles on JustJoin.it, 10 by their own website, KRS records, available financial statements and employee reviews. If one senior engineer is enough, I build AI features with AI agents.
Best for: A funded startup or a brand that wants a known Wrocław name with a big public portfolio, a US office and official Vue and Nuxt partner status.
Verdict. The best-known name on this list and the best client reviews by volume, dragged down by what its own people say. Hire it for the portfolio, write the team into the contract.
Pros
Net profit of 1,200,000 PLN in 2025 on 29,300,000 PLN revenue. (2026-09-22 · source)
Clutch rating of 4.8/5 from 64 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Best for: Manufacturers and logistics companies that need computer vision, embedded AI or robotics software, from an MVP to a production system.
Verdict. A specialist, and the numbers back it up. If your product has a camera, a sensor or a robot in it, start here; if it is a web app, look elsewhere on this list.
Pros
Net profit of 3,500,000 PLN in 2025 on 13,300,000 PLN revenue. (2026-09-22 · source)
Clutch rating of 5/5 from 11 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
xBerry is the only hardware-adjacent firm in the set, working on robotics, embedded AI and vision inspection. The site shows an EU regional development grant badge (source).
The FAQ gives a price signal, saying a simple MVP starts from tens of thousands of euros (source).
The founding year conflicts, with 2016 on the site, 2015 on Clutch and 2019 in the KRS entry in our file (source).
Most case studies hide the client (our Swedish partner, a leading vaccine manufacturer). Only Coco and Szajna are named, and CSHARK appears as a testimonial giver (source).
Best for: Polish brands with at least 25,000 USD that need a Flutter mobile app or a .NET and React web app.
Verdict. Take mobitouch for a branded Flutter app backed by the most client reviews in Rzeszów. For a long platform build, ask about team continuity first.
Pros
Net profit of 168,600 PLN in 2025 on 7,400,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 5/5 from 61 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Best for: Companies that need a large dedicated team fast, across many technologies, and can run it with their own product owner.
Verdict. Use Andersen to scale a team you lead, backed by 129 Clutch reviews. Check who signs the contract, given the thin Polish margin and the multi-entity setup.
Pros
Net profit of 363,200 PLN in 2025 on 177,100,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 129 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Best for: Enterprises in pharma, healthcare, finance or manufacturing that need AI agents, enterprise knowledge systems or MLOps built by a large, profitable AI specialist.
Verdict. Pick deepsense.ai for an enterprise AI agent, RAG or MLOps program, especially in pharma or healthcare, where budget is not the main constraint. Skip it for a small pilot under $25,000 or if employee sentiment matters in your vendor review.
Pros
Net profit of 38,900,000 PLN in 2025 on 89,700,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 5/5 from 10 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Polish legal entity record available in KRS: 0000727508. (2026-10-28 · source)
Cons
GoWork records 5 positive and 6 negative reviews. These are user opinions, not independently established events. (2026-10-28 · source)
Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies
Source observations
The home page claims 200 commercial AI projects, 120 AI experts and 10 years of AI work, and names Unstructured, Sky, Hexagon, Zebra Technologies and Brainly in client quotes (source).
The about page says the company has provided AI solutions since 2014, reports an NPS of 82, and says 67% of revenue comes from clients of more than 2 years (source).
The site lists Anthropic, OpenAI and Gemini Enterprise partner status and dedicated pages for pharma, clinical trials and healthcare (source).
Case studies include a deep research agent with an 84% response quality rate and a GPU setup with 96.3% average utilization (source).
The contact page lists the Warsaw HQ at al. Jerozolimskie 44 and an office in Palo Alto, California (source).
Best for: Companies that want a certified team to build a web, mobile or AI product or rewrite a legacy system.
Verdict. Pick Merixstudio for a web or AI product or a legacy rewrite, backed by ISO certificates and 97 Clutch reviews. If you need only one or two engineers, it fits less well.
Pros
Net profit of 2,900,000 PLN in 2025 on 29,100,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 4.8/5 from 97 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Certifications listed by the company: ISO 9001, ISO 27001. (2026-10-28 · source)
Cons
GoWork records 17 positive and 32 negative reviews. These are user opinions, not independently established events. (2026-10-28 · source)
Declared minimum project: 25,000 USD; compare this entry budget with your scope. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies
Source observations
The brand says it has built software since 1999. The legal entity, MERIXSTUDIO sp. z o.o., has KRS 0000938427 from 2021 (source).
The about page claims about 100 expert-level people, all mids and seniors (source).
ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 are shown with TÜV NORD Polska logos (source).
The Dubai presence runs through an on-site partner, Solution21, rather than an own office (source).
Best for: Teams that must add several developers quickly and can manage an outsourced team under their own tech lead.
Verdict. Use Innowise for staff augmentation under your own tech lead when you need CVs fast across many technologies. Skip it when you need a partner whose past work you can verify.
Pros
Net profit of 3,000,000 PLN in 2025 on 251,200,000 PLN revenue. (2026-10-28 · source)
Clutch rating of 4.9/5 from 73 client reviews. (2026-10-28 · source)
Certifications listed by the company: ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 13485. (2026-10-28 · source)
Cons
The offer also includes staff augmentation. Agree who owns project delivery in the contract. (2026-10-28 · source)
Projects & technologies
Source observations
The about page claims 3,500+ people, 1,600 projects and a founding year of 2007. The Polish company in KRS dates from 2021 (source).
The FAQ names Warsaw as headquarters, while the footer gives a registered address in Boston, MA (source).
The case studies page names no clients and warns that client details may be generalized or modified (source).
Innowise sells staff augmentation openly, promising CVs in 1 to 2 days and a team joining in 3 to 5 days (source).
AI consulting and LLM developmentCustom software engineeringLegacy-to-AI modernizationComputer vision and OCRDevOps, MLOps and FinOpsQA and AI testingAI
Homepage of azati.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Azati Software.
Computer visionGenerative AI and LLM systemsCloud-native architectureRemote teams and staff augmentationMVP and PoC developmentSystem consulting and auditsAI
Homepage of primotly.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Primotly.
Service-area listings without confirmed local offices 3
A Clutch service-area listing does not establish an office. These records lack the location evidence required for this ranking. A paid placement by itself does not lower the score.
Tallium (paid) · Rzeszów
Simform (paid)
Leobit (paid)
Struck off the register or in liquidation 1
They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.
Numlabs · Kraków
Body leasing, product companies and other services 9
Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.
N-iX · Kraków
Techstack company · Wrocław
Scalo · Wrocław
Coherent Solutions · Wrocław
Siili Solutions · Wrocław
EffectiveSoft · Warsaw
Emerline · Warsaw
Coreteka · Wrocław
Bright Coders' Factory · Opole
Ranked 11th and below 32
They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.
Solvd · Warsaw
Synergy Codes · Wrocław
Codya · Kraków
Euristiq · Warsaw
GLOBALDEV · Warsaw
JetSoftPro · Wrocław
Modsen · Warsaw
Software Mind · Kraków
Sparkbit · Warsaw
Darly Solutions · Warsaw
Tooploox · Wrocław
Lember · Wrocław
+ 20 more in the full table
Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders 16
Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.
Geniusee (paid) · Warsaw
NeuralSpike · Wrocław
HiveCV
Noctuai
Apriorit · Poznań
Seven Bison
QED Software
VolHan
IN-FOMO.
Jagan Solutions
Billennium
BeeCommerce.pl
+ 4 more in the full table
Weak evidence for computer vision 53
They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.
Digica
codequest
Svitla Systems
Flyps
INTechHouse
Cleveroad (paid)
DAC.digital
Devox Software
datarabbit
Aetsoft
Exposit
Lemberg Solutions
+ 41 more in the full table
What they charge
On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.
For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.
25-49 USD/h31 (+3 no PL office)
50-99 USD/h80
100-149 USD/h10
150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 121 companies with an office in Poland. In brackets: companies “serving” Poland without an office.
Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes
Ask for accuracy on data like yours, not on a public benchmark, and for how they label and refresh training data. Models drift when cameras, light or products change.
Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.
Get offers from the best-fit agencies
Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours
Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.
How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of November 2, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.
Questions
What are the best computer vision development companies in Poland in 2027?
By the score on this page: 1. Vality (80), 2. Monterail (79), 3. xBerry (76), 4. mobitouch (75), 5. Andersen (73). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company in the data set.
How much do computer vision agencies in Poland charge?
Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.
How do you know a company does computer vision?
From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or the Wrocław company catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.
Did any company pay to be on this list?
No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.
Can I get my company added or corrected?
Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.
How this ranking was made
1,494companies in the data set
731with KRS records
462with a financial statement
7,436Clutch listing records
690employee review profiles on GoWork
Sources: Clutch profiles and listings, KRS records, available financial statements from rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository, GoWork reviews, JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs listings, and the Wrocław company catalog. Coverage varies by company; dates and links accompany the available records. The 0 to 100 score combines five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Paid Clutch placements do not increase the score.
Disclosures
Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, source links and dates accompany the available company records.
Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.
“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation
Confidential by default. NDA is standard. I never show your project, name or screenshots without written consent, which is why this site names no clients without permission.
Your code, your accounts. Code and data stay in your repository and accounts. AI tools run with training on your data turned off, and secrets never reach a model.
A handover you can use. Every project ends with the same checklist: a README that gets it running, one architecture diagram, written decisions, CI, a runbook and a recorded walkthrough. It is done when someone outside the project can run it from the docs.
Boring technology where it counts. I pick a stack you can hire for. Anything experimental needs your yes and an exit plan.
Approach matched to your risk appetite. Prototype, product or regulated: the level decides how much autonomy the agents get and how much review and validation each change needs.
Everything checkable. Every number on my pages links to its source. My tools are free, and the idea validator skill is open source (MIT).
My pledge
Reply within 24 hours. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally, not a bot. Weekend messages: by Monday noon.
Late means free. If I am late, the first hour of work is free. You do not have to ask.
Scope in writing within 24 hours. A free 30-minute call with no company deck, then the scope and the price in writing within 24 hours. You decide.
The person who does the work. You talk to the person who does the work. No sales layer, no handoff.
Follow-up only with news. I follow up only when I have something new for you. Never a "did you see my offer".
Honest "not a fit". If I am not the right person, I say so on the call and point you to someone who is.
mobitouch 
Vality
