ciunkos.comRankings

UX/UI design in Wrocław, ranked for 2027

Best UX/UI design software houses in Wrocław

Ask whether the designers stay through development or hand over files and leave. Research with real users costs extra and is often the first thing cut. I found 29 companies with an office in Wrocław that show UX/UI design work in at least one source (26 by their Clutch profile, 4 by their open roles on JustJoin.it), and checked each in the court register, its latest filing and its employee reviews. 22 meet the ranking criteria and the 10 highest scores are below. I sell the alternative: one senior engineer working with AI agents.

In short: The highest-scoring UX/UI design software houses in Wrocław for 2027 are Zaven (score 88), CSHARK (score 87) and Blurify (score 83). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.

Get matched offers in 24 hoursSee the top 10Download the data (CSV)

  • 29companies checked
  • 25verified in KRS
  • 25with a financial statement
  • 23with an employee review profile
  • 10ranked

Which company fits your project

  • ZavenUX/UI design is 10% of service lines on its Clutch profile. Score 88, 5.0 on Clutch from 15 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • CSHARKUX/UI design is 10% of service lines on its Clutch profile. Score 87, 4.9 on Clutch from 19 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • BlurifyUX/UI design is 10% of service lines on its Clutch profile. Score 83, 5.0 on Clutch from 26 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • Synergy CodesUX/UI design is 30% of service lines on its Clutch profile. Score 82, 4.9 on Clutch from 15 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • One senior instead of a teamIf the project fits one person with coding agents, compare the cost before you pay an agency margin.

The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows UX/UI design work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.

The top 10 at a glance

Click a column to sort.

#CompanyPeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Zavenprofit 1.1M PLN (2025)GoWork 6/1
10-495.0 · 1525–49 USD/hCustom software88
2
CSHARKprofit 5.2M PLN (2025)
250-9994.9 · 1950–99 USD/hCustom software87
3
Blurifyprofit 309K PLN (2025)
50-2495.0 · 2650–99 USD/hCustom software83
4
Synergy Codesprofit 2.5M PLN (2025)GoWork 2/6
50-2494.9 · 15100–149 USD/hDiagram and graph editor82
5
Tooplooxprofit 1.6M PLN (2025)GoWork 13/22
50-2494.8 · 3550–99 USD/hAI81
6
Spyrosoft BSGprofit 4.5M PLN (2024)GoWork 2/5
50-2494.9 · 3050–99 USD/hWhite-label OTT platform81
7
Dropticaprofit 543K PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 950–99 USD/hDrupal code audit81
8
Boldareprofit 647K PLN (2025)GoWork 30/40
50-2494.8 · 6350–99 USD/hMVP development and digital prototyping74
9
Lemberprofit 70K PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 1025–49 USD/hCustom software73
10
Genuitekprofit 53K PLN (2023)
10-494.9 · 650–99 USD/hReact73

The ranking

The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how strong the UX/UI design evidence is. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.

Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.

Zaven

Process-driven software house building web and mobile apps for construction, real estate and utilities companies, mainly Nordic.

Clutch: 5.0 (15 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: A web or mobile product for a construction, real-estate or utilities company that wants a small, steady team in Wrocław and does not need a brand name.

Pros

  • Profitable every year in the filings we checked, with the latest statement showing a profit of 1.1M PLN on 12.7M PLN of revenue.
  • Employee reviews on GoWork are positive (6 positive, 1 negative), the rarest thing on this list.
  • Twenty named case studies, most of them Norwegian construction and marine clients, so you can check the work.
  • Publishes its own scale on the about page: roughly ten projects a year. Few agencies admit how small they are.
  • Still hiring on the job boards (2 open roles on October 27, 2026).

Cons

  • Since September 2026 fully owned by Multishoring Holdings, a Warsaw data and integration consultancy, so strategy is decided outside Wrocław.
  • Fifteen Clutch reviews only, and the declared rate band of 25 to 49 USD is the offshore band, which raises the question of who writes the code.
  • A team of 10 to 49 cannot staff several roles at once; expect a queue for bigger projects.
  • Founding year differs between the site, Clutch and the court register.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The site publishes its scale, with roughly 10 projects per year and about EUR 3M turnover in 2025 (source).
  • The site lists twenty named case studies, most of them Norwegian construction and marine clients such as Fonn, Grasp and Safran (source).
  • Age claims do not line up. The site says 15 years in business, Clutch says founded 2011, and the KRS entry in our file dates from 2014 (source).
  • The site shows no certifications, awards or partner badges (source).

Clients they name: Volve, Fonn, Grasp, Safran, Dionach, Bonduelle

Custom softwareMobile appsGenerative AICustom MCP developmentProduct UX/UI designStaff augmentationReactVueAngular.NET
Zaven homepage
Homepage of zaven.co, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Zaven.

Verdict. The most transparent small software house in Wrocław. It is profitable, its own people rate it well, and it publishes its size. Hire it for one well-defined product, not for a platform that needs five roles.

CSHARK

Software and digital transformation partner for fintech, regtech and industrial clients, with a Singapore office for Asian banks.

Clutch: 4.9 (19 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 50,000 USD

Best for: Fintech, regtech and industrial clients with a budget above 50,000 USD who want a mid-size Polish company with ISO 27001 and cloud partnerships.

Pros

  • Revenue of 80.9M PLN with a profit of 5.2M PLN in 2025, and four private individuals as owners (KRS).
  • ISO 27001, AWS and Microsoft partnerships, and a clear focus on two sectors instead of “everything for everyone”.
  • 4.9 on Clutch from 19 reviews; the Fenergo work appears in two separate case studies.
  • Hiring on the boards (3 open roles) and a Singapore office for Asian banking clients.

Cons

  • Logos of global banks on the homepage without case studies: treat them as unverified.
  • Minimum project of 50,000 USD, among the highest in the city; not for an MVP.
  • Headcount is not stated on the site; Clutch says 250 to 999, employee reviews are few and mixed (7 positive, 6 negative).

From their website and Clutch profile

  • CSHARK focuses on two sectors, fintech/regtech and industrial, and Fenergo appears in two separate case studies (source).
  • CSHARK is the only firm in the set with an Asian office, CSHARK Singapore Pte. Ltd on Robinson Road (source).
  • The homepage shows logos of Citibank, Allianz, BNP Paribas and Vodafone, but none of them has a case study, so treat them as unverified (source).
  • The site states no headcount, while Clutch lists 250 to 999 employees and a USD 50k minimum project (source).

Clients they name: Fenergo, ASA International, Telenor, RegenHU, Nudge, Pastdue Credit Solutions

Custom softwareApplication modernizationData and integrationCloud and infrastructureR&D and product designSoftware outsourcingJavaKotlinC#.NET
CSHARK homepage
Homepage of www.cshark.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to CSHARK.

Verdict. A mid-size house for regulated industries, with ISO 27001 to show for it. Come with a budget above 50,000 USD and a compliance checklist, not a two-month MVP.

Blurify

Wrocław software house building custom web and mobile apps on AWS for education, industry and, on its English site, iGaming.

Clutch: 5.0 (26 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Polish education, industry and public-sector clients who want a 50+ team with a Wrocław office, and iGaming companies through its English brand.

Pros

  • A 5.0 rating on Clutch from 26 reviews with named Polish clients such as Fundacja Orange and WSiP.
  • Profitable in 2025 (309K PLN on 9.3M PLN of revenue), two private individuals as owners (KRS), hiring on the boards (3 open roles).
  • Publishes a three-month warranty on critical bugs after launch and offers a free estimate, which few agencies put in writing.

Cons

  • Two brands, one company: blurify.pl is a general software house, blurify.com sells casino and sportsbook products. Ask which team you get and whether the iGaming side matters to your compliance.
  • The legal entity is Studio Software Sp. z o.o., so search KRS by that name, not “Blurify”.
  • Thin margin: the 2025 profit is a few percent of revenue. Too few employee reviews on GoWork to read the mood.
  • The AWS claim is three individual certifications, not a partner tier.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • blurify.pl presents a general software house for Polish education and industry. blurify.com positions the company as an iGaming developer with casino and sportsbook products (source).
  • The site lists fifteen case studies, several with named Polish clients such as Fundacja Orange, WSiP and WAGO (source).
  • The legal entity is Studio Software Sp. z o.o., which matters when you check the KRS (source).
  • The AWS claim rests on three individual certifications rather than a partner tier (source).

Clients they name: Fundacja Orange (MegaMisja), WSiP, WKS Śląsk Wrocław, WAGO, Vemcon, LifeTraq

Custom softwareWeb appsMobile appsMVPAI solutionsAWS and cloudReactNext.jsNode.jsPostgreSQL
Blurify homepage
Homepage of blurify.pl, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Blurify.

Verdict. Good client reviews and clear written terms, with one question to ask before signing: which of the two businesses would build your product.

Synergy Codes

Wrocław studio building diagram editors, workflow builders and data visualization in GoJS, React Flow and Angular.

Clutch: 4.9 (15 reviews)Rate: 100–149 USD/hMin. project: 5,000 USD

Best for: A SaaS team that needs a diagram editor, workflow builder or graph view inside its product, in Angular or React.

Pros

  • Works in one niche, with GoJS partner status and its own ngDiagram library for Angular.
  • Named clients include Siemens, BMW, Canon and AMBOSS.
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 15 reviews, with projects from 5,000 USD.
  • Has built visual interfaces for complex logic since 2011.

Cons

  • The site names Synergia Pro Sp. z o.o. as its legal entity, so check which company signs the contract.
  • Clutch rates sit at 100–149 USD per hour, high for a Polish shop.
  • GoWork shows 6 negative entries against 2 positive ones.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page names Synergia Pro Sp. z o.o. as the legal entity behind the Synergy Codes brand. (source)
  • The about page claims 60+ in-house staff and 200+ production systems shipped since 2011. (source)
  • The about page says the company holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification. (source)
  • The company released its ngDiagram library for Angular as open source under Apache 2.0 in 2024. (source)

Clients they name: Siemens, BMW, Canon, Autoliv, TotalEnergies, AMBOSS, Zeenea, peoplefone

Diagram and graph editor developmentWorkflow builder developmentData visualization toolsProduct discovery and UX/UI designAI features for diagramsUX, performance and code auditsTypeScriptReactAIMachine learning
Synergy Codes homepage
Homepage of www.synergycodes.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Synergy Codes.

Verdict. Synergy Codes fits a product where the diagram or workflow editor is the core feature. Look elsewhere for a general web app with no visual editor.

Tooploox

AI-first software company (owned by Solvd Inc.) building custom AI, mobile and web products for startups and research-heavy clients.

Clutch: 4.8 (35 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Products where machine learning or generative AI is the core, with a team that publishes research and builds the app around it.

Pros

  • Lists peer-reviewed papers, patents and conference talks on its site, more AI research than any other Wrocław agency.
  • Revenue of 63.8M PLN with a profit of 1.6M PLN in 2025, and named clients such as eBay and ETH Zurich.
  • 4.8 on Clutch from 35 reviews and still hiring AI engineers on the boards (2 open roles).

Cons

  • Owned by Solvd Inc. (USA) since the acquisition, so it is no longer an independent Wrocław company and decisions are made abroad.
  • Employee reviews are negative (13 positive, 22 negative) and 8 of them mention layoffs or cuts; expect rotation on your project.
  • The site gives only an R&D headcount of 40+; the total team size is not stated.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • Tooploox lists 30+ peer-reviewed papers, patents and contributions to NeurIPS, ICML and ECCV, the longest research record in the set (source).
  • Tooploox is now a Solvd Inc. company and no longer an independent Wrocław firm (source).
  • The site gives only an R&D headcount of 40+ engineers and researchers and no total team size (source).
  • No certifications, awards or partner badges are shown on the site (source).

Clients they name: eBay, ETH Zurich, Spire Health, StateSpace, PhotoAid, Ashoka

AI developmentGenerative AIAI discoveryProduct designMobile appsWeb developmentReactNode.jsPythonAI
Tooploox homepage
Homepage of tooploox.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Tooploox.

Verdict. The place in Wrocław for hard AI problems. For a plain web product the research premium buys you little, and the employee reviews are a real warning about continuity.

Spyrosoft BSG

Video and OTT streaming apps for broadcasters, sports leagues and telcos, part of the listed Spyrosoft Group.

Clutch: 4.9 (30 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Broadcasters and streaming services that need OTT, connected-TV and video apps, with named references at major European channels.

Pros

  • Named case studies with large broadcasters such as ITV and CANAL+, which is rare for a Wrocław agency.
  • 4.9 on Clutch from 30 reviews, revenue of 40M PLN with a profit of 4.5M PLN in the 2024 filing.
  • Part of Spyrosoft S.A., a listed Polish group, with offices in Bergen, Copenhagen and Gothenburg for Nordic clients.

Cons

  • Narrow focus: the whole offer is video and OTT. For a non-media product you are the wrong client.
  • Employee reviews are negative (2 positive, 5 negative) and no open roles on the boards at the last snapshot.
  • Headcount figures on the site contradict each other; the latest filing we have is for 2024, not 2025.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • Case studies name broadcasters such as Nordisk Film+, TV 2, ITV and CANAL+, which few Wrocław agencies can show (source).
  • The whole site is about OTT and video apps, so the firm suits media clients more than general software projects (source).
  • Headcount figures are inconsistent, with 200+ video specialists on the homepage, over 1,900 group employees on the about page and a '+1900K' typo in the stats block (source).
  • The site lists no ISO or partner tier certifications. The partners page names only technology vendors (Wowza, Brightcove, Mux, Axinom) (source).
  • Clutch shows 4.9 from 30 reviews, $50 to $99 per hour and a $25,000 minimum project. Its founding year of 2010 predates the 2016 KRS entry (source).

Clients they name: Nordisk Film+, TV 2 Play, Eleven Sports, ITV, CANAL+, Futsal Ekstraklasa

White-label OTT platformOTT managed servicesCustom video app development (Roku, Smart TV, Vega OS, HbbTV)Connected TV app developmentPOIS ad control for streamingAI solutions for mediaReactNode.js.NETPython
Spyrosoft BSG homepage
Homepage of bsgroup.eu, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Spyrosoft BSG.

Verdict. For a TV channel or a streaming service, it is the only Wrocław agency with named broadcaster references. For any other product, pick from the rest of the top 10.

Droptica

Drupal agency that audits, takes over, migrates and supports mission-critical Drupal platforms for enterprises and public institutions.

Clutch: 5.0 (9 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 5,000 USD

Best for: Organizations with a large Drupal site that need an audit, a Drupal 7 migration or a long-term support team.

Pros

  • Droptica reported a profit of 543K PLN on 12.6M PLN of revenue in 2025.
  • Droptica is a Gold Drupal Certified Partner with 80+ Acquia certifications and its own Drupal distributions.
  • The site has twenty-five named case studies, from PZPN and NATO to Henry Schein.
  • Clutch shows a 5.0 rating from 9 reviews, and the site shows ISO 27001.

Cons

  • Droptica works only on Drupal, so any other stack is a mismatch.
  • Employee reviews lean negative (4 positive, 7 negative), with 2 mentions of layoffs.
  • Clutch shows only 9 reviews, and the job boards had 1 open role at the last snapshot.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • Droptica has 44 people on Drupal.org and 24 maintained projects. It builds the Droopler, Open Intranet and Campus distributions and co-organizes DrupalCamp Poland (source).
  • The partner tier is inconsistent, with Gold Drupal Certified Partner on the homepage and English site and 'Silver' in the agency page text (source).
  • Droptica is one of only two companies in this group with ISO 27001 on the site. Its founding year, 2013, matches the KRS entry (source).
  • The YouTube channel 'Nowoczesny Drupal' posts Polish tutorials and weekly Drupal news. We found no showreel or about-us video (source).
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 9 reviews, a $5,000 minimum project, $50 to $99 per hour and three Polish locations (source).

Clients they name: PZPN, BOSSA, Exide Group, HERE.com, Henry Schein, Better Regulation

Drupal code auditDrupal support and Care & Growth plansDrupal 7 migration and upgrades to Drupal 11Headless Drupal with React or Next.jsAI features for DrupalMultisite DrupalJavaScriptReactNext.jsPHP

Verdict. Call Droptica first if your platform runs on Drupal, since its client work is public. If it does not, skip it.

Boldare

Gliwice-headquartered digital product and AI company with a Wrocław office that builds MVPs and products for startups and enterprises.

Clutch: 4.8 (63 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USDPremier Verified

Best for: Funded startups and companies that want an MVP or a product redesign led by product design.

Pros

  • Clutch shows 63 reviews averaging 4.8, one of the longest client review records in this list.
  • Boldare reported a profit of 647K PLN on 21.2M PLN of revenue in 2025.
  • Prototyping, MVP and design are core services, with named case studies such as DTIQ and Caidio.
  • Boldare has offices in Wrocław, Kraków and Warsaw besides its Gliwice seat.

Cons

  • GoWork opinions are more negative than positive (30 positive, 40 negative), with 12 mentions of layoffs.
  • GoWork got 9 positive reviews within two weeks from 2022-01-11.
  • Team size claims differ, with 100+ on the homepage and 200+ on the about page.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • Wrocław is one of four Polish offices, and the headquarters and legal seat are in Gliwice (source).
  • The about page claims 2004 roots and 200+ people in 6 European offices, while the home page says 100+ people and the footer lists 4 Polish offices (source: https://www.boldare.com/about/ and https://www.boldare.com/).
  • Boldare S.A. holds KRS 0000914518 from 2021, so the 2004 date refers to predecessor companies (source).
  • The company runs on holacracy and sells fixed-scope AI packages, including Claude Code adoption, without listing prices (source).
  • The only company-focused YouTube video announces a racing partnership, and the rest of the channel is a podcast on AI-native product building (source).

Clients they name: sonnen, BlaBlaCar, ZATCA, YOUCAT Foundation, DTIQ, Humanitas University

MVP development and digital prototypingFull cycle product design and developmentAI software development and consulting (including Claude Code services)UX/UI designCode and UX auditsDevelopment teams and software outsourcingReactNode.jsAI
Boldare homepage
Homepage of boldare.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Boldare.

Verdict. Pick Boldare for an MVP or a product redesign, backed by its design process and 63 client reviews. Given the staff opinions, ask who stays on your team.

Lember

Software development company with offices in Kyiv, Porto and Wrocław, offering custom builds, SaaS and staff augmentation.

Clutch: 5.0 (10 reviews)Rate: 25–49 USD/hMin. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Logistics and SaaS startups that want a Next.js or Angular team, for a full build or for staff augmentation.

Pros

  • Two logistics case studies, 3PL Fulfilment and Suppli, ran for 12 and 8 months.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 10 reviews.
  • Clutch puts 60% of its work in custom software development.
  • Clutch rates sit at $25–49 per hour.

Cons

  • The Polish company was registered in 2025 and reported 137K PLN of revenue for that year.
  • Wrocław is one of three listed offices, next to Kyiv and Porto.
  • Staff augmentation sits in the main services menu next to custom builds.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The about page claims 11+ years in business, 150+ projects, 50+ specialists and 65% returning customers. (source)
  • The contact page lists Kyiv, Porto and Wrocław, and the Wrocław address matches the Polish register. (source)
  • Logistics case studies include 3PL Fulfilment, built over 12 months, and Suppli, built over 8 months. (source)
  • The site names no Polish legal entity and gives a phone number with a +1 prefix. (source)

Clients they name: 3PL Fulfilment, OnePageCRM, DocStribute, Simasti, Persuasion Systems, Gigalty, Suppli, Tripety

Custom software developmentSaaS developmentLegacy software modernizationStaff augmentationCloud development and migrationAI development and integrationReactNode.jsAngular.NET
Lember homepage
Homepage of lember.io, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Lember.

Verdict. Pick Lember for a mid-size SaaS or logistics build with a distributed team. Skip it if you need a Polish team with local financial history.

Genuitek

Clutch: 4.9 (6 reviews)Rate: 50–99 USD/hMin. project: 10,000 USD

Pros

  • Profit of 53K PLN (2023)
  • Owned by private individuals (KRS)

Cons

  • n/a
ReactJavaFlutter
Genuitek homepage
Homepage of genuitek.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Genuitek.

Verdict. Strongest on transparency and specialization. Weakest axis: activity (1.5/5).

Every company we checked

The table below has the 29 companies with UX/UI design evidence in Wrocław, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.

Show all 29 companies
Size: Rate: · 29
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
ZavenCustom software
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1525–49 USD/h12.7M PLN1.1M PLNCustom software88WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
2
CSHARKCustom software
Wrocław250-9994.9 · 1950–99 USD/h80.9M PLN5.2M PLNCustom software87WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
3
BlurifyCustom software
Wrocław50-2495.0 · 2650–99 USD/h9.3M PLN309K PLNCustom software83WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
4
Synergy CodesDiagram and graph editor
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 15100–149 USD/h3.7M PLN2.5M PLNDiagram and graph editor82WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
5Wrocław50-2494.8 · 3550–99 USD/h63.8M PLN1.6M PLNAI81WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
6
Spyrosoft BSGWhite-label OTT platform
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 3050–99 USD/h40M PLN4.5M PLNWhite-label OTT platform81WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
7
DropticaDrupal code audit
Wrocław10-495.0 · 950–99 USD/h12.6M PLN543K PLNDrupal code audit81WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
8
BoldareMVP development and digital prototyping
Gliwice50-2494.8 · 6350–99 USD/h21.2M PLN647K PLNMVP development and digital prototyping74WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
9
LemberCustom software
Wrocław10-495.0 · 1025–49 USD/h137K PLN70K PLNCustom software73WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
10Wrocław10-494.9 · 650–99 USD/h1.8M PLN53K PLNReact73WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Vazcoproduct company
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 1950–99 USD/h10.4M PLN417K PLNTS/React/Node80WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Scalobody leasing
Wrocław250-9994.7 · 3350–99 USD/h162.2M PLN8.1M PLNIT outsourcing79WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Axabeeproduct company
Opole50-2495.0 · 350–99 USD/h32.7M PLN1.3M PLNReact77WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Siili Solutionsbody leasing
Wrocław250-9994.9 · 750–99 USD/h37.3M PLN3.4M PLNweb76WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Lama Mediatoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-494.9 · 925–49 USD/h322K PLN42K PLNCustom WordPress70WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
GREENLOGICtoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-494.9 · 425–49 USD/h1.3M PLN9K PLNPython69WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Hued.metoo little client evidence
Wrocław10-494.9 · 5n/a2.5M PLN410K PLNCustom applications69WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Grinntoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 1350–99 USD/h20.1M PLN-695K PLNElectronics design68WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
hero/dottoo little client evidence
Warsaw50-2494.9 · 1650–99 USD/h8.3M PLN-39K PLNReact66WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Sagitontoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 2050–99 USD/h10.8M PLN-458K PLNBusiness process automation66WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Angry Nerdstoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 2250–99 USD/h266K PLN-146K PLNAndroid/iOS64WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Gentle Codetoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 825–49 USD/h5.7M PLN-235K PLNJavaScript59WebsiteClutchKRS
–
ULAM LABStoo little client evidence
Wrocław50-2494.8 · 1350–99 USD/h235K PLN-194K PLNMedTech product59WebsitePortfolioClutchKRS
–
Spyrosoft Grouptoo little client evidence
Wrocław1000-99995.0 · 2n/a22 PLNn/aautomotive56ClutchKRS
–
Codeskatoo little client evidence
n/d10-495.0 · 1725–49 USD/hn/an/aweb46WebsiteClutch
–
25wattoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2025–49 USD/hn/an/a44WebsiteClutch
–
Cognizetoo little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 1350–99 USD/hn/an/aPHP43WebsiteClutch
–
Altimistruck off KRS
Wrocław50-2494.9 · 825–49 USD/h22 PLNn/aweb/mobile42WebsiteClutchKRS
–
Qulixtoo little client evidence
n/a250-9994.9 · 1050–99 USD/hn/an/aAI42WebsiteClutch

All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.

Who is not in the top 10, and why

Paid placements and “serves the city” without an office

On the Clutch city list the first positions are bought with ads (links through ppc.clutch.co) or a “serves” entry. These companies have no office in the city according to KRS or their own site, so they are not ranked here.

None in this city.

Struck off the register or in liquidation

They still show up on other people’s “best of” lists. Here they appear only in the full table.

  • Altimi

Body leasing, product companies and other services

Renting people into someone else’s team is a different service from delivering a project. A product company, a marketing agency or an SAP partner does not sell software projects either. They are in the full table with a label.

  • Vazco
  • Scalo
  • Axabee · Opole
  • Siili Solutions

On the city’s Clutch list, but based elsewhere

Clutch shows them on this city’s page, but KRS and our data do not confirm an office here. They are ranked in their own city.

None in this city.

Ranked 11th and below

They qualify but score lower. Their full rows are in the table below; the gap between 10th and 15th is often a few points.

  • Lama Media
  • Hued.me
  • Grinn
  • hero/dot · Warsaw
  • Sagiton
  • Angry Nerds
  • Gentle Code
  • ULAM LABS
  • Codeska · n/d
  • 25wat
  • Cognize
  • Qulix

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • GREENLOGIC
  • Spyrosoft Group

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h850-99 USD/h18100-149 USD/h1150-199 USD/h0
Rates declared on Clutch, 27 companies with an office in the city. In brackets: companies “serving” the city without an office.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. Ask whether the designers stay through development or hand over files and leave. Research with real users costs extra and is often the first thing cut.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement on rejestr.io: revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 28, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best UX/UI design software houses in Wrocław in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Zaven (88), 2. CSHARK (87), 3. Blurify (83), 4. Synergy Codes (82), 5. Tooploox (81). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.

How much do UX/UI design agencies in Wrocław charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does UX/UI design?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,485companies in the data set
  • 708checked in the National Court Register
  • 453with a financial statement
  • 7,436Clutch listing positions read, paid ones marked
  • 451employee review profiles on GoWork
  • 2+months of data collection, since September 2026

The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.

Disclosures

  • I worked at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product until November 2026. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center