ciunkos.com Rankings

TypeScript in Poznań, ranked for 2027

Best TypeScript software houses in Poznań

  1. 1 Flutter Development AA+ A startup that wants a Flutter MVP at a fixed price, or a team moving an old Cordova app to Flutter. 71
  2. 2 AppTailors Startup founders with a modest budget who want one small studio to design and build a Flutter app. 60
  3. 3 APPVERK Regulated-sector companies that need software built to pass a DORA, NIS2 or GDPR audit. 58

I checked 14 companies with an office in Poznań that show TypeScript work in at least one source (13 by their Clutch profile, 1 by their open roles on JustJoin.it) against the court register, their latest filing and their employee reviews. 5 meet the ranking criteria, and the 5 highest scores are below. If one senior engineer is enough, I build TypeScript and Node.js back ends with AI agents.

In short: The highest-scoring TypeScript software houses in Poznań for 2027 are Flutter Development AA+ (score 71), AppTailors (score 60) and APPVERK (score 58). The 0 to 100 score combines court register data, the latest financial statement, Clutch client reviews, GoWork employee reviews and open roles on the job boards. Paid Clutch positions do not count.

Get matched offers in 24 hours See the top 5 Download the data (CSV)

  • 14 companies checked
  • 6 verified in KRS
  • 6 with a financial statement
  • 5 with an employee review profile
  • 5 ranked

Which company fits your project

  • Flutter Development AA+ A startup that wants a Flutter MVP at a fixed price, or a team moving an old Cordova app to Flutter. TypeScript is 45% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 71, 5.0 on Clutch from 19 reviews, loss in 2024.
  • AppTailors Startup founders with a modest budget who want one small studio to design and build a Flutter app. TypeScript is 20% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 60, 5.0 on Clutch from 7 reviews, profit in 2024.
  • APPVERK Regulated-sector companies that need software built to pass a DORA, NIS2 or GDPR audit. TypeScript is 10% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 58, 5.0 on Clutch from 6 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • Merixstudio Companies that want a certified team to build a web, mobile or AI product or rewrite a legacy system. TypeScript is 10% of the technology focus on its Clutch profile. Score 57, 4.8 on Clutch from 97 reviews, profit in 2025.
  • One senior instead of a team If the project fits one person with coding agents, hire me for TypeScript and Node.js back ends before you pay an agency margin.

The picks come from the data in the full table, not from who paid. A company enters this list when at least one source shows TypeScript work; the share on Clutch is what the company declares.

The top 5 at a glance

Click a column to sort.

#CompanyPeopleClutchRateFocusScore
1
Flutter Development AA+ loss 130K PLN (2024)
10-495.0 · 1925–49 USD/hTypeScript 45% mobile app development71
2
AppTailors profit 639K PLN (2024)
10-495.0 · 7n/aTypeScript 20% startups and MVPs60
3
APPVERK profit 11K PLN (2025) GoWork 9/3
50-2495.0 · 650–99 USD/hTypeScript 10% fintech58
4
Merixstudio profit 2.9M PLN (2025) GoWork 17/32
50-2494.8 · 9750–99 USD/hTypeScript 10% AI agents57
5
Inigra profit 40K PLN (2025)
10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/hTypeScript 10% startups and MVPs52

The ranking

The order below is the score from five axes: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization and activity. Here specialization measures how deep the company goes into TypeScript (its share of the Clutch profile and of open roles) and weighs 35% instead of 15%, so specialists rank above large generalists. Weights and the full method are on the guide page.

Financial figures come from the latest filing of the Polish company. For subsidiaries of foreign groups they can be far from the size of the real business. Open the sources under each entry before you shortlist.

Flutter Development AA+

Poznań Flutter studio building and migrating mobile apps, with fixed-price packages and a one-year bug guarantee.

Clutch: 5.0 (19 reviews) Rate: 25–49 USD/h Min. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: A startup that wants a Flutter MVP at a fixed price, or a team moving an old Cordova app to Flutter.

Verdict. Codigee is a small, focused Flutter shop with published prices and good references. Take it for a mobile MVP or a Flutter migration. Skip it for a large multi-platform program.

Pros

  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 19 reviews, with named clients like Fitatu and PW Pieprzyk.
  • Publishes prices on its site, starting at 5,000 USD fixed for a small app.
  • Offers a one-year bug-fix guarantee on its MVP and custom packages.
  • Migrated Fitatu, an app with 10 million users, from Cordova to Flutter.

Cons

  • A small company that reported a loss of 130K PLN on 2.1M PLN of revenue in 2024.
  • The founding story does not line up, with 8 years on the site, 2018 on Clutch and 2020 in KRS.
  • Had zero open roles at the last snapshot, so a large team is unlikely.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The pricing page lists a Starter app from 5,000 USD fixed and a an MVP package from 15,000 USD (source).
  • The home page claims 8 years of expertise, Clutch says founded in 2018, and KRS shows the company registered in 2020 (source).
  • One case study covers a Cordova to Flutter migration of an app with 10 million users, Fitatu (source).
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 19 reviews, and several reviewers are other software houses buying staff augmentation (source).

Clients they name: Digitoys, Museo, Fitatu, Pieprzyk Group, Houzit, Fishpro, MELO

Flutter app development from scratch App migration to Flutter (including Cordova) Team augmentation AI agents in mobile apps Flutter and Unity integration Web and desktop development AI
Flutter Development AA+ homepage
Homepage of codigee.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Flutter Development AA+.

AppTailors

Small Poznań studio that designs and builds Flutter apps, mostly for health, sports and lifestyle startups.

Clutch: 5.0 (7 reviews) Rate: n/a Min. project: 10,000 USD

Best for: Startup founders with a modest budget who want one small studio to design and build a Flutter app.

Verdict. Hire AppTailors for a Flutter startup MVP with design included. Look elsewhere for enterprise integrations or a team that must grow past a few people.

Pros

  • Profitable in the filings we checked, with a 2024 profit of 639K PLN on 2.2M PLN of revenue.
  • The portfolio has 13 projects with named clients such as The Telegraph, Backtrace and Vagus.
  • The 10,000 USD Clutch minimum fits a first version of a startup app.

Cons

  • Clutch shows seven reviews and no hourly rate, and the site gives no address, legal name or team size.
  • Almost every portfolio project uses Flutter, Node.js and Google Cloud, so other stacks are a poor fit.
  • The latest filing in our data is for 2024, and the last snapshot showed zero open roles.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The portfolio lists 13 projects, and almost all of them use Flutter, Node.js and Google Cloud (source).
  • The contact page gives only an email address, with no legal name, street address or team size (source).
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 7 reviews, a 10,000 USD minimum, no hourly rate, and offices in Raleigh and London that the site does not mention (source).

Clients they name: The Telegraph, Backtrace, Vagus, Motzi, Club Monocle, RentItems

Mobile development (Flutter) Web development Product design (UX/UI) Branding
AppTailors homepage
Homepage of apptailors.co, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to AppTailors.

APPVERK

Poznań software house building compliant-by-design software for regulated sectors, together with sister privacy firm LexDigital.

Clutch: 5.0 (6 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD

Best for: Regulated-sector companies that need software built to pass a DORA, NIS2 or GDPR audit.

Verdict. Pick APPVERK for software that must pass a DORA or NIS2 audit, where its sister legal firm helps. For a large build, its public track record is thin.

Pros

  • GoWork employee opinions lean positive, with 9 positive against 3 negative.
  • APPVERK builds DORA, NIS2 and GDPR compliance into delivery, with a sister legal firm behind it.
  • The site declares ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.

Cons

  • APPVERK reported a profit of only 11K PLN on 8.8M PLN of revenue in 2025.
  • Clutch shows only 6 reviews.
  • The team of 60+ is counted for the whole group, including the legal firm.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • AppVerk Group joins the software house with LexDigital, a privacy and cybersecurity firm (source).
  • The homepage claims 60+ experts across the group and 100+ projects. It also lists ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001 (source).
  • The contact page names AppVerk Sp. z o.o. at Grodziska 8 in Poznań, with KRS 0000531041 (source).
  • Clutch lists 6 reviews with a perfect average (source).

Clients they name: LexDigital, NOVOL, NICE Polska, 4FUN.TV

Custom web and mobile software Compliance by design (DORA, NIS2, GDPR) Security and performance audits Secure SDLC Machine learning DevOps
APPVERK homepage
Homepage of appverk.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to APPVERK.

Merixstudio

Poznań software company building web, mobile and AI products and modernizing legacy systems, mostly for international clients.

Clutch: 4.8 (97 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 25,000 USD Premier Verified

Best for: Companies that want a certified team to build a web, mobile or AI product or rewrite a legacy system.

Verdict. Pick Merixstudio for a web or AI product or a legacy rewrite, backed by ISO certificates and 97 Clutch reviews. If you need only one or two engineers, it fits less well.

Pros

  • Merixstudio reported a profit of 2.9M PLN on 29.1M PLN of revenue in 2025.
  • Clutch shows 97 reviews averaging 4.8.
  • Merixstudio declares ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 and shows TÜV NORD logos.
  • Named case studies cover Six Flags, Juilliard School and Biocore.

Cons

  • The current company dates from 2021, while the brand claims 1999, so part of the history sits in earlier entities.
  • We found no GoWork data and no open JustJoin offers, so we could not check staff sentiment or hiring.
  • The Dubai presence is a partner rather than an own office.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The brand says it has built software since 1999. The legal entity, MERIXSTUDIO sp. z o.o., has KRS 0000938427 from 2021 (source).
  • The about page claims about 100 expert-level people, all mids and seniors (source).
  • ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 are shown with TÜV NORD Polska logos (source).
  • The Dubai presence runs through an on-site partner, Solution21, rather than an own office (source).

Clients they name: Six Flags, Juilliard School, Biocore, RP Group, HYDAC, Toshiba

Web and enterprise development Mobile development AI integration Software modernization Cloud and DevOps Product discovery and design AI
Merixstudio homepage
Homepage of www.merixstudio.com, screenshot taken October 28, 2026. Content and marks belong to Merixstudio.

Inigra

Poznań software house building fixed-price MVPs, mobile apps and AI features for founders in the UK, US and EU.

Clutch: 5.0 (13 reviews) Rate: 50–99 USD/h Min. project: 5,000 USD

Best for: Founders who want a fixed-price MVP or a rescue of a Lovable or no-code prototype, with prices known up front.

Verdict. Pick Inigra for a fixed-price MVP or to harden an AI-built prototype on a known budget. Skip it for a large, long-running platform that needs a big team.

Pros

  • Prices are on the site: fixed price from £5,000 for 4-8 weeks and retainers from £1,000 a month.
  • Clutch shows 5.0 from 13 reviews with a $5,000 minimum.
  • Lists 22 case studies and named clients in the UK, the US and Australia.
  • The legal entity is on the site: Inigra Sp. z o.o. in Poznań.

Cons

  • A small company: the 2025 filing shows about 0.5M PLN of revenue, so it cannot staff a large team.
  • Claims of 5-10x faster AI-assisted builds are marketing, so check quality in the weekly demos.
  • Small team, built for short fixed-scope projects rather than large platforms.
  • No open roles at the last snapshot.

From their website and Clutch profile

  • The home page publishes fixed prices from £5,000 / $6,500 / €5,800 for 4-8 weeks, a typical focused MVP at £5k-£30k+, and retainers from £1,000 a month (source).
  • The home page claims AI-assisted development cuts build time 5-10x and lists 22 case studies (source).
  • Quoted Clutch clients include GFIRS Intelligence Ventures and Create-AI Ltd in the UK, Flexmode in Miami and Virtual Manikin in Australia, with one project migrating a Lovable prototype (source).
  • The footer names Inigra Sp. z o.o. at Piekary 7 in Poznań, KRS 0000798049 (source).

Clients they name: GFIRS Intelligence Ventures, Create-AI Ltd, Flexmode, Virtual Manikin

MVP development Web and software development Native mobile apps AI services No-code and Lovable app rescue Cloud and DevOps Long-term development retainers AI

Every company we checked

The table below has the 14 companies with TypeScript evidence in Poznań, including the ones that do not qualify for the ranking, with the reason. Sort by any column.

Show all 14 companies
Size: Rate: · 14
#CompanyHQ (KRS)PeopleClutchRateRevenueProfitFocusScoreLinks
1
Flutter Development AA+ TypeScript 45% mobile app development
Poznań10-495.0 · 1925–49 USD/h2.1M PLN-130K PLNTypeScript 45% mobile app development71Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
2
AppTailors TypeScript 20% startups and MVPs
Poznań10-495.0 · 7n/a2.2M PLN639K PLNTypeScript 20% startups and MVPs60Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
3
APPVERK TypeScript 10% fintech
Poznań50-2495.0 · 650–99 USD/h8.8M PLN11K PLNTypeScript 10% fintech58Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
4
Merixstudio TypeScript 10% AI agents
Poznań50-2494.8 · 9750–99 USD/h29.1M PLN2.9M PLNTypeScript 10% AI agents57Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
5
Inigra TypeScript 10% startups and MVPs
Poznań10-495.0 · 1350–99 USD/h518K PLN40K PLNTypeScript 10% startups and MVPs52Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
Netguru too little client evidence
Poznań250-9994.8 · 7350–99 USD/h127.5M PLN6.3M PLNTypeScript: 1 role AI agents53Website Portfolio Clutch KRS
–
DevsPower too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 725–49 USD/hn/an/aTypeScript 40% startups and MVPs51Website Portfolio Clutch
–
Red Rocket Software too little client evidence
n/a10-494.9 · 2925–49 USD/hn/an/aTypeScript 30% startups and MVPs46Website Clutch
–
The BitByBit Company too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 750–99 USD/hn/an/aTypeScript 25% startups and MVPs41Website Portfolio Clutch
–
codecreed under 10 people
n/a2-95.0 · 125–49 USD/hn/an/aTypeScript 20% startups and MVPs34Website Clutch
–
G-Group.dev too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1225–49 USD/hn/an/aTypeScript 10% fintech31Website Clutch
–
Sea Custom Software Development too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.9 · 1150–99 USD/hn/an/aTypeScript 10% logistics30Website Clutch
–
NextApps too little client evidence
n/a10-495.0 · 350–99 USD/hn/an/aTypeScript 10% mobile app development29Website Clutch
–
Zealous System too little client evidence
n/a50-2494.6 · 24n/an/an/aTypeScript 10% AI agents28Website Clutch

All companies in the data set, with the same score. Companies without a confirmed office, sole traders, body-leasing firms and product companies are listed but not ranked.

Who is not in the top 5, and why

Too little client evidence, under 10 people, sole traders

Without 5 Clutch reviews or 2M PLN of revenue in a filing there is no fair way to compare a company with the rest. That is a data gap, not a verdict.

  • codecreed
  • NextApps

Weak evidence for TypeScript

They meet the data criteria, but the topic rests on a small Clutch share, a few job ads or a single source. They may do it; the data just does not show it.

  • Netguru
  • DevsPower
  • Red Rocket Software
  • The BitByBit Company
  • G-Group.dev
  • Sea Custom Software Development
  • Zealous System

What they charge

On Clutch, the companies in this table most often declare 50 to 99 USD an hour. The rate is what the agency bills; the developer on your project is paid less than half of it.

For comparison, my own rate is 36 to 54 USD an hour (45 USD base, pricing). The cost estimator shows what a project like yours costs with and without coding agents.

25-49 USD/h 5
50-99 USD/h 7
100-149 USD/h 0
150-199 USD/h 0
Rates declared on Clutch, 12 companies with an office in the city.

Check any agency yourself in 10 minutes

  1. TypeScript on the label means little until you see strict mode on and shared types between front end and API. Ask for a code sample or a public repository.
  2. Find the legal entity in the National Court Register: the seat, the share capital and the shareholders. An office here with a seat in another city is a sales office, not a team.
  3. Read the last financial statement in the Financial Documents Repository (free, by KRS number): revenue, profit or loss, and whether it was filed on time.
  4. Check the VAT white list: active, and the name matches the contract.
  5. On the Clutch list hover over the company link; a link through ppc.clutch.co is an ad. Then read the reviews themselves.
  6. On GoWork read the employee reviews, not the stars, and look for layoffs and rotation.
  7. Ask who exactly will work on your project, and check those people on LinkedIn.

Get offers from the best-fit agencies

Describe your project, get offers in 24 hours

Tell me what you are building. Within 24 hours on working days you get my own estimate and a shortlist of the best-fit agencies from this ranking with their offers, or my match if they stay silent. No commission, no obligation.

Budget
When

By clicking Send you agree that I store your request and reply by email; no newsletter. I reply within 24 hours on working days, personally. If I am late, the first hour of work is free.

How this works: I write back with my own offer and forward your brief to the agencies that fit, after you agree. As of October 30, 2026 no agency pays me for leads and this page has no affiliate links. If that changes, it will say so here.

Questions

What are the best TypeScript software houses in Poznań in 2027?

By the score on this page: 1. Flutter Development AA+ (71), 2. AppTailors (60), 3. APPVERK (58), 4. Merixstudio (57), 5. Inigra (52). The score adds up transparency in the court register, client reviews on Clutch, profit and stability in the latest filing, specialization and current hiring. The full table shows every company checked.

How much do TypeScript agencies in Poznań charge?

Most companies in this table declare 50 to 99 USD an hour on Clutch. My own rate as a senior engineer working with AI agents is 36 to 54 USD an hour.

How do you know a company does TypeScript?

From at least one of three sources: the service, industry and framework shares on the Clutch profile, the skills in open roles on JustJoin.it, or my own Wrocław catalog. Companies with two or three sources score higher on specialization. The software house finder shows the same tags for every company.

Did any company pay to be on this list?

No. There are no paid placements and no affiliate links. The only business interest is mine: I sell senior engineering as the alternative to an agency.

Can I get my company added or corrected?

Yes. Write to ciunkos@gmail.com with the KRS number and the correction.

How this ranking was made

  • 1,487 companies in the data set
  • 722 checked in the National Court Register
  • 453 with a financial statement
  • 7,436 Clutch listing positions read, paid ones marked
  • 690 employee review profiles on GoWork
  • 2+ months of data collection, since September 2026

The company list comes from a full read of the Clutch city listing (every page, with paid positions marked by their ppc.clutch.co links), the ITCORNER cluster, Google results and job ads. Every company was checked in the National Court Register (KRS) for its seat, legal form, capital and shareholders, in rejestr.io and the Financial Documents Repository for revenue and profit from the latest filing, on GoWork for employee sentiment, layoff mentions and review clusters, and on the JustJoin.it and No Fluff Jobs boards for open roles and the stack they actually pay for. The 0 to 100 score is five axes with published weights: transparency, client reputation, stability, specialization, activity. A paid Clutch placement does not raise the score.

Disclosures

  • Until November 2026 I work at Sanddev (Wrocław) as the founding engineer of its Sandtime product. Sanddev appears in the full table with the same score as everyone else and no editorial favor.
  • As a contractor I have talked with, or applied to, some of the agencies on these lists. None of them knew about this ranking and none of it changed a score.
  • No agency pays for a position, there are no affiliate links, and no company has seen its entry before publication. If any of that changes, the disclosure changes first.
  • My business interest is on every page: I sell senior engineering with AI agents as the alternative to hiring an agency.
  • Written with AI (Claude) from the data set. Every number in the editorial text is checked automatically against the company record or the research notes, and every top entry was read against the company’s own website. Sources and check dates are under each entry.

Spotted an error or want your company added? Write to ciunkos@gmail.com. Full methodology and weights →

Przemysław Zalewski

About the author

Przemysław Zalewski, a senior full-stack engineer in Wrocław with 15+ years of shipping software. I ran this catalog for two months while choosing my own next clients, so every number here was useful to me before it was useful to you. I build with coding agents, work with clients in the US and the UK, and I sell the alternative to the agencies on this list.

LinkedIn · X · GitHub · Hire me · Pricing

Przemysław Zalewski

How I work

Przemysław Zalewski · 15+ years shipping software

“a true bias for action” client CTO, public LinkedIn recommendation

My pledge

All principles, the AI policy and working hours →

Pricing · Security · Privacy and analytics opt-out · Trust center